BetSelection.cc

Please login or register.

Topic: 1-3-2-6 Yes, it is not new but most successful M.M. for me  (Read 6770 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline alrelax

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2582
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
1-3-2-6 Yes, it is not new but most successful M.M. for me
« on: August 05, 2015, 02:17:00 PM »
  • ReplyReply
  • No, it is not new.  No, I did not invent it.  Yes, I know it has been out there like dozens of others.  However, the 1-3-2-6 M.M. schedule has been good to me and I try (TRY) to use it, especially when I am winning or neutral.  It gives me plenty of ammunition and helps me curtail losses when I am winning and desire to pile it up.

    Best thing for me, is the risk of 1 or 2 unit only on a series of 4.  If I win the first two, my 2 risk units are returned to me with a 2 unit profit while I am supplied with the 3rd wager of 2 units without risk of my own money.  The fourth wager won if followed would be ammunition that allows me to play less stressful. 

    The 1-3-2-6 stops me (when I follow it) of curtailing losses after my immediate wins.

    Does anyone else use this??


    Offline alrelax

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 2582
    • Gender: Male
      • View Profile
    Re: 1-3-2-6 Yes, it is not new but most successful M.M. for me
    « Reply #1 on: August 05, 2015, 09:19:21 PM »
  • ReplyReply
  • I will explain it.  First, it is NOT a wagering selection system and second, I do use it successfully when I am winning on a pretty constant rhythm. 

    It helps me (me, as in I) stop from the continual throwing in of the win money with or without additional units from my B.R., if I follow it.

    In sequences of 4 if I was winning, I would follow it.  If not, I stick to risking my 1 and 2 units.  Here is the way I would use it.

    Let's say I was wagering $100.00 to start.  1 unit @ $100.00.  I would wager from my B.R. the $100.00.  If I won I would parlay the winning and risk an additional $100.00.  Second wager is $300.00.  If I won, I put $400.00 back into my B.R., $200 original returned and $200 win money.  My third wager is $200.00 from the second wager win also.  Now I play on the casino. If lose the 3rd wager, back to 1 unit/$100.  I have 2 tries to take off again on the casino, because I still have the $200.00 in my bankroll from them.  If I win the 3rd wager, I go to the 4th, which would be $600 in this case. On the 4th wager I have to grab that $200.00/2 units I put into my B.R. from the 2 win wager to make the 6 units on the fourth.  If win the 4th, I am now sitting with $1,200.00 win money.  If I lose the 4th like I said, I still have the $200.00 I originally risked  to try one unit, twice to build back up.

    Hopefully I explained that right.

    Offline alrelax

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 2582
    • Gender: Male
      • View Profile
    Re: 1-3-2-6 Yes, it is not new but most successful M.M. for me
    « Reply #2 on: August 09, 2015, 05:17:58 PM »
  • ReplyReply
  • Lose is lose.  The lose is lost, period.  I do not use this if I am losing for a recovery, seldom, maybe a touch of it??  But, for me where it has proven itself and helped me a lot is when I am winning.  For me, when I win more than 2 or 3 in a row or say 4 out of 6 anyways, I have a hard time to set aside sin chips.  This allows me to conserve some of the chips if things go south quickly and cuts down tremendously on digging into the B.R. 

    When I am on the right side of the Bell Curve/Variance it really does allow me better wagering.

    Offline super6

    • Rising Member
    • **
    • Posts: 43
      • View Profile
    Re: 1-3-2-6 Yes, it is not new but most successful M.M. for me
    « Reply #3 on: August 09, 2015, 11:45:13 PM »
  • ReplyReply
  • I tried this method below. Win some days lose some days. What do you think?

    We always bet Banker.
    We use 1-3-2-6 sequentially whether we win or lose (132613261326...). Examples

    PBPB = +6
    PBPBBB = +10
    BBB = +6 (and not +3)
    PPPBPPBB = +4

    That means, we don't care if we win or lose that hand, we will still continue the 1-3-2-6 sequence. As for ties, it will be counted, and next bet will be the next sequence after a tie
    PBTBB = +9

    I've been OK with this system. It beats almost every bad streak, and we start with a bankroll of 36. Our daily goal is +20.

    Any comments


    Offline Tomla

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 467
      • View Profile
    Re: 1-3-2-6 Yes, it is not new but most successful M.M. for me
    « Reply #4 on: August 10, 2015, 01:32:42 AM »
  • ReplyReply
  • kind of funky super 6---i tested 3 shoes and did well on all 3 and one of the shoes i was getting crushed early

    Offline alrelax

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 2582
    • Gender: Male
      • View Profile
    Re: 1-3-2-6 Yes, it is not new but most successful M.M. for me
    « Reply #5 on: August 10, 2015, 01:05:32 PM »
  • ReplyReply
  • I have to stress, it is still YOU, it is not a bet selection advantage process at all.  Super 6 cites he wagers only Banker and with a player streaking shoe or a heavier player shoe, one will get crushed with this!  However, it is the best I found over the years to push out win money and maintain a B.R. all depending on will power of course and what one starts that first unit wager with. 

    Consistently if one is losing he can reset after the 1-3 loss without risking another 8 units on the 2-6 wagers.  Sit down with a pen and paper and make a Risk/Wager/Win-Loss/Bankroll columns and work it out.

    Offline RichBailey86

    • Rising Member
    • **
    • Posts: 44
    • Gender: Male
      • View Profile
    Re: 1-3-2-6 Yes, it is not new but most successful M.M. for me
    « Reply #6 on: August 22, 2015, 02:39:34 AM »
  • ReplyReply
  • 1 3 2 6 as in reset on any loss

    1. If win bet 3  if win bet 2  if win bet 6.

    At any time.you lose back to 1?
    Danny: Because the house always wins. Play long enough, you never change the stakes. The house takes you. Unless, when that perfect hand comes along, you bet and you bet big, then you take the house.

    Rusty: You've been practicing this speech, haven't you?

    Danny: Little bit. Did I rush it? Felt I rushed it.

    Offline gr8player

    • Baccarat
    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 257
    • Gender: Male
    • Player's Edges
      • View Profile
    Re: 1-3-2-6 Yes, it is not new but most successful M.M. for me
    « Reply #7 on: August 22, 2015, 12:55:13 PM »
  • ReplyReply
  • 1-3-2-4, up-as-you-win (replace that 6-bet with a 4-bet)

    Offline AsymBacGuy

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 556
      • View Profile
    Re: 1-3-2-6 Yes, it is not new but most successful M.M. for me
    « Reply #8 on: August 27, 2015, 01:59:43 AM »
  • ReplyReply
  • Sharp cats are ALWAYS betting their first bet higher than the second bet after a win 2-1  then continue with the powerful regression system.


    ND

    I quote.

    as.
    Winners are simply willing to do what losers won't

    Offline alrelax

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 2582
    • Gender: Male
      • View Profile
    Re: 1-3-2-6 Yes, it is not new but most successful M.M. for me
    « Reply #9 on: August 27, 2015, 01:01:51 PM »
  • ReplyReply
  • I have witnessed tons of 'sharp cats' after years lose their behind, their houses, their businesses, their families for wagering the way they do.  Nothing against you and all your 'sharp cats' thou.

    One unit is best and as I said IMO and for me anyways.  The sharper they are, the more successful they are, the more they win, (and all IMO) the harder they and larger they fall.

    The trick is e as possible and if lose, back to square one. 

    Offline ezmark

    • Steady Member
    • **
    • Posts: 86
      • View Profile
    Re: 1-3-2-6 Yes, it is not new but most successful M.M. for me
    « Reply #10 on: August 27, 2015, 11:17:15 PM »
  • ReplyReply
  • Someone can break this down for me pros and cons compared to 1 3 2 6 .

    Why not use a positive progression with one unit at risk as  1 2 4 8 

    a run of 5 will net 14 units.

    assuming all progressions have 4 bets in total each time.

    you may select one side as B or P  and  the progression begins with the second position

    Offline alrelax

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 2582
    • Gender: Male
      • View Profile
    Re: 1-3-2-6 Yes, it is not new but most successful M.M. for me
    « Reply #11 on: August 29, 2015, 02:47:23 PM »
  • ReplyReply
  • Good Luck on the four in a row.  Keep up the great work!

    Offline ezmark

    • Steady Member
    • **
    • Posts: 86
      • View Profile
    Re: 1-3-2-6 Yes, it is not new but most successful M.M. for me
    « Reply #12 on: August 29, 2015, 03:36:14 PM »
  • ReplyReply
  • Thanks alrelax, I find it difficult to win 4 in a row.

    Offline alrelax

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 2582
    • Gender: Male
      • View Profile
    Re: 1-3-2-6 Yes, it is not new but most successful M.M. for me
    « Reply #13 on: August 29, 2015, 09:53:32 PM »
  • ReplyReply
  • Easier to win 1 or 2 then 3 and 4 in a row.  1-2-4-8 is great, keep track and see how many time you can actually accomplish that.  1-3-2-6 allows you to have extra attempts (on your win chips) if you don't get past the 3rd attempt,  to accomplish the series of four. 

    Offline stratocasterman

    • Member
    • **
    • Posts: 3
    • Gender: Male
      • View Profile
    Re: 1-3-2-6 Yes, it is not new but most successful M.M. for me
    « Reply #14 on: August 30, 2015, 12:14:20 AM »
  • ReplyReply
  • I agree with the 1-3-2-4...instead of the 6u last bet