Last night.  Played the majority of the hands shown in this one shoe, about 3/4 of a full shoe as you see here.  Followed what was happening most times and lost the last wager of course and then started on the next presentation.

Caught 9 players hands in that players streak with a few full parlays.  Same with the bankers streak as well.

THE 4 HANDS PRIOR TO THE 3 IAR NATURALS IN THE PLAYERS STREAK:  A bit unique.

P First two = 0.  B First two = 7. Players third card was an 8.  Players 8 over 7.

P First two = 5.  B First two = 6.  Players third card was a 6.  Bankers third card was a 4.  Players 1 over 0.

P First two = 3.  B First two = 2.  Players third card was a 9.  B third card was also a 9.  Players 2 over 1.

P First two = 6.  B First two = 5.  Bankers third card was a 10.  Players 6 over 5.

All four hands players won by 1 point.  Now on to the 3 back to back naturals.


THE 3 IAR NATURALS IN THE PLAYERS STREAK:

First one in group of three:  Players Natural 9 over B Natural 8.

Second one in group of three:  Players Natural 9 over B Natural 8 again.

Third one in group of three:  Players Natural 8 over B 7. 

Once again all 3 Natural players hands won by 1 point.

That made 7 IAR players hands winning by 1 point.  2 cards, 3 card reductions, naturals, etc. 

And of course that fueled the majority of the people playing to wager heavy banker, because they were convinced that was the pattern/trend showing the players would quickly fall off and cut. 

Does the casino care that a few of us were physically banging them and cleaning up?  Of course not!  Why?  Because, they still make money by taking in all those heavy losing bankers bets and paying out the few of us that were winning all the players bets.  Gotta love it!

I contribute three things to my success with this shoe.  One, Low Ties-0-1-2-3.  Two, Equalization.  Three, defining sections and wagering heavy after the start of each.

3 sections is the way I played the shoe, up to the 60th hand or so when I stopped in section C anyways.

Good shoe/congrats on catching so many Ws.

"...Caught 9 players hands in that players streak with a few full parlays.  Same with the bankers streak as well...."

    Personally I do not think I would have done as well as u, Re:The 9iar P streak.
I "think" I would have caught the P2nd--5th with a full press or parlay+ from P2 to P3(maybe into the P4th), then pospro continued but less %press through the 5th W, (set aside that highest wager following the 5thP(my 4th W) for later reentry into this shoe or latter shoe).

Then reduced to about 3 increments above my (Mean Losing Bet) thus far in the whole shoe and finished out the P run from W5 onward regressing $5 on each successive W through the 9th W, never wagering less than my base unit.
    I doubt I would have made any bonus bets.


Continued Success,