QuoteCalm...calm...calm down, Al.

Exactly why he should be ignored: arrogant, rude and thinks he's above everyone else.

Ignore him people, he never acknowledges or thanks any contribution.

QuoteCalm...calm...calm down, Al.

You can see what is provoking me to answer like this.

QuoteIgnore him people, he never acknowledges or thanks any contribution.

What you have contributed, so far? New Fallacies and innovative and copy+paste ideas to how to lose more and win less. If someone has really helped me, they are programmers like Victor, Steph, Ophis etc. I have never forgot thanking them.

Where can I get access to those numbers?

See the beginning of this debate.

Quote from: Superman on May 07, 2013, 06:32:33 AM
For the life of me I cannot understand why any of you are entertaining Alababa, he has the grail already and just wants someone else to do his work for him. Everyone who replies here gets the same thrown at them from him, why bother?

----Even thought rarely agree with you,/RNG/but this time...RIGHT ON THE NAIL.

Don't be so hard with the guy....

He just wants to see something deeper.....

He just hope a hero comes and show him, that is possible to perform great over the entire sample.

You really want me to play the entire sample?

My Great Master tell me once , if you can't win , lose as little as possible..

You said my method will lose couple of hundred thousands of chips , you really believe that?

I don't.


As a dispersion Killer i never, ever, run from a match....

And this data sample is a great sparring.

So i will accept the challenge, if i can't win i will lose as little as i can....

GGasoft

This challenge is meant for a real maestro. Kindergarten methods will fall flat here. Most of the people are looking for winning in those sessions, which can be won even with flat bet. A few talk of methods without knowing the real implications of that. So far, 100% failure over this challenge and whoever claimed to beat, could not prove anything serious.
           Ggasoft, Adulay and Flat_ino, if you feel you can play and beat this, prove your methods upon the entire data. If the method is really workable, that will win another number having similar traits too. If someone reverse engineers this data to get a fake win, he will be exposed very easily.
          A method that wins good performing number and that can handle the worst too, is truly difficult. I have yet to see any in any of the forums.

Quote from: Albalaha on May 08, 2013, 05:24:58 PMnot prove anything serious.
           Ggasoft, Adulay and Flat_ino, if you feel you can play and beat this, prove your methods upon the entire data. If the method is really workable, that will win another number having similar traits too. If someone reverse engineers this data to get a fake win, he will be exposed very easily.
          A method that wins good performing number and that can handle the worst too, is truly difficult. I have yet to see any in any of the forums.

Al,

  (sigh...)

  I've asked you several times for whatever the next worst number is to VALIDATE my previous solution to your silly challenge.

  As you've already "defeated" roulette (by your own words) I'll just assume you're tossing this innane challenge out just for grins and giggles.

  So, I've showed a profit on your challenge.   I'm still waiting for whatever the next losing number is to see if MY solution is valid.  Get your act together and post up the next number that desperately needs to be beaten down in the Great Albalaha's Roulette Challenge (and goat rope) of 2013.

  I'd hate to put out something that you didn't approve of.

  Oh yeah, the local indian (Native American) casino just paid for ANOTHER new Glock 21 for me.   But alas, it was baccarat and not roulette that did all the "work".

  AD   

Albalaha to fight your challenge i need to unlock and evolution to the system i originally used.

I was thinking i didn't need to do more effort but since you are asking for being functional for the entire data sample, i need to evolve the system a few generations from what your first saw on the video.

Primitive dispersion surfing will not be able to handle the challenge.

I need to unlock the same system but a few generations later. Am i allowed to do that?

GGasoft

--I would just suggest Alba that you check all last year Wiesbaden sessions around 300 spins/and
aprox.there are about 3 each night/--and on the bottom of each sessions there are records of each number hit--and when you find a session without any of 37 numbers unhit ....please let us know.
3x300x30x12=about 324.000 spins....all this;we know that number don't hit even 600 spins....it is
all one great b....t......are you ppl.playing roulette at all......it is played session by session....not some
silly zuma,RNG,and all that kind of stuff,trillion spins........that is not roulette and thatway you will never
be a winner.324000 spins/sessoin per session/are my winning test of your challenge.Again I'm talking
about live game of roulette.

Albalaha

I call dispersion killing unlocks level 7 8 9

I call my swarm classic system from the forum where i come from and i will convert it to play on your challenge.

Final result at spin 15000

+5062

I did put time on your challenge and i play spin after spin , with the system.

Thank you was a lot of fun!

Without stuff like your post , forum will represent almost no fun for a Dispersion Killer like me.

I did work as you ask , so now it is your duty have a serius analisys on the data im sending you on the attachment.

Cheers

GGasoft your new "Maestro"

GGasoft,
         let me look at the results. Oh again, you are using $100 chips in good times and $1 chips later. For how many times do I need to tell you that what you are doing is reverse engineering and instead of being called a "maestro", you may be termed as a "joker".
Flat_Ino,
           In a small sample of wiesbaden, a single number may not come even once and there is no point of trying that number because whoever plays on that number will lose. Number 3 challenge is not a test of your method but it is an endurance test of a very good system. I play much more roulette than you do and I have read and written far more about it than you can do till your life. Although, I don't have easy access to land based casinos but I do 3-4 trips of about a fortnight each time (a few short trips too) every year and have accounts with not less than 200 online casinos. I play, study and do my indigenous researches with the help of more than 2 dozen bots/tracker developed exclusively for me by the best known programmers of this forum world. I give not less than 3-4 hours on testing and developing new ideas.


Captain,
        You said you did it but yet to put proof of your victory before anyone. Let us all have your methodology and test report which you claim to have won +79. You will get the second worst number too, to work upon the same principals, if there are any. I have beaten the game and I can beat it in both short and long runs. Even you can do that if you have a strategy that can survive the worst.

THe .rmd is the file of the sesion i play on the roulette xtreme

You can open the file with that program and then check it.

GGasoft

GGasoft,
           Keep betting $100, $50 chips throughout 15k spins, as you did in beginning and then see the results of your superb strategy. Check your graph yourself and see what are you doing after first 700 spins where even the most unwise member can win. This is not a method but a joke.

All right im the joker leave it like that.

My great master toll me once:

Even if the way to win was on the wall of the casinos no one will ever pay attention to it.

GGasoft