GGasoft,
           Do not forget that it is not humor section. You have only done a joke by your so-called method here which is open to everyone to see and evaluate. Your so-called methods and test reports will be intact but no more jokes here, please.

Dear Student Albalaha

describe my joke in detail...

Describe on detail the system I use over the 15 000 spins.

Lets see how funny it is....

GGasoft

You are a magician who knows since beginning that the first 700 spins where the bet of ours is winning even flat bet has to be bet by $100 chips. Over-smartness sometimes make you look foolish. You are a loser. Anybody can see the graph of  your session and graph created by Victor by flat bet and bets made by you at "hot spots" and thereafter.
           Play the same regression all over 15k spins, you will start oozing blood. As I said earlier, stop fooling yourself.

Can someone else please explain GGasoft that what he is doing is a kind of reverse engineering and he has done nothing to beat the challenge? I think either he can't read what I am writing about his method or turned shameless.

You really need to test your system against multiple "bad" sequences. It's inevitable that there will be an element of curve-fitting if you've designed your system around one sequence. Ideally, you shouldn't be looking at the outcomes at all. 

I think he needs to see this graph:
http://betselection.cc/general-discussion/albalaha's-open-challenge-can-anyone-beat-the-worst/msg1340/#msg1340




GGasoft, 
         Go to kids and tell your variance killer stories. Here you are only making fun of yourself. You are, in no way, know how to handle variance/dispersion. You are winning where flat bet is winning and losing where flat bet is losing. What is your merit? You need to study kindergarten books on statistics/probability and mathematics of gambling.
               Do not make my topic a circus with clowns jumping around. I will delete all further posts of urs here having no substance. If you want to prove  your win, write a separate topic. In my observation and as per Bayes opinion too, u have only lost it very badly.

QuoteGive me the next worst number and I'll run it again.

Captain,
           It will be useless doing so. Since you have yet to come up with what exactly u did with number 3 challenge. Put that first in open here, if u have really beaten it or admit that you claimed falsely.

Why I should read stadistics books?

Stadistics are the worse way you can mention to win.

GGasoft.

Quote from: GGasoft on May 10, 2013, 08:35:21 AM


Stadistics are the worse way you can mention to win.

I beg to differ. 


Why do you think statistics is the worst way to win?

If you do not understand statistics/mathematics/probability you are just like a blind man claiming to shoot a flying bird. Those who are aware of that are having eyes at least.

Because no matter who much you study the numbers , events , pattern , make graphics , calculate where a deviation can go or how long can last.

No matter what you play:

You will experiment moments where you hit more than what suppose to hit , and moments where you will hit less that what you suppose to hit.

This moments can last thousands of spins or end the next spin, no control over them at all.

Stadistics will not help.

Lo que paso , paso , y no incide nada en lo que pasara.

GGasoft.

Quote from: Albalaha on May 10, 2013, 08:52:22 AM
If you do not understand statistics/mathematics/probability you are just like a blind man claiming to shoot a flying bird. Those who are aware of that are having eyes at least.

Probability ?

I should get 1 hit every 38 spins on a double 00 roulette.

Where is that on zuma sample?

GGasoft

You need to study mathematics fully. Don't you know about dispersion, standard deviation etc?

No albalaha    I don't know nothing.

Oh wait I use to know years ago.......

But since was all useless , I focus my efforts on betting more when I was winning , and less when I was losing.

GGasoft

Quote from: GGasoft on May 10, 2013, 08:55:50 AM
Because no matter who much you study the numbers , events , pattern , make graphics , calculate where a deviation can go or how long can last.

No matter what you play:

You will experiment moments where you hit more than what suppose to hit , and moments where you will hit less that what you suppose to hit.

This moments can last thousands of spins or end the next spin, no control over them at all.

Stadistics will not help.

Lo que paso , paso , y no incide nada en lo que pasara.

GGasoft.

Well, all I can say is: you ain't doing it right. 


I don't know how you can say that NOT knowing about how random outcomes behave is better than knowing - which is all that probability and statistics is about. 


What else do you have, apart from some kind of mystical intuition?


And even those who claim that they use gut-instinct and intuition have to put the work in beforehand - intuition doesn't come from no-where, it has to be earned. You can either spend years practising or study statistics and probability instead, and it will give you a lot more ideas about how to tackle randomness.