But since all my previous view, being
laughed as naive and fallacy,
I will just argue,
as *academic theory* only.
for the record, worst ever recorded EC,
is still 69hit/200,
that beatable with labby,
as labby only need
33%+1win to win 1unit.
now (with due respect)
Albalaha, try to push the limit ,
unbeatable with conventional labby, but
beatable with modified labby.
Albalaha also found that,
(but only few hundreds thousands zumma's hands)
that the worst WAS 30hit/100.
but he argued that the
worst may less than 30/100,
lurking somewhere in the
zumma's, not yet found by anyone.
but 30hit/100 can
easily beaten with modified labby, albeit, hundreds of chips, which impossible in bm.
Now, if Albalaha could search the millions of zumma's, and (very sure, 100% confirm)
if there never less than 15player/50hands,..30%...
then could easily won with modified labby,( though less then needed 33%). and need less chips compare to 100 or 200 hands...that run into thousands of chips!
few people already know how to beat with modified labby, but,
of course keep their mouths tightly shut, else casino change rules!