Are you fan of inside betting in roulette? How many numbers do you like to bet? If you pick one number only, it could take 1 spin to 500 spins(or even more) to get just one hit. No progression will help.

How about two? Hmm. any random pick of two numbers may take you upto 200 spins for its maiden hit in worst days. Same goes for any set of numbers, irrespective of how you choose them.

Can we make it safer, slightly?

Thanks for asking these important questions. We should never bet too many or too few numbers. And we should know the best time to stop.  I know: Almost impossible.
My latest idea, however, is to stop right after two hits in row. Before I reach this goal I intend to bet  some squares (corners) and some streets in area 1 to 36. I have not tested it yet, but here is the bet selection:

Squares: I only bet any square performing  with ONLY THE LOWEST OF ITS FOUR NUMBERS (of course I could as well have chosen the highest ones). Streets: I only bet "full streets" (with all three numbers performing).

Inside betting is best way to bet, any where from 1 to 18 numbers. I can only speak from my own experiences. The word "harsh" only exist in one's mind when one is losing. The only thing I find harsh about playing roulette is; it is boring.

If anything, if a player finds roulette exciting and fun, that player has a gambling problem. Now that my friends is a harsh reality.

The Crow

Quote from: The Crow on July 19, 2019, 11:00:10 PM
Inside betting is best way to bet, any where from 1 to 18 numbers. I can only speak from my own experiences. The word "harsh" only exist in one's mind when one is losing. The only thing I find harsh about playing roulette is; it is boring.

If anything, if a player finds roulette exciting and fun, that player has a gambling problem. Now that my friends is a harsh reality.

The Crow

I agree absolutely. Roulette is extremely boring for a sensible player.

Even dozen/colum and EC bets drag to 100s of spins to get under control. Playing 1-2 inside numbers could take forever to win with any sensible approach. We have seen how #3 of zumma kept doing superbad for entire 15,000 spins.