Although, Positive gambling module takes care of 90% of the harshest sessions possible to take them out of placed bets but even after all the safeguards, one can still witness tough and bad stretches in EC betting. Let us see how the different harsh sessions were dealt by Positive Gambling Module, I call it PGM.
Note: All Ls and Ws were played ones.

Session 1:

L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W

            It was one of the worst sessions possible. 151 Losses and 89 Wins only. No streak to help much.
Max bet=43 units.
Max DD= -203
End=+25

Session:2

   Maxbet   23   Finish   11
                   Count L   60   
Worst   -85      COUNT W   45   





L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W

3rd Session:
   Maxbet   25   Finish   9   
                              Count L   64      
Worst   -105                 COUNT W   52      





L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W

4th Session:
   Maxbet   29   Finish   19
                Count L   69   
Worst   -88     COUNT W 56   






L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W

5th Session:
   Maxbet   13   Finish   6
                Count L   57   
Worst   -59   COUNT W   43   






L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W

Session 6:
   Maxbet   15   Finish   1
              Count L   57   
Worst   -89   COUNT W   43   





L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W

Session7:

   Maxbet   23   Finish   8   
               Count L   82      
Worst   -77   COUNT W   63      





L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W

Albalaha,

Most progressions which I've experimented with that do well over longer stretches don't do so well in the short sequences. This is because you are always anticipating the run from hell so don't raise your stakes too quickly.

Although the run from hell has to be provided for, most sessions will be average, so does your money management make reasonable profits for the overwhelming majority of average sessions?

I can provide you with some bad runs and would be interested to see how your progression does with them.

Quote from: Jake on June 21, 2016, 12:31:11 PM
Albalaha,

Most progressions which I've experimented with that do well over longer stretches don't do so well in the short sequences. This is because you are always anticipating the run from hell so don't raise your stakes too quickly.

Although the run from hell has to be provided for, most sessions will be average, so does your money management make reasonable profits for the overwhelming majority of average sessions?

I can provide you with some bad runs and would be interested to see how your progression does with them.

Jake,
My progression does great in good and average times too and it is not tailor made only for bad stretches. It is a dynamic approach of play that is tough even to imagine for 99.99999% of players.
           You can post tough sessions but the toughest patch will also smooth down later, so u need to send me atleast 500 spins starting from the start of the bad stretch. I do not claim to win each and every permutation and combination or every possible scenario but can hold in the most or lose 300 units max.
            An MM meant only for a particular style of variance is sure to lose in others as Martingale, Laboucher, HP Johnson, D'alembert etc does. Those who are unable to simulate long enough, get trapped in those easily.
          Jake, you also need to specify if you and Betjack are one and same and who among you wrote me recently on my email?

Hi, I made 1 quick test with just one milder type hybrid progression, substituted with flat betting (so continous betting), and withOUT any BB increment, LSH, and x% recovery rule...it could solve all of these harsh sequences by itself without too deep DDs, but with too high bets sometimes (risky) - due to the lacking safeguard options. So, there are better iow SAFER soutions.
Max. bets:
1st seq.:  50 units
2nd:  16 un.
3rd:  40 un.
4th:  15 un.
5th:  21 un.
6th:  79 un. (dd: -179 un.)
7th:  93 un. (dd: -154 un.)
Regards

Dear Janos @ Audiokinesis,
         Indeed the last two sessions are not so harsh with compare to earlier 5 but it all depends on the MM you chose to play with. Bet of 93 or 79 units should not have been needed but Drawdown is not that big with compare to the variance we are getting.

You are closer to perfection, yet need to work more to make it better.

Harsh Session #8:

   Maxbet   9              Finish   1   
               Count L   61      
WORST   -31   COUNT W   46      






L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W

Quote from: Albalaha on June 21, 2016, 03:55:21 PM
You can post tough sessions but the toughest patch will also smooth down later, so u need to send me atleast 500 spins starting from the start of the bad stretch. I do not claim to win each and every permutation and combination or every possible scenario but can hold in the most or lose 300 units max.

Ok, but that doesn't sound very practical or realistic for actual play if you need 500 spins in order for things to even out.

Quote
Jake, you also need to specify if you and Betjack are one and same and who among you wrote me recently on my email?

No I'm not Betjack and haven't sent you an email.

QuoteOk, but that doesn't sound very practical or realistic for actual play if you need 500 spins in order for things to even out.

To win in the cases where u get only 7 wins in 50 spins or 20 wins in 100, what u need most is patience. If you think gambling is all about having fistful of chips and earning for sure in an hour, you are talking of negative gambling that is a sucker. Positive gambling corrects all fallacious thinking and provide the most accurate approach to play that has a positive expectation to win in/after the worst too apart from regular sessions. If you do not have enough patience or chips you should have too much of good luck to win. Sadly, even people with the best luck do not stand a winner in long run by their luck alone.

9th Harsh session:
   Maxbet   43   Finish   14
               Count L   113   
WORST   -180    COUNT W 89   






L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L