Harsh Session # 21:

    60 Wins  vs 80 losses:

L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W

Harsh Session #22:
      Losses=57, Wins=49 (bad start and later average)

L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W

Harsh Session #23:

147 losses vs 117 wins (very painful and tricky session)


L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W

Harsh Session #24:
                Wins 42 vs Losses 51


L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W

Harsh Session #25:
               60 Wins vs 71 Losses

L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W

Harsh Session #28:
                                        87 Wins vs 105 Losses: Very tricky session


L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W

Al,

  Are these "harsh sessions" you display here runs that you've played, seen, heard about or just imagined?

  Where do these come from?

  Thanks.

  AD

I play and simulate in excel. I try to pick the worst( in different types of challenges) sessions as Harsh and the point where I get at net profit session ends. A few sessions are imaginary too and a few provided by a friend. Few are so harsh that they can not appear realistically or in other words you need lots of extreme badluck to witness them.
          The motive behind compiling such diverse set of challenge is to see if my approach is really dynamic enough or not to handle all.

Quote from: Albalaha on January 06, 2017, 02:53:13 PM


Few are so harsh that they can not appear realistically or in other words you need lots of extreme badluck to witness them.

For whatever it is worth....badluck (which is not a viable explanation to what happens to players at a casino, but let's just call it that for sake of not arguing) happens all the darn time!  All the time.  So to witness them should be no problem.  But hey, maybe it is the old school people that have played for so many years have no idea......huh? 

          An average regular player playing 3-4 hours twice a week religiously for over 30 years can see 3,75,000 spins approx. I test over this many spins in a day. I have been doing this for last 8 years, at least 300 days a year. Now you can count my experience versus an "old school player's". If you think this is an aggregation, I tested over 10 million spins with ophis within 3 days. I have dozens of bots and trackers made by Victor(VLS), madmax(michael),Ophis, Stef, Nickmsi and many others exclusively meant for me.
                        Experience alone doesn't matter unless one is educated enough to analyse the cause and effect. A patient suffering from an incurable disease may only feel the pain and troubles associated, he can not cure himself with his experience. Doing Harsh sessions is all about "not seeing pink only" and being aware of what can happen with you. Those claim to beat the game with merely their wise selections are either crook or ignorant. Every bloody player will face worst of times despite being the smartest behind around.

Quote from: Albalaha on January 06, 2017, 02:53:13 PM
I play and simulate in excel. I try to pick the worst( in different types of challenges) sessions as Harsh and the point where I get at net profit session ends. A few sessions are imaginary too and a few provided by a friend. Few are so harsh that they can not appear realistically or in other words you need lots of extreme badluck to witness them.
          The motive behind compiling such diverse set of challenge is to see if my approach is really dynamic enough or not to handle all.

Albalaha,

  If I were to change those "W" and "L" to "Bank" and "Player" would the overall effect be the same?

  Thanks.

  AD

I tired to figure out albalaha's reasoning but to tell you the truth I also tried to figure out Claudio Osorio and what Jeb Brush and Obama was involved with being part of Innovido.  To me, both are very confusing.

But what do I know?  I am silly and like to being the kids to the live arcades with those redemption counters where the parents spend about $80.00 to get about $4.85 worth of toys that last about 2 days at best. 

Quote from: ADulay on January 07, 2017, 06:12:19 PM
Albalaha,

  If I were to change those "W" and "L" to "Bank" and "Player" would the overall effect be the same?

  Thanks.

  AD

You can consider W to any EC and L to its counterpart like Bank and Player.

Quote from: Albalaha on January 05, 2017, 11:08:11 PM
Harsh Session #28:
                                        87 Wins vs 105 Losses: Very tricky session

Albalaha,

  After reading your response that these "Harsh Sessions" would be the equivalent of any EC game, I elected to run your latest one (#28) using my current normal play method.

  As my baccarat sheets only go to 80 hands, I played the first 160 hands across two sheets.

  Flat betting Harsh Session #28, with a small progression AFTER wins of 4 in a row and 9 in a row, like normal, the result was a very nice +22 to finish.  (Without the small winning progression the result would have been +15 for strictly flat betting one unit per wager).

  Between hands 32 and 55 the bankroll did drop from a +17 to +10 but it recovered nicely shortly thereafter during the 8 IAR that showed up.

  The opening "10 IAR" set the tone nicely as the bankroll never went below that initial starting win.

  Long winning streak was 10 (hands 107 to 118) and long losing streak was 4 hands (3 times).

  I'll try to translate some of your earlier posts to see if this event holds up.

  AD

I do not know what you did but any method can work on any particular bad looking case. If anything works to get a net profit is same ideas played all sessions, that is worth serious thought.