I am onto something that has never been done so far. To the best of my knowledge only Martingale, Labouchere and Fibonacci can beat any session sooner or later. Unfortunately, to do so, they might need millions of chips starting from 1 unit and yet not capable to win huge. I have devised a purely mathematical way to beat the game which might seek only a few thousands chips, in the worst of the worst possible sessions.
             So far, I have tested all the real data I had of roulette and baccarat for EC betting and could beat them all finally. Can any of you help me getting the worst 1000 spins/hands EC real data? I would be obliged if I get the source from where the data was taken. I want to fully utilize my free timing during the pandemic to do the not doable thing and I believe I m close.

It is my most inner desire to beat the game mathematically in a manner which does not seek millions chips and which could handle the hugest variance. It would be a very aggressive approach unlike my last project, "millionaire's plan" which was a cold headed slow earner. Millionaire's plan has too many rules to take care of too which this method won't have. I have started my initial tests and it looks promising but whether it would end the uncertainty is a matter yet to be evaluated. I m pretty excited with my preliminary tests. Wish me luck.

Hi Alb

"...I have started my initial tests and it looks promising but whether it would end the uncertainty is a matter yet to be evaluated. I m pretty excited with my preliminary tests. Wish me luck.   ... "

Are you looking at doing this in Roulette or any EC game/wager? Any additional updates on your progress?
Best of luck to u. kfb

It is for all EC wagers. Let me see how far it goes..

I am coding it on excel to feel it better. Might need to tweak it a bit. Let us see. I will keep updating of its progress.

It passed through the worst thousand of zumma baccarat i.e. 442/1000 and finally won a nice net profit. I think it is working as intended. Does anybody have a worse data?

It has been almost done. A method that can handle the worst gracefully and win a net profit in average session thereafter. I just tested a session with horrible beginning and average hits thereafter. 98 wins vs 126 losses. Max bet=9 units, Net profit=32 units. Worst drawdown=-63 units.
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W

I found that if we apply both logic and experience and play with a cool head only to get desired result in a long run which could take even 2000 outcomes to conclude, we can keep on winning without any fear. We need a table with very nice spread say 1-100 chips at least, it is doable. Chance to burst and surrender an extreme session could be not ruled out completely but winning is sure in the long run.