Quote This is interesting. I would hypothesize u should see this often enough at front end of shoes to make your wait time tolerable.
     Q: Am I correct you allow these triggers to present across two shoes??

Shoes doesn't matter buddy. It is only a sequence of wins and losses for me. Say it is coin flipping and if they change coin, should it change any probability? I do not understand why guys like you who has considerable knowledge of math and experience ask such questions.

Quote What is bet spread for most of your online casinos? Can u actually see the cut and dealers dispersing cards for each individual hand??

Online, it is 10 to 50k on most tables and 25 to 5k-10k on others. I hate restrained bet limits. Although my current methodology seldom requires bet of more than 15 units.

QuoteNext News Story: "ALBALAHA COMING TO AMERICA"

   Maybe some day. I do not want to feature in the black book of casinos. Thanks for the best wishes

Hi Albalaha--I see youre still in the laboratory.

re: your thoughts. "...Shoes doesn't matter buddy. It is only a sequence of wins and losses for me. Say it is coin flipping and if they change coin, should it change any probability? I do not understand why guys like you who has considerable knowledge of math and experience ask such questions..."[/b]
     Because when Im not at live tables (approx 1800 hands per week), Im studying, and constantly striving to learn and improve my game from other players (especially the online players).

"...online, it is 10 to 50k on most tables and 25 to 5k-10k on others. I hate restrained bet limits. Although my current methodology seldom requires bet of more than 15 units. ..."

     Yes , I can only imagine how burdensome that must be to you.


Next News Story: "ALBALAHA COMING TO AMERICA"

"...Maybe some day. I do not want to feature in the black book of casinos. Thanks for the best wishes..."

     Good thinking--To help with that worry and to "lay low" or "fly under the radar",...etc, you could maybe consider playing under an alias (e.g., Kung Fubac ).

"...Thanks for the best wishes.."

You are welcome.

QuoteHi Albalaha--I see youre still in the laboratory.

     It is my forte. I am into something everyone shies away to even discuss. A logical and mathematical way to earn from casinos.

QuoteGood thinking--To help with that worry and to "lay low" or "fly under the radar",...etc, you could maybe consider playing under an alias (e.g., Kung Fubac ).

Well, it is not so easy. I need a team to play my way all over. It is tough to find even one reliable person. I m playing myself online these days and haven't seen any losing session so far. Let's see how it goes further.

Sir,
after reading all your posts and contemplating hard your ideas,
it seems that, you are 100% confident in your unique mm,
then your real headache, and no1 enemy, is, extreme variance!
Then if, only if, if you could, have a way to hit "within math" , then you will not lose...
But then again, you say, it is impossible, to devise a betting selection that never hit extreme..(?)

Wong,
          I m tired of answering your single query in hundreds of way. We do not need to beat the extreme, we just need to surpass that with least harm possible. Whatever way we can play, randomness can beat that momentarily. It is always better to be prepared for that instead of dreaming of beating that too. Extreme cases are rare too and if they do not take away too much money, why keep bothering about them? Such silly thinking give birth to martingale type ideas that kills us finally. Next time if you asked how to beat the extreme, you will be in my ignore list. Just think of beating the long run consequences with a pre planned strategy.

Sir,
If your mm can +50, and -100,
then, there no law say you can't bet both side.
Say, have two person ,
bet with your mm,
if next 100bet produce within math, then both will win +50.
if extreme hit, then
1 person will -100, and the other +50, the end only lose -50.
what you think?

Quote from: PatternAnalys on May 13, 2021, 06:44:37 AM
Sir,
If your mm can +50, and -100,
then, there no law say you can't bet both side.
Say, have two person ,
bet with your mm,
if next 100bet produce within math, then both will win +50.
if extreme hit, then
1 person will -100, and the other +50, the end only lose -50.
what you think?

Betting both sides have no advantage. First, it will be difficult to compute together and bet in a real casino. Secondly, it will appear weird and will draw the attention of the casino. Since extreme will hit rarely(only in 5% cases, my way) it is not intriguing. I agree that while I will lose -100, I should win +50 easily too but not necessarily. I will evaluate those cases playing both sides to answer you.

I have made two variations of my Millionaire's plan. One is meant for being played calmly by one person to one side, i.e. Player or banker.
Another is super aggressive one. That too wins in below average cases. So if I play both sides with the aggressive approach, I will win for sure. If one side is doing well, it will win higher betting that and at the same time loser one will lose lesser. I think it is a dream come true. Wong, your hint of playing both sides could win great here. Thanks for the brainstorming. I will come back with my tests soon.

I have tried to play both sides with +50/-100 targets and winning in most of the sessions in both ways. Apparently +50 in both sides are taking different timeframes. Below average times for one side is great time for others. I wonder if it ends the game, my way or there is something that I m still lacking. Should I finish both sides for my targets or leave at a good average winning stage taken both sides together? Any thoughts?