I opened this topic if anybody has any query regarding that. Trolls and buffoons please avoid writing here and they are free to make their own topics anywhere else.

Does yer style require the 3000 units bankroll? And, what is the price, hey hey?

I thought you started to hate me for selling this module but anyways, I answer you. 3000 units are lifetime bankroll and only a maximum of 300 units buy-in could be required in any session. If someone dreams of bending the casino with 10-20 chips, he is only fooling himself. 300 units is meant for extreme of the extreme cases. It is a kind of ultimate stop loss that is very rare(even the 6 horror sessions did not get that) but not impossible. Similarly, it is not impossible to even lose lifetime bankroll if someone gets unlucky in every day of his play. It is although as much remote as getting 30 reds in a row.

I hope it should be enough for you.

Hi Albalaha,

Thanks for answering my question regarding your system. But Esoito raised a good point - why does the price of the system vary? And why should a "deserving" person get it for free? What does "deserving" mean anyway?

And you've avoided answering Soxfan's question about the price. Why can't you give us a straight answer on this?

Price will subject to the existing knowledge and skill that the buyer has already. Asking price will be my prerogative and buying or not will be buyer's. I need not answer this to trolls and buffoons of the forum who write no positive topic that adds any value to the forum. This is not for rookies or daydreamers or frustrated players lurking here and there to find a panacea. It is an approach to play that makes a player a perfect gambler who has much more chances to win than lose a session and in overall. To play this way, will be possible for the toughest of players. A hasty player will not be able to use this module.

              This method keeps in mind the following principals:
1. Law of small numbers: anything is possible in very short span. Many smarta** players claim otherwise but in reality none can control the outcome of the game. It could be very harsh momentarily beyond the capacity of any MM to get a win there.

2. Law of large numbers: In large run, things get to normalcy in overall.

3. Regression towards mean: After a very highly skewed stretch the next stretch is more likely to be closer to the mean value(average). There is a big problem in the application of this theory though. We can not determine the stretch after which regression should work but my Positive gambling module has a way to optimize this too.

4. Extreme Variance management: I have some parameters that try to remove the worst of worst sessions from our plays. If the worst still creeps in, we can still survive and win back without betting too huge.

Hello
question
I agree "your module" is winning
,but
How many wins it makes?
example
in 10,000 spins
how many Bets?
how many Wins?
how many Loss?
and these results are by using positive betting or pure bet selection?

No betselection gives you any edge by itself. I do not want to repeat that again and again.

We do not know beforehand the number of wins vs losses we will get, it is also a blunt truth. My methodology tries to avoid the worst and then survive if we still get the worse and tries to win back after that phase passes and we get close to average. The session may end in 50 spins or it may drag for upto 500 spins.

all right....
There is no edge.... 
I feel like Neo from the matrix
"Тhe truth is that, There is no spoon ." he he

Let me ask another way
in 10,000 spins
how many Bets on average we are going to make?
How much  R.O.I. (Return on investment (betting)) we gonna make?  (in units;tokens)

In my simulations, we earn in the ratio of our bets placed. Say we bet only 150 spins in 1000, we need to see the real ratio there. We can earn 1 to 3 units per 10 bets placed. Any estimation is estimation only as every session could be a very different story from the other. Remember, we are not playing all over, for the sake of ultimate safety.

Quote from: Albalaha on May 29, 2016, 09:50:40 AM
Say we bet only 150 spins in 1000, we need to see the real ratio there. We can earn 1 to 3 units per 10 bets placed.

That equates to about 30 units won per 1000 spins.

IMO that's not too bad, and pretty good if you can guarantee it.

But can you guarantee it?

Or should we expect to factor in losing sequences of 1000 spins, which then reduces the 30 unit average?

A winning system can't be winning if it isn't consistent. So 1-3 units per 10 bets is great if it's a consistent average. A couple more questions-

In your simulations, what is the approximate largest bet?

and

What is the largest drawdown?

Just one more I thought of. Is the system completely mechanical? Some systems have a discretionary element which gives a seller a get-out clause, so if the system fails then the seller can blame the player for not playing it right. If success depends on guessing or "experience" or any of that BS I'm not interested.

@Jake,
        First of all you should not be interested in gambling alone as you stated to earn only E300 a month that is barely sufficient to feed you. Gambling is meant for affluent class people who has "extra" money and time for this.

Edit: This is for Betjack and not for Jake if both are different.
http://albalaha.lefora.com/topic/19400619/Who-may-gamble-and-who-should-not#.V0rQP_l97IU

           Anyways, your questions are wise enough and deserves answers:
Max bet: It is rare to get over 25 units but upto 50 units of max bet could be possible in different scenarios.
Max DD: I would ask to quit for the day if losses reach -300 units a day.

QuoteIs the system completely mechanical? Some systems have a discretionary element which gives a seller a get-out clause, so if the system fails then the seller can blame the player for not playing it right. If it depends on guessing or "experience"

Yes, it is purely mechanical with all rules very clear and no ambiguity. The system has no guarantee of "no loss ever possible". Although the entire methodology takes care of various types of variance yet there can be sessions where one loses 300 units. If you happen to get that much rarity in successive days somehow, you can lose the entire lifetime bankroll of 3000 units as well. Too remote and weird but not impossible mathematically. Understanding what randomness can offer is the core of positive gambling.

Quote from: Albalaha on May 29, 2016, 11:20:00 AM
@Jake,
        First of all you should not be interested in gambling alone as you stated to earn only E300 a month that is barely sufficient to feed you.

Where did I say that? Anyway it's not true because I have a good income from my own business. Gambling is just a hobby and a sideline for me.

Thanks for answering my questions.

Quote from: Albalaha on May 29, 2016, 11:20:00 AM

Max DD: I would ask to quit for the day if losses reach -300 units a day.

Going by your maths, if a -300 unit DD happens, that puts buyers in a 10,000 spin recovery period... a 10,000 SPIN RECOVERY PERIOD!

God help them if they get a second -300 unit drawdown while they're at it.

Quote from: greenguy on June 03, 2016, 07:53:24 AM
Going by your maths, if a -300 unit DD happens, that puts buyers in a 10,000 spin recovery period... a 10,000 SPIN RECOVERY PERIOD!

God help them if they get a second -300 unit drawdown while they're at it.

Oh really!!!!
             From where you got this revelation green sucker? This trolling buffoon along with its baldy friend who licked my feet for two years are acting oversmart here.

            With this methodology stop losses are very rare and recoveries are very easy. That is what makes it positive gambling.
Positive Gambling= A positive approach of playing that gives a positive chance to be ahead in long run unlike any other system ever created.