Well, Well, Well, clearing my throat, eyes opening wide, total clarity and a new sense of ‘perkiness’.Really, no different than gambling message boards, baccarat, table games, players like myself and you against the casinos, some knowledgeable people after walking down that long road of ‘experience and years of casino play’ surviving, researching, discovering, learning, applying, looking, trying things, etc., etc., and so on and so forth…
…………………………. Not one bit different. Then the ‘other side’ comes along and says, “cannot be done’, ‘you will fail’, ‘you have to fail’, ‘no way can you profit because you do not know how to play’, and every version and offspring of things like those. Then when I post a picture of $8,000.00 profit from a $700.00 buy-in after 1 hour of play, or a $23,000.00 profit after a 3 hour play with a $1,400.00 buy-in, the ‘other side’ is saying such things as, ‘you are ghetto’, ‘you lie’, ‘you cannot do what you did without only being lucky’, ‘you copy and paste fallacies into a story to boast about yourself with one-way conversations’, etc., etc., and so on and so forth…………….Pretty much the same as those people preaching in the 1970’s and then when someone actually comes and does it without having the Harvard, the Yale, The Tufts, The MIT, the long drawn out political and family ties, what they attempted to do for decades in a year, a friggin year-12 months and a few weeks---he did what that other side prayed for, wished for, attempted to do, televised and sung about and said we needed to do---he did it! But, no fanfare, no ‘world’s greatest moment’, no signs being held up—‘So and So for the Nobel Peace Prize’, etc., etc. I would wager my last food money that, if the previous person was in still in office and did what just happened, there would be 24/7 non-stop praise, ticket tape parades and rolls of red carpet from Singapore back to the White House for that person. People in bulk would be lining the streets of Washington DC, bending and bowing as that person came back from the initial start of the 9 innings, the initial agreement that might—should—is a start—very possibly and the only way to lead us, lead the world into a better place and a real Peace Agreement of the greatest importance and right up there with the Berlin Wall and the Russia stuff. But……………………………………excuse me…………………but…………………heck, let’s go on for a bit.
Critics reveal themselves----Kept on, Over & over & over & over & over & over, repetitiously to the max.
"Lack of engagement strategy.
Sliding towards war, definitely war by next summer". (Nationally broadcast prime time late 2017)
"He could and will literally trigger a controversy". (Nationally broadcast prime time summer 2017)
"Frustration and fury ruptures alliances and threatens agenda, we are on the path to World War III, not one doubt or anything else pointing in any other direction". (Nationally broadcast fall prime time 2017)
You are all wrong, wrong---not enough time to list you all that are wrong about:
The Pro-Life Commitment
The Trade Policies
And, Many Other Things & Areas
I don’t even want to say who got up on national prime time television repeatedly and said, ……”He needs control—He is an absolute authoritarian”………, etc.
Went in, shook hands and signed what will ultimately should and will become a peace agreement. My God! It is just the first inning of a 9 inning game. Has to start somewhere, it has been nowhere with possible disastrous, deadly and ugly results no matter if we engaged in what everyone said we would, no—he was bringing us to, even though he had nothing to do with the origin of the beginning of it. He accomplished what no other person has been able to consummate in decades, many decades, many people, collectively no less than hundreds of people, possibly thousands.
Let’s see, what else? Just a few quotes from the ‘losers’ or should I say, the side that did not prevail?
Oh yeah, “empty words”, “lots of flags”, “lots of ceremony”, “lots of blowing one’s own horns”, “thriving for egotistical publicity and self-posturing awareness thrown out in front of everyone”. I have lots more—just wanted to save my legal pads and ink in attempting to gather them all, LOL.
“Don’t necessarily lead to the results we hope for, actually”……………………… I just could not resist to add that one!
But, all they talked about in the 1970’s was “All we are saying is give peace a chance”. What the heck happened to that?
Seriously, that was preach, said, recited, taught, talked about, sung about, protested for and became the subject matter of almost everything in the 1970’s and persisted for many many years. That was originated from, bolstered and promoted by the ‘other’ side.
All the concerts, all the protests, all the ideology. All that was talked about, was to shake hands and have a more peaceful planet. Let me ask you something…..Was that only for the lyrics and the cause of the music? Seriously?
Staggering, every day to realize how self-unaware and lack of knowledge. Said about someone in the news these days. Hey----guys! Also said about myself by some on this board as well! Correct, no? Again, seriously?
Big eyes, big deal! Distract, talk, lie, and cheat, so what? He tunes them out and does what he has to do. Undeterred by their satire. Because he is too busy winning. That is why. Winning is not always popular. Not even in the casino. Look at the other players, look at the staff, look at your casino host, look at the by standers.
Same thing! Seriously! 110% spot-on same. The other players look at you with a snicker at best, no one patting you on the back unless you have a real outside the casino family member or friend there with you. The other players are looking at you like you are some jerk. The staff has their arms folded. Your host is on her cell phone to the general manager of the casino when you are up $25,000.0 or $40,000.00 getting an earful to make sure you stay the night, etc., etc. The dealers like it if they get to keep their own tips and you are tipping them well or they are gamblers themselves, but even the other dealers do not like you winning, at least many of them anyway. Same, do different, think about it!!!Rip up the old play-book! It is complicated, but not really that hard. Just do what actually works. Unlike the play books, unlike the person you took his place, job or even seat at the casino. Anything is possible, why do you, me or them—have to follow in anyone’s footsteps?
Why? He was not bound by the old ways of doing things. Why should I be at the casino? Why? Because the playbooks say that if I do ‘so and so’ for 10,000.000 hands of baccarat I will win 1.26%? Or, so and so on the board says with his ‘un shown’ proof that he placed 3,769 wagers and won 53% of them because he wagered for ‘such and such’ after ‘so and so’ was presented? Seriously?
Bring common sense into the equation. Try something different---might not work—but you have to try something new. Maybe you did not invent it, maybe you read 4 things about playing baccarat and you took a few things out of those, merged those with other things and yet---implemented those into a form of play that is different than the others.
Maybe they subscribe to the 1’s and 2’s and pay attention to the 3’s, governing themselves for what ‘absolutely has to happen’, that in all reality---‘might not happen at all’, but according to the ‘other guys/side’ it really has to happen because it did so better than 50% in all tests, computer modules and results as produced by the well-known and most respected people in baccarat, etc. But then I do remember the shoe a couple of weeks ago with the first two sections, the first 40 hands or so of all 1’s and 2’s and the occasional 3. No one really did anything except push their wagers back and forth, won and lost. Lost a few and quickly recovered. Then, I do remember and remember very well, the ‘9-9’ Natural tie after the second Banker. Everyone on the Player, of course it ‘just had to cut’, it ‘had to’! Nope. 8 Beautiful Bankers with 3 Forutne-7’s, followed by a Player Panda 8, followed by a single Banker, followed by 12 Beautiful Players with 4 additional Panda 8’s within those 12. WOW, simply WOW.
The game, the aura, the surrounding, the players, the staff, the feel in the air, what has happened and what might happen, what is frequent or what is just the possibility. The players in general will keep almost everyone else unstable, not facing it and unbalanced. Huge words, but it is a huge game. It has unlimited possibilities for those with clear vision, complete consciousness and the ability to sit and view it from outside of any and all emotions.
Once you understand, are able to maintain consciousness and be in correct frame-of-mind, you will stay on balance instead of unusually being off-balance and subjecting yourself to a constant loss of your buy-ins and in the constant state-of-mind as to how to catch up and recover. Step aside guy---you are off-balance and nothing else, you will never be able to totally understand what the game’s weak points and opportunities really are. You subjected yourself to the foolish talk of the internet and the people with one of two motives. 1) They are here to sell something; 2) They are here for the drama to throw side-ways statements, pun and spar. Period.Wrap-Up:
The first of 9 innings is when you sit down and buy-in at the table. You don’t win or lose in the start. You only do those things throughout the game. But you set the pace, the atmosphere and the continuance or the discontinuance—according to the shoe presentments and what you capitalize on or not. The sweep of history will reveal all. Always does. The sweep of the shoe will reveal all as well. Problem is, almost every player will attempt to set his wagering program and attack in relationship to the sweep. It does not work that way. The exact same as the enemy sending his entire military force up one road in consecutive and total cumulative force. If they did that, all we would have to do is be on the front line with everything we had at the head of the path and take them all out, war finished, no problem. But in reality—if just doesn’t work like that. The key to it is to be caught in a section after a turning point, that you are conscious of and shaking the hand of the shoe.
Here is a recap, with pictures, songs and the real deal. IMO, not a bad 6:49 to spend with a cup of coffee. You might not agree, of course, but it is fact and it happened. The same as myself being at a baccarat table with my $300.00 that just won, I parlayed it to $600.00 and then increased it to $900.00 and pulled my risk capital of the initial $300.00 back and watched the 12 additional Bankers come out in a row---stacking each $900.00 up in front of me, while everyone played for the Player cut that just had to come out, eventually and missed the Banker run. I have to add, they all had their mouths partially opened in disbelieved as it all happened and every hand made a Banker win. (You can change the 'Banker run' to a '15 hand chop-chop', to '16 pairs of doubles', to a '1-2-3-3-2-1' that happened twice in a row, doesn't really matter, whatever).
INGRAHAM: Pride, bitterness, refusal.......http://www.foxnews.com/shows/ingraham-angle.html
ALRELAX: Pride, (Oh well, better stop here)https://betselection.cc/alrelax's-blog/