Consider this simple method.

Our plan is to detect when a natural point will come out, no matter which side will be kissed by such natural.

The probability any natural will come out is 34.1%, a slight higher than a dozen will show up at roulette.

Without any doubt, when a natural comes out a symmetrical hand will be formed, meaning that betting banker is a fool option.

At some extent, any natural apparition translates into an idi.ot choice (when wagering B) and a fair situation when wagering P.

Since a 34.1% probability is way higher than a 8.4% probability, we know that a back to back probability is quite more likely even though half considered (as we can't bet both sides).

Naturally there are many levels where a natural could come out, a back to back probability is a zero gap, a natural followed by another different hand is a 1-gap probability and so on.

Differently to roulette, the overall natural probability per any shoe is more restricted as we can't cancel 8s and 9s and zero value cards from the deck.

Especially whether 8s and 9s should be more ore less concentrated on some portions of the deck.

Naturally a perfect 8s/9s pace is out of order for obvious reasons and we still have to fight other less likely card combinations forming a natural.

Same about asym hands.

What we really want when betting Banker is the asym hand production and nothing else.

Everything different from that is a long term EV- move, unless our B bets are able to catch a better than 8.4% probability.

Coincidentally such probability is nearly half of the probability to get a natural on either side.

Instead of guessing which side will win, we should try to focus about those two probabilities, as they are the most likely to produce the actual outcomes. Itlr.

as.