+ Register

[alrelax]

Mostly influenced by systems and con sellers of some trash and if not those types, the majority of the rest are the drama on-line trash talkers that are mostly one liners attempting to see how far they can push the admins and moderators without being banned or sanctioned.  In other words, the have nothing to really contributed except standing on the corner attempting to bully the passersby rela person with a real interest. 

My thoughts:  3/4/19  Part 1 of 3.


I am totally floored.  Sitting and watching these days for the most part at baccarat tables.  It is redundant, redundant to the likes of believing such short garbage written on the internet and repeated among the people playing the game.  Sad, but absolutely true without question. 

First is the 1s and 2s thing.  What a grind, a trap and a joke that makes me laugh yet feel sorry for the innocent people told with such great conviction by others, that exactly those wagers will make you all kinds of money in this game.  A sure and certain way to grind yourself into frustration and fluster without a single doubt.  If you call me a complete jerk and writing complete falsehoods, shoot some real pictures of the boards, your win-loss statements from the casino, etc., and post it.  Call me out on this. 

For those of you that do not know me or taken the time to read my past writings, I play only brick and mortar real casinos in the USA.  I do not play on line, I do not post solely on theory or running it all on a computer and posting fantasy and desires and math stats.  Nothing against them, except they do not replicate what actually happens within 1 or 3 or 5 or 10 shoes of the game in real time life.  Period. 

What all the doubt in baccarat?  Because of the relentless members of certain forums on their computer theory, computer statistical results and everything else in relation to those areas.  Half of them attempt to convert mathematics to gambling profit that will never realize true overall in a casino, and the other half are attempting to lead most people to losing their hard-earned money through a form of set mechanical systems or triggers that may or may not happen, period. 

I breeze through other forums and websites occasionally, lots less these days then a few years ago.  Meaning, the real discussion on actual bac casino play with strategies, results, tips and even phone calls among the non-fake members.  The highest majority is drama, bickering, calling out with grade school mentalities over toys or food or believes in life, etc.  I read some of them just to stay on top and informed as to what the latest and greatest might be.  I guess?  I do not really know why I waste my time.

[alrelax]

My Thoughts:  Part 2 of 3.  3/4/19

Yesterday at bac.  Watch two types.  One always on the Banker.  Most every hand as well as others always on something, never changing, never alternating, a strict belief in something is or must come out.  The other type is clearly playing the 1s and the 2s as well as against anything strong.  Strong meaning a repeat, whether that is repeating streaks, true chop-chop, doubles, triples, or any other clear and present pattern creating an event. 

Both of those types have about 10% of the game understood, but not the whole picture.  Which is, both sides win and both sides lose.  Coupled with, endless loops, meaning no real gain and lost energy and eventual burn out or fruitless attempts at capitalizing on the real presentments that baccarat does present in random and non-classifying mechanical order.

The both miss out of strong events.  Repeating streaks, repeating 2s, alternating pure chop-chop and many other types of presentments.  Why?  Because they are focused on certain triggers and those triggers may or may not present themselves.  The confusing and frustrating part is when they do and then fail to present once again, when those same triggers reappear.  I hope I said that clear enough this time?

And false positives as well.  Something which defines a super important aspect of baccarat and few really understand.  Ever drive on ice?  Seriously.  Where the weather was freezing, then it got unseasonably warm, like back into the 40s even low 50s?  The rain comes and in a few hours the temperature drops once again to well below 30 and the winds pick up to 20-35 MPH.  All the rain freezes, then fresh powdery snow follows.  Boom!  Mass disaster entails.  Even with people that lived in the same wintery stuff for decades.  Because they drive the same streets, they are over confident.  They know those streets well.  The streets were de-iced, sand and ice melt laid down.  Forgetting what it was or is.  Faster and faster those drive.  The first few blocks, so very careful.  Then subconsciously their confidence builds, and they know the street are safe once again. 

The nest section of highway or following few blocks in town whatever, has a couple inches of ice covered by that fresh snow.  The same stuff that same driver has been driving on.  His car goes sideways within a second or two.  His car rams into the concrete pole or another car or goes down the ditch and rolls over.  Oops.  I did not realize the conditions. 

Same thing at baccarat, not one bit of difference.  None.  1s and 2s, the most frequent results according to the statistics.  The Banker makes statistically a greater amount of hands then the Players side does.  Countless other statistical results attempting to be applied to the extremely short amount of hands or shoes you will play.  Of course, the defense if asked as to why they think that, would be something along the lines of; Oh, yeah, I might lose a few but it must come back around because of the math and the stats of the game. 

You never sat down at a shoe and saw 1 Banker then 4 Players, 1 Banker followed again by 6 Players, 1 Banker followed by 3 Players, 1 Banker followed by 9 more Players?  And most everyone is wagering on the Banker to come back?  Or the complete opposite with the Player dominating?   

You never saw a shoe with a long series of all 2s or pure alternating chops?  You never saw a shoe that is the exact opposite of the one you just sat in front of for the past 2 hours?

You never saw a shoe that replicated almost the same results of the previous shoe or two?  You never saw a shoe or 2 or 3 shoes or even 4 shoes, that were all extremely contrary to each other, everything about them?

Get the point? 

[alrelax]

My Thoughts:  Part 3 of 3.   3/4/19


Get the point?  I have been writing and preaching, when it is there it is present.  It is an event no matter how it is presented.  Sections & Turning Points.  Those can be applied to every single shoe, unlike the majority of everything that has been brought forward and following or wagering on.  Such as a Banker or a Player because it made or did not make something. 

The person the repeatedly wagers for those repeats or that cut, will win some of them and the false positives that they receive from their baccarat knowledge, convinces themselves to wager that same thing again and again, depleting his buy in and his bank roll because he will limit his realization of what the game produces without capitalizing on the real advantages of baccarat. 

Reason being, we are all too hung up on convincing ourselves that we have an advantage and therefore you must tangibly turn that into reality when you cannot.  The proper way to view it is, realizing the game produces intangible presentments that equal events and when they do, you will wager on those and take advantage of them and declassify yourself as an advantaged player.

Problem is really compounded in the subconscious psychology that takes over within the egotistically and self-assured advantaged player that knows he can beat the game.  Of course, it just compounds itself at the end of the session he just lost his buy in because his defensive is simply, next time. 

DISCLOUSRE:  The above 3 parts are all in my opinion and of course does not apply to you, the advantaged experienced player that beats the game of baccarat almost every time you play it.