+ Register

[tdx]

1. Actually they are 12 columns, not 12 rows.

2. Sounds like a mechanical system...which will ultimately fail

3. How about using only 3 or 5 columns and use the same technique of betting opposite of last decision and then looking for a pattern of the  wins lor losses in each column - (such as betting for a win if the column show 3 wins in a row or betting a chop of the wins and losses of the column such as if the column shows a win, loss win, loss, then bet for a win)     .......of course patterns appear and disappear, and like beauty, are in the eye of the beholder,  but that is what makes bac challenging.......also using only 3 or 5 columns will give you more decisions, which will give you more decisions for the patterns to develop.

Maybe use a separate bankroll and separate MM for each of the 3 or 5 columns ?

Actually assuming you look for betting for or against the last decision will not make a difference if you are looking for patterns of the wins and losses.....all you are doing is changing a win to a loss and a loss to a win and looking for pattern of the wins and losses to bet for or against.

Everyone playing bac will eventually bet for or against a patterm no matter what semantics they use, they are betting patterns.

[RouletteGhost]

"Rows of 12" is accurate as is "12 columns"

If i had said "12 rows" that would be innacurate

[RouletteGhost]

Saying mechanical system makes it sound bad

In reality its flat betting a 50 50 chance