+ Register

[alrelax]

You know, many have said on this board something referencing how they deduce down what is left in the shoe and how they get an advantage, etc.

Well, that is a crock.  A total crock of fabricated wishful fallacy!  I went ahead last night and showed my buddy 12 cards:

4 face cards
2-9's
1-4
1-5
1-8
1-Ace
2-6's

A minimum of 2 hands and a max of maybe 3 hands.  I showed them to him and he wrote them down.  I shuffled them and dealt them. 

I did the deal like 15 times with every time except for one being different.  He could not get one of them correct with what was going to come out.  Not banker or player, meaning what cards would end up where.  Even when I told him I had the 9 or the 8 as the first card, the majority of the times the Banker won the hand anyways. 

But of course I am not the level or have the experience of the mathematicians and the statisticians here on this board. 

Just this tiny amount of cards leaves so many possibilities of what could happen for either the Player or the Banker. 

Why do you all concentrate on the wrong things?  Why do you all perpetrate such fallacy?  Same as the shuffle master being able to rig a shoe in the casinos favor—even if that was a possibility, once the deck is cut whatever was set up is forever changed in that shoe anyways.