+ Register

[alrelax]

The past couple of years and moving into the present, I have noticed without a doubt, the general Bac playing crowd is wagering predominantly for the CUT the highest majority of the times. 

Or, they are wagering for the 1-2 or the 2-1 type of presentments.  No matter what the shoe is actually presenting, how strong or what it has presented. 

And I am referring to even strong streaks that form without any previous streaks in the shoe, just for example.  I see fewer and fewer people capitalizing on anything along the lines of streaks, chop-chop, doubles, triples or anything of the likes. 

They absolutely get clobbered, hands down, almost every time.  Yes they win a little bit and then they just continue and continue. 

I really do not understand it, as I have written about, prior to 2005(ish) the Bac tables would all have the highest majority of players wagering together in full camaraderie and really hurting the house quite often.  I rarely see that any longer.  I would have to say, it is a complete turnaround in the way the game is perceived and played these days.

Maybe it is the vast information out there, systems, tutors, YouTube scams/systems, etc., etc.?  I do not know exactly but I have to believe that it is partly due to the internet and the instant everything available more so these days than prior to 2005(ish) and 2000. 

[alrelax]

Such a perfect  example of do's and don'ts at the Bac table last nite.

Will post a couple pics later.

[alrelax]

As I have written about many times. 

Low ties produce an abundance of the hands clumping together and presenting whatever it has been, chop-chop, doubles, streaks, weak or strong, whatever.  But somehow 0-1-2-3 ties will present just that. 

Here is a shoe we hit is hard, real hard for the 15th hands or so. 

F-7 on Hand 8.  I have written extensively about the first F-7 coming in the first 10 hands, more often than not.

As well, my second established finding is a favored Hands 12-17 to produce a second or a first F-7.  Here are the 2nd and 3rd F7s of the shoe on Hands 14 and 16.  There were two additional F7s as well within this same shoe. 

[attachimg=1]

Here is another shoe, classic Banker dominating.  But I have to say, because so many believe just wager the Banker all the time.  Player usually will not finish with such a deficit as this one.  If you play/wager for the Banker, I have countless shoes that would wipe you out just as easy, shoe after shoe after shoe with Player side domination. 

[attachimg=2]