+ Register

[Sputnik]

 Now great minds will read this and understand the concept.
I will show two things and if you don't understand you can look at the Spuntik's March topic at this forum board.

Personal I considering using both, with real money at my local casino.
This is only a blueprint and you need to develop and tweak with a personal touch.

Raw explanation.

Method 1

I got inspired by Asymbac when he talks about his doubles to become three in a row using the banker side.
Then I come up with a pretty amazing solution for any even-money game.

Two sequences out of three will be used with this method.

Singles and series of two.
Singles and series of three or higher.
And we skip Series of two and series of three or higher.

Each event is by itself one event.

Singles are one event.
A series of two are one event.
Series of three or higher are one event.

There are two things that can happen using the two sequences above when you cut the random bits into sequences, each sequence by itself, own section.
One sequence can have one event each showing to become a triplet and if not you will have a bias sequence with at least two events repeating for three times or more in a row.

Now we have a raw explanation again.
In the long run, do we have 1000 singles and 500 series of two and 250 series of three, but as we use series of three or higher as one event they are equal or greater than series of two with the amount
500 with my example, so figure 250 is not correct.

And in the short run, you can expect a series of two and series of three or higher with the same strike ratio as singles, because there are as many singles as there is series.
Let me repeat the above again, 1000 singles and 500 series of two and 500 series of three or higher.
1000 versus 1000.

The odds are 1 in 3 to get one of the events to show in the short run.
We are betting against each sequence to not getting a greater bias then five or more in a row, with a particular touch.
The singles in each sequence are not going to grow more than four or more times in a row and the whole sequence minimum amount with two events will be five.

For example B P BB P

Now we bet there will be one more series of two or a series of three or higher for the next three attempts.
They have a very high likelihood of strike once within the next three attempts because two events to strike five times or more in a row has less likelihood.

Look at the Asymbac approach where you have one banker double and you bet that one of the next two bankers double will become three in a row, due to the slight advantage of the banker.
But I only need a series of two or three or higher to achieve the same thing, betting against a bias sequence to become less than five in a row.

Let me twist it, let's say you have to single bankers B B and one double banker BB within the next three attempts I will have at least one double banker or three or higher in a row.
Because the slight advantage of the banker side hitting more frequent overall where a series with that particular situation has a higher likelihood to happen.

A short RNG sampel

LW LW W W W LW LLL W W W LLL W W LW W W W W W LW LLW LW W LW

Another good thing about this approach is that you can use a smooth variant of Hollandish Progression - staking 111 222 333 444 555 and so on - I have very difficult to see this way of playing to lose money.

One more example with the other sequence.
BBBB B P her you would for a series of two or three or higher, betting against a bias sequence with five or more in a row.

The reason this work is that you can expect the odds 1 in 3 in the short run with variance and fluctuation.

Pst ... here is a little secret the 50/50 need to make at least five swings (singles) to the other side to lose the three attempts and among them, you have at least one series.
And a tight players use one sequence only to get less variance and more reliable periodic cycles overall.

Next, I will post method two ...


Cheers

[Sputnik]

This is the expectation with 300 RNG outcomes playing one sequence by itself.

Singles and series of three or higher in any combination - LW W LLL W LLL W W W W W LW W - 12 attacks

Singles and series of two in any combination - LW W W LW W W W LW W LW LLW W - 12 attacks

First had two losing sequences and the second one none.

Cheers

[AsymBacGuy]

Nice.

Say we got this sequence B P B P B P BBB P B P B P B
What are your results?

as. 

[Sputnik]

Hi ...

Well, that is the catch and the underlying reasons why this work.
Someone could say that is similar betting against two's not becoming five in a row.
But then you have the expectation of one event to show, you bet for one single isolated event to show.

In Sputnik's March, you have three events that define the random distribution and each section of random bits.
You get waves with two events happening with the odds onE in three, that is how the random bits are sorted and no other world exists.

With your example above we would have maybe lost three bets depending on how you would play.
If we would play Banker side by it self we don't know if that sequence would won or lose.
B P B P B P BBB P B P B P B - L L ?
If we would play both Banker and Player side we would lose three bets.
B P B P B P BBB P B P B P B - L L L


Here is a random org file where 1 stands for Player and 2 stands for Banker.

2
2
1
1
1
2


1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1


2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2


1
1
2
1


2
2
2
2
1
1
2


1
2
1
2
2


1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1


2
2
2
1
2
2


1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1


2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1


2
1
2
2
1


2
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1


2
2
1
2
2
2
2


1
2
1
1
1


2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1


2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2


1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1


2
1
2
2


1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1


2
1
2
1
2
2
1


2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2


1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1


2
1
2
2
1
1

2
2
2
1
2
2


1
2
2
2
1
1


2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2


1
1
2
1


2
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
2


1
2
2
1
2
1
1

2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2


1
1
2
2
2
1
1


2
1
2
1
2
2


1
1
1
2
1
1






         

[AsymBacGuy]

Ok thanks!

Different approach, still the concept remains the same.

as.

[Sputnik]

Well, I will implement this and will test with real results using Baccarat Buster 2 and post the results.
You have to understand that Baccarat Buster 2 is not a random RNG generate baccarat results.

Quote:
The card numbers are kept in a text file just as though they were stacked on the table. When the game starts
The program reads the values of the cards into memory. Now the deck is in memory. I have created code that will
physically shuffle those cards per the user?s definition (any casino shuffle definition). Two default shuffles
come with the software. You can define and save as many shuffles as you wish and play against any of them.
As long as the program has been on the market no one has been able to duplicate this process, it took me over
A year to develop the code.

Understanding the playing deck

There is a file on your hard disk that contains all of the numbers of the cards. There are eight files, 1 has 52 cards another has 104 (for 2 decks) another has 3 decks etc. up to 8 decks.

When you start a new game the program opens one of these files and reads the contents into memory. For as long as you play the current session, they are kept in memory. When they are shuffled, they are shuffled in memory. The cards in the file on your hard disk are still in their original order. This is important to understand. This is how you use this feature.

For example, you set your players to play a certain logic and after viewing the Analysis screen you want to tweak it up a little and play again using the same sequence of cards to test your modifications. Or maybe you want to use the same deck of cards at a different casino to see what effect the shuffle has on the outcome.

This is where the Scramble feature comes in. Maybe you don't want to continue where you left off. By selecting to Scramble the deck, the program will do a wash on the cards after they are read into memory and start you off with a completely fresh sequence.

This is helpful when you modify your player logic and test it against the exact same sequence to see if it produced a greater profit. And it did. So, do it again but, Scramble the cards to see if it produces a profit against a different sequence of cards. Scrambling the cards does not affect the cards stored on the disk, just the cards in memory.

Cheers

[RouletteFan]

Thank you Sputnik for sharing this great discovery

and thank you for your dedication to roulette baccarat and sport betting

sharing valuable info and innovation coming from brilliant mind is very nice

Thanks

Philippe from France 

[roversi13]

Thanks,I appreciate you share the conclusions of your studies.
But....
A famous european baccarat "scientist" wrote in 1980:
"Tell me your method and i'll write down a shoe that make you lose.
Sooner or later you'll meet these negative decisions.
You can't "buy" a delai of them,even with a huge bkr"

[Sputnik]

60.000 placed bets with 1.7 House Edge
Each 100 placed bets sample has an 87% reversal (back to back) break even after one negative result.
So when you reach +2 units without being in the negative you stop and start over and when you get into the negative you break even.
That is flat betting.

Now the worst during one 100 placed bets sample among 60.000 placed bets with 100 placed bet samples is minus 35 units (happen once during 60.000 placed bets with 100 placed bets samples.)
The average loss peak during 100 placed bets samples is minus eight units.

My theory and understanding are that all systems lose.
But you soften the negative to get back to back and you increase the 87% with a smooth progression like 111 222 333 444 555 where you win twice at each level and are the same benchmark you recommend to beginner betting sports, maximum 5% of your bankroll.

Another theory is when you win half the money you are prepared to lose your regress and play with casino money.
This means two things in real life.
You need to lose twice to bust and you will not feel stressful over the fact that the losing sequence will hit you because the way toward the losing sequence has been shortened into half where you have your comfort zone and don't risk your own money.

Is very simple to illustrate, assume I am taking 111123 a total of nine units.
The selection need to win twice during six attempts.
When I reach +4 or +5 units I can regress and operate with casino money and be in my comfort zone.
Then if I bust i need to bust very soon again to lose twice in a row, if not then I will be operating with casino money again, which is a delay factor.
During this delay, you capitalize and use Up As You Win and push for more winnings using a more complex staking solution.

Cheers

[andrebac]

Hi Sputnik,
tx for sharing this interesting stuff...
could you provide a sample play by play, starting from a PB outcome?
thank you in advance
a

[PatternAnalys]

Sputnik,
since single=50%,
series2=25%
series3+ =25%.
Thus we bet SINGLE HAS MORE CHANCE IN 3SEQUENCE.

Here is Sputnik's,
random org file where 1 stands for Player and 2 stands for Banker.

2
2
1
1
1
2
WIN


1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
WIN

2
1
1
1
1
2
WIN

1
1
1
2
1
WIN

2


1
1
2
WIN
1


2
2
2
2
1
1LOSE

2


1
2WIN

1
2
2


1
1
1
1
1
1
1LOSE

2
2
1


2
2
2LOSE

1
2
2


1WIN

2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1


2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2LOSE

1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1LOSE


2
1
2
2LOSE

1


2
2
2
1
1
1LOSE

2
1
2WIN

1
2
1WIN


2
2
1
2
2
2
2LOSE


1
2
1
1
1LOSE


2
2
1
2
2LOSE

1
1
2
1WIN

2
1
1


2
2
2LOSE

1
2
1W

2
1
2W


1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1L


2
1
2
2L


1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1L


2
1
2W

1
2
2
1W


2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2L

1
2
1
1
1
1L

2
1
1
1
2W

1
2


1
1L

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1


2W

1
2
2
1
1L

2
2
2
1
2
2L


1
2
2
2
1
1L


2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2L

1
2
1W

2
1
2W

1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1L

2


1
1
2W

1


2
2
2
1
1L

2
2
1
1
1
2
2L


1
2
2
1W

2
1
1

2
2
2
2
2
2L

1
2


1
1L

2
2
2
1
1


2W

1
2
1W

2
2


1
1
1
2W

1
1

[PatternAnalys]

since single=50%,
series2=25%
series3+ =25%.
Thus we bet SINGLE,
lf lose.
we bet Double to hit,
IN 3SEQUENCE.

Here is same,
Sputnik's,
random org file where 1 stands for Player and 2 stands for Banker.

2
2
1
1
1
2
WIN


1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
WIN

2
1
1
1
1
2
WIN

1
1
1
2
1
WIN

2


1
1
2
WIN
1


2
2
2
2
1
1LOSE,win

2


1
2WIN

1
2
2


1
1
1
1
1
1
1LOSE,lose

2
2
1


2
2
2LOSE,lose

1
2
2


1WIN

2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1


2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2LOSElose

1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1LOSElose


2
1
2
2LOSEwin

1


2
2
2
1
1
1LOSElose

2
1
2WIN

1
2
1WIN


2
2
1
2
2
2
2LOSElose


1
2
1
1
1LOSElose


2
2
1
2
2LOSEwin

1
1
2
1WIN

2
1
1


2
2
2LOSElose

1
2
1W

2
1
2W


1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1L,lose


2
1
2
2L,win


1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1L,win


2
1
2W

1
2
2
1W


2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2L,lose

1
2
1
1
1
1Llose

2
1
1
1
2W

1
2


1
1Lwin

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1


2W

1
2
2
1
1Lwin

2
2
2
1
2
2Lwin


1
2
2
2
1
1Lwin


2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2L,lose

1
2
1W

2
1
2W

1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1L,lose

2


1
1
2W

1


2
2
2
1
1Lwin

2
2
1
1
1
2
2Lwin


1
2
2
1W

2
1
1

2
2
2
2
2
2L,lose

1
2


1
1Lwin

2
2
2
1
1


2W

1
2
1W

2
2


1
1
1
2W

1
1

bet one unit, for single, if lose,
bet two for double.

[PatternAnalys]

since single=50%,
series2=25%
series3+ =25%.
Thus we bet a SINGLE,
a double, and a triple WILL NOT
APPEAR,
IN 3SEQUENCE.

Here is THE SAME,
Sputnik's,
random org file where 1 stands for Player and 2 stands for Banker.

2
2
1
1
1
2
LOSE,
as all three appear


1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
lose

2
1
1
1
1
2
WIN

1
1
1
2
1
lose

2


1
1
2
WIN
1


2
2
2
2
1
1LOSE

2


1
2WIN

1
2
2


1
1
1
1
1
1
1LOSE

2
2
1


2
2
2LOSE

1
2
2


1WIN

2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1


2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2w

1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1w


2
1
2
2w

1


2
2
2
1
1
1LOSE

2
1
2WIN

1
2
1WIN


2
2
1
2
2
2
2LOSE


1
2
1
1
1w


2
2
1
2
2w

1
1
2
1WIN

2
1
1


2
2
2LOSE

1
2
1W

2
1
2W


1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1w


2
1
2
2w


1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1L


2
1
2W

1
2
2
1W


2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2w

1
2
1
1
1
1L

2
1
1
1
2W

1
2


1
1w

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1


2W

1
2
2
1
1w

2
2
2
1
2
2L


1
2
2
2
1
1L


2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2W

1
2
1W

2
1
2W

1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1L

2


1
1
2W

1


2
2
2
1
1L

2
2
1
1
1
2
2W


1
2
2
1W

2
1
1

2
2
2
2
2
2L

1
2


1
1W

2
2
2
1
1


2L

1
2
1W

2
2


1
1
1
2L

1
1

[spartakookie]

Hi Sputnik,

I have been using this for 8 months already on Marina Bays Sands and can tell you that this bet selection will need a big bankroll to make it work. One normal 8 deck shoes will allow to play around 11-14 times per shoe and u can have 3-4 losses (1s,2s , 3s) . That makes about 8 losses out of 12 bet spots with remaining some can be a draw (loss then win). Need a big bankroll to weather out the bad shoes (i seen 3 bad shoes in a row).

[spartakookie]

The trick is to reverse play the bet selection which i been really doing. It works much better . U just need to have a good money management. For those interested, u can test and see if it works better. From my weekly sessions for last 6 months, the results mostly floats around -2 to +2 On flat betting. Average no of bets per shoe is around 12-18 hands.