+ Register

[alrelax]

(Shoe Start)>>P-P-P-P-B-P-B-B-P-P-P-P-B-P-P-P-T-B-P-P-B-P-P-B-P-P-P-P-P-B-P-P-P-P-P-B-P-B-B-B-B-T-B-B-B-B

P-P-B-B-T-P-B-P-P-B-B-P-B-B-P-P-B-P-B-T-B-B-P-P-P-B-T-B-B-P<<<(Shoe End)


4 Players
4 Players again
3 Players
5 Players
5 Players again
Then the 8 Bankers came out. 

Then the 8 Bankers after the 9/9 natural tie came out after the first 4 Bankers appeared;

Banker was extremely weak, hardly any naturals, hardly any 3rd card wins at least increasing their initial value;

To me when that tie appeared with the way it was going, the preceding yes---it was time for the Banker to come on strong as it was doing in the first 4 hands of that 8 hand little streak.  Coupled with the point that Banker only had a single two repeat and all the rest were single Bankers.  The first 4 Bankers of that 8 Banker repeat was 3 Naturals in there as well.  Also, it was getting close to a +20 count for the Players just prior to that Banker run coming out.  It was 27 Players and 9 Bankers.  Making it +18 Players.  It was very low ties as well.  To me, that is the time to get on the Banker after the 3rd Banker or most definitely once that 4th Banker came out. 

Very rarely and I mean rarely do shoes finish with greater than +20 B or P.

So, the shoe finished 31 Banker and 40 Player.  Under 10 is most often than greater than +10, but happens.  Of course greater than +14/15 mark late in the shoe, say hand 60 or better and even more rare, is that finishing near or greater than +20. 

Of course, there are other variables I would personally factor in, but for sake of keeping this shorter, there is a synopsis of one scenario that happened the night before last at the casino, where there were some pretty nice presentments appearing.

[Johno-Egalite]

That was way too long for my attention span and time, way too much waffle.

Read the first paragraph and tuned out. What is confusing, is that you took all that time to type it out, yet have requested all your posts be removed??

I started playing online on Monday with a balance of about �750, yesterday my balance is;

[attach=1]

I'm averaging 100 units per session, in fact I over did it Wen and made 130u, yes  of course I've lost off the bat when I've first sat down at the table or playing online, sh1t happens.  I've lost against shoes, I lost against two back to back shoes last night, big deal.  Still finished with 100 units profit, took about 9 or 15, can't remember, about 35 mins per shoe, with less than 2 mins between shoes. but who's clock watching?

I'm already up today 30u, stopped to have something to eat and check "what's happening on the boards", now I'm back to it.

Byeeee

[alrelax]

Hi everyone. Long time no post so here goes something from me :-

1. Decisions made in Baccarat tournaments are made on a different basis as alluded to by Glen. Yes you have to keep an eye on your fellow gamers and see their bets and count their chips. I don?t normally participate in tournaments but once awhile I do. I remember in one tournament with a first prize money of > US$1 million, I was in the semi finals. Only the top guy in each table would qualify for the finals. Coming into the last hand (I think only 8 hands are played in the semi finals), the top guy was betting on Banker which was what I was going to bet on. But if Banker won, I would still not qualify, so I put my chips (there are limits) on Player. Player won! And I qualified for the finals. And got soundly trashed there 🤣🤣
2. I also understand Glen?s position on explaining his bet selections because in each shoe there are various other intangibles. The momentum of the game, the presence of a drunk moron losing his pants off, a player on a hot winning streak making a choice different from what you were thinking, the sub charts etc etc. So its quite difficult to explain versus supposedly more mechanical approaches. For me, while the bet selection process is more subjective, my approach is to try to make the bet amount decisions more mechanical. For sure, no negative Martingale.
Cheers guys! God bless.

Re-Read this entire thread today and just wanted to bump it up with the quote above.

There are many intangibles in almost all live B&M Bac shoes, period. 

Play any system, play any stop loss, play any stop win, play any flat betting and they will all cost you everything in the long run, or at least in consistent play. 

Also remember, losing huge only happens in continued and continuous play where one flat bets and/or continuously is wagering larger sums of money with a bank roll instead of using a buy in in small proportion to his bank roll, etc.