+ Register

[esoito]

Here's a quote from a baccarat publication:

For some reason, baccarat decisions tend to alternate between streaks dominated by either player or
banker decisions or periods of alternating and choppy decisions.

While this can also be said of roulette and craps as well, these events are more prevalent in baccarat.


Your thoughts -- Yes? No?

[malcop]

From my own experience I find that baccarat is more streaky than Roulette, which is a good thing.

What people have to understand is once the cards have been shuffled because of the card drawing rules the out come if fixed.

So if the Dealer knows the correct drawing rules and dose not make a mistake then the cards will always come out in the same order.
If the same cards were re-played the outcome would be exactly the same because of the drawing rules.



Of course we do not know the order of the cards after being shuffled if you did you would make a killing.

That's why most casinos burn some of the cards before play.

BTW what I mean by burn cards, is taking some of the cards out of play before game starts.
Thanks


malcop

[BacDealer]

Here's a quote from a baccarat publication:

For some reason, baccarat decisions tend to alternate between streaks dominated by either player or
banker decisions or periods of alternating and choppy decisions.

While this can also be said of roulette and craps as well, these events are more prevalent in baccarat.


Your thoughts -- Yes? No?

This is just a comparison. I just posted a "Law of Average" in another thread of what I see in the casino. Yes it is correct because the % is very close between the Choppy tables vs. Streaky tables.

[Mike]

For some reason, baccarat decisions tend to alternate between streaks dominated by either player or
banker decisions or periods of alternating and choppy decisions.

While this can also be said of roulette and craps as well, these events are more prevalent in baccarat.

You need more information to make a comparison. This is vague and ambiguous but I'm assuming that the author is trying to say that there is less of a mixture of streaky and choppy events in baccarat than there is in roulette or craps.
Given that they are all approximately 50:50 games, and that this determines the distribution of outcomes, there is no reason why baccarat should be any different from the other two.

Additionally (although I don't know whether the author is asserting this), if this were the case, then you could clean up by playing the outcomes to continue choppy/streaky, and you wouldn't be damaged by too many streaks occurring when you are betting for chops, or chops occurring when you are betting for streaks.

But as any experienced baccarat player will know, this doesn't work.

[Tomla]

From running tests, talking to dealers that alternate between roulette and baccarat, roulette on the e/c's,  is by far more streaky than bacc even with the two zeros

[Pockets]

Very true