If PB bet P
If BP bet B
example
B
B
B
P
NOW BET B
i cannot take credit
idea given by member name Willie on CC forum, for a roulette bet
Tested against some shoes, It does well
Rich
This will kill it on a jumping shoe. My jumping shoe game is improving, but weak. Somehow easier for players to believe in a long Bank/Player dragon, but not a jumping shoe dragon.
It will get smoked on 2/ 1 combinations though.
Quote from: 21 Aces on April 05, 2016, 11:51:01 PM
This will kill it on a jumping shoe. My jumping shoe game is improving, but weak. Somehow easier for players to believe in a long Bank/Player dragon, but not a jumping shoe dragon.
It will get smoked on 2/ 1 combinations though.
can't argue that. just throwin idea into the mix
not bad but everything has its nemesis. I like it but I also know I see a lot of 1-2 patterns in a shoe........
Recently saw a shoe with 15 hands in a row with a 1-2 PBBPBBPBB etc
Like all other methods, you need a stop loss for a shoe to avoid that nightmare shoe where you lose 12 to 20 units.
...it makes some sense..... after an PB an P must come...so after every change another change must come.... if we have 20 PB ( no matter how much B come after ) at an certian time an P must come......
If the shoe has 80 hands dealed, 20 PB, also 20 BP must come with perhaps 20 BB and 20 PP. ( Just an example ).
Carlitos 8)
Quote from: RouletteGhost on April 05, 2016, 11:28:52 PM
If PB bet P
If BP bet B
example
B
B
B
P
NOW BET B
i cannot take credit
idea given by member name Willie on CC forum, for a roulette bet
Tested against some shoes, It does well
Rich
Was there a movie called unintelligent and Dumber? This whole thread should be re-named unintelligent and dumber.
Quote from: Jimske on April 06, 2016, 03:37:49 PM
Was there a movie called unintelligent and Dumber? This whole thread should be re-named unintelligent and dumber.
This will kill it on a jumping shoe. Fairly obvious and although the progression is quite common, I don't see that many players dominate them like they should. It is easy to see the weaknesses of most every hard rule based approach.