+ Register

[spankmythighs]

I don't know where I saw this but it has always stuck in my mind and is how I play at brick and mortar casinos. When 4 or 6 cards have been dealt, bet the same as winner on next game. When 5 cards have been dealt, bet the opposite of winner on next game. I have been playing this way with alot of success. Using a 1, 3, 7, 15 progression or 2, 6, 14, 20 progression. Good luck!

[WorldBaccaratKing]

im afraid you are the one who will need the luck. might as well flip a quarter, won't be any worse off!

[Tomla]

sounds like a spanking good idea

[Lung Yeh]

Anybody here tried the 6-bet betting system or the 9-bet betting system sold by Silverthorn?

[WorldBaccaratKing]

Anybody here tried the 6-bet betting system or the 9-bet betting system sold by Silverthorn?

link

[Lung Yeh]

What do you mean WBK?

[WorldBaccaratKing]

Do you have a link to what it is your looking for?

[Lung Yeh]

http://www.gamblersbookcase.com/SixBetBetting/dnSxBtBetting5rf8181hvx2.htm

[tdx]

Method uses a negative progression.

If you lose the progression you lose 81 units......If you bet $ 100 a unit, that's $ 8,100.

Only good for playing online where you can bet $ 5 a hand.

Only  a matter of time before the negative progression wipes you out.

[soxfan]

Method uses a negative progression.

If you lose the progression you lose 81 units......If you bet $ 100 a unit, that's $ 8,100.

Only good for playing online where you can bet $ 5 a hand.

Only  a matter of time before the negative progression wipes you out.

Stop the bullshits and nonsenses, no single progression bust should clip you for too much of yer bankroll. For me, a progression bustout costs me 175 unit but that is just under ten percents of my life times roll, hey hey.

[Carlitos]

....... what i do when betting based on the numbers of cards is see which colour has the most in either hand, ( Punto or Banco ).


So if Punto has 3 black cards and Banco has 2 black cards and 1 red but wins then i would play Punto.

So any hand which has the most of 1 colour is were i place the bet.
Sometimes it works very good but i have not tested in full.




Carlitos 

[MiniBac]

I have been working on a system for years based on the number of cards dealt each hand.  it is flat bet and came out positive on 1000 computer generated shoes and 300 real bets at a real casino.  the problem is it is extremely boring system to play as you only make about 5 bets per shoe (and so far I have not come up with another system to play along with it while waiting for trigger bet.)  it is very, very easy to know when to bet, a child could do it.  it is just when one combination (4, 5, or 6 hands) happens to follow another combination, then I flat bet for a certain outcome on the next hand.  must be done many times and appears to make a fraction of a unit per shoe on average (made 15 units after 300 trigger bets at a real casino and 90 units after about 8000 trigger bets from 1000 computer shoes.)  I would like to know how the bet would hold up after another 300 bets but that would take 50 or 60 shoes and hours.  I really can't even play the system any more unless i could sit at the table reading a book and keeping my eye out for the bet.  I always end up getting impatient and start making bad bets which doesn't end well.  I wonder if anyone here that plays a lot would be willing to let me know how my bet holds up while they play.  it doesn't take any tracking or recording.  but I would only want to know which occurred more after the trigger, B or P, to see if the bet still wins more than loses.  and I am not exactly going to explain the system since I spent over a $1000 paying a computer programmer to work with me on the system using the 8 deck data at wizard of odds, and also spent a lot more than that "experimenting" at the casino.