DOUBLE TRIPLETS

Jimske · December 03, 2015, 06:36:35 PM

I posted this a while back and only one person asked for it. I never got any feedback one way or another so I don't know if he bothered or not. But since there are a lot more Peeps around I thought I'd post it again.

Strictly mechanical won 3.86 units a shoe for 175 shoes betting every hand so that's about 12,000 decisions. Maximum bet is 6 units and that doesn't happen often at all.

So if any one wants to check it out PM me and I will send it. It's free.

I don't play it and I am not sure why. I just got into other things and . . . maybe I will.

J

Big EZ · December 03, 2015, 06:42:51 PM

What happened after the 175 shoes that made you lose interest in this one? Do you incorporate this into your current mode of play

BetJack · December 03, 2015, 06:52:22 PM

He may be decided that it is boring....
and he started playing something exciting...

Jimske · December 04, 2015, 12:57:29 AM

Quote from: BetJack on December 03, 2015, 06:52:22 PM
He may be decided that it is boring....
and he started playing something exciting...

Good guess. It is boring! But after looking at the shoe data stats I remembered why. It only achieved a 65% shoe win rate. I figured I could do as well as that or better using my guess trend method.

80% shoe win rate the bare minimum for me. Reason is I don't play a lot of shoes at one sitting so the variance for 65% could be great though I just looked back and saw that I only lost 3 shoes in a row three times and after that 5 shoes IAR once.

Oh. It's in PDF so you got to send me an email address.

shuttle · December 04, 2015, 04:17:59 AM

Thanks for posting.

I would appreciate knowing what was the average loss for the losing shoes?

Jimske · December 04, 2015, 03:01:35 PM

Quote from: shuttle on December 04, 2015, 04:17:59 AM
Thanks for posting.

I would appreciate knowing what was the average loss for the losing shoes?

I don't know the exact average:

Jimske · December 04, 2015, 03:47:27 PM

If you didn't send me your email you didn't get the pdf.

Jimske · December 04, 2015, 05:40:26 PM

aargh! I'm getting a lot of returned to sender stuff so . . . try again if you didn't get it.

Jimske · December 08, 2015, 07:18:12 PM

Quite a few asked and received. I didn't share your emails with each other. If any of you want to compare notes, discuss improvements or whatever send me a PM and I will put those of you who are interested together.