Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Greg Fletcher "Baccarat Attack Strategy" seems working well

Started by bmare, September 23, 2014, 09:27:05 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bmare

Hi everyone.
After studying the Greg Fletcher "Baccarat Attack Strategy" (it's quite simple) i've decided to test it with real money and seems working fine.
I've modified the progression because it was too aggressive.
So instead 6-10-16-26-40-60 i use 6-10-16-26
Seems working fine, i play it with 0.50 coins (i earn around 10€ each session and sometimes i loose around 20-25€ instead 70-75 with Fisher attack).
I've made 22 sessions (software, not live), only 3 were lost so if the trend will not change it means that it's a good strategy!
I've always been skeptical about strategies readable online, but i've decided to trust him and here am I [smiley]aes/beer.png[/smiley]

Google: Baccarat Attack Strategy pdf

Leapyfrog

Quote from: bmare on September 23, 2014, 09:27:05 AM
I've always been skeptical about strategies readable online, but i've decided to trust him and here am I [smiley]aes/beer.png[/smiley]
bmare - you have been very generous. You have decided to enrol today to post this one so that we all can benefit. Everyone should take a leaf from your generosity.
Giant leap is formed of baby steps.

Tomla

i read thru it and tried a couple of bad shoes, my style and it did well.....will test a bit more-- the betting strategy seems solid

bmare

The Fletcher strategy is downloadable for free.
I think that the retrenchment progression can be optimized.
Sincerely i cannot understand why if the attack progression is 2-3-4-5-6-8-... it cannot be the same with the retrenchment.
I have studied a lot of progressions with roulette and i think that Fletcher has found an interesting way to win a lot of sessions, but considering a random software like playtech it's absolutely necessary to adjust the retrenchment.
If you have some ideas about different retrenchment progression we can discuss them.

RichBailey86

i am wayyyyyyy too lazy to read that pdf to find the bet selection and progression lol :pirate:
Danny: Because the house always wins. Play long enough, you never change the stakes. The house takes you. Unless, when that perfect hand comes along, you bet and you bet big, then you take the house.

Rusty: You've been practicing this speech, haven't you?

Danny: Little bit. Did I rush it? Felt I rushed it.

bmare

I am not Fletcher, i'm a simple player that read his strategy for free online and i thought to discuss it in this forum.
Sincerely i cannot understand these suspects.
The simple fact that i want to modify the progressions should be enough to avoid any doubt.
Anyway i hope to see soon good ideas.
I have modified the retrenchment as told and i've put a stop win at 10 coins and a stop loss at 20 coins and i see a better performance.
But i think that it's possible to do better.
[smiley]aes/wink.png[/smiley]

bmare

In the picture you can see the result of the first 20 sessions:
column A = number of bets
column B = bets won
column C = bets lost
column D = income
column E = balance (start at 28,34)
column F = play results (ties don't count in the Fletcher strategy)
column G = max bet
column H = lost coins

I got the bad sessions 5 times, more than the Fletcher expectations.
Of course 20 session are not 100 sessions or more.
Let's see.
One idea is to stop win after 7-10 coins earned instead of 10 and to stop loss at 17 coins lost instead of 20 (statistic shows that i can reduce loss in that way).

esoito

Only 3 losing sessions out of 22 seems pretty good.  :thumbsup:

Be interested to see if that trend holds up.

A wise move to reduce the progression sizes, bmare.

I've noticed before that bet sizes in all the Silverthorne publications that I've read mainly seem to be intended for those with more money than sense!

Tomla

good job bmare,,, i keep on forgetting to test more shoes but I will--tightening the mm is smart also!

wannawin

Good post. Thank you for taking the time.

Quote from: bmare on September 24, 2014, 07:59:13 PMI got the bad sessions 5 times, more than the Fletcher expectations.

Unfortunately experience has shown that the above expectations by system vendors are quite distant from what happens in reality.
When it comes to this type of PDF files take what you read with a grain of salt. Base your conclusions in the reality of your own personal testing. Greetings.
say things directly to show respect for other people's time. Walter.

NathanDetroit

wannawin,

Among the systems listed   by Fletcher  there is only  one  in particular, and that is the  most striking one  of  all of them

  However  Fletcher does not mention all the requirements of a  proper bankroll WG, LL, when to leave the table and finally the casino

Nuff said . I am playing this system for the past 17 years.


Nathan Detroit


Tomla

its funny i tested this on 15 of my shoes and no losses using my own bet selections---is it a grail--lol,,, will check more and I'm testing as the bet is written 7 step retrenchment etc

ozon

With the original Fletcher bet selection I did only 30% of session bankroll and I bust the 7 steps of progression, I  play 4  sessions in Dublinbet ,exactly as it was written in  book.

Dr. Mabuse

Quote from: ozon on October 02, 2014, 09:07:01 PM
With the original Fletcher bet selection I did only 30% of session bankroll and I bust the 7 steps of progression, I  play 4  sessions in Dublinbet ************,exactly as it was written in  book.*******

Keep on doing  exactly as  written in the book you are better off.
Don`t tweak  the method with your own ideas.

This  post  does not constitute an endorsement  on my behalf of Fletchers methods  as  outlined in his book.

Dr. Mabuse
The Gambler

Tomla

not tweaking the fletcher bet but I am using my own bet placements