+ Register

[WorldBaccaratKing]

did any one say this was a holy grail? but it does seem one should at least read the the thing before complaining or even commenting about it

when its "free" on an internet search engine, throw it away and never look back.......i just saved you thousands...

[Tomla]

so you like the pay for strategies more WBK! ok got ya

[Sputnik]

Tomla ifyou want wecan tweak the method and Exchange ideas - i will PM you ...
Don't bother with otthers Tomla, they are just trolling.
The basic concept is very good.

[soxfan]

The method does have merits, but you gotta have the guts to place the progressive bets when you lose the bets.

Yup, in the end the difference between winnings and losings is havin the bankroll and the balls to push out some big bets to back up yer play, hey hey.

[WorldBaccaratKing]

Tomla ifyou want wecan tweak the method and Exchange ideas - i will PM you ...
Don't bother with otthers Tomla, they are just trolling.
The basic concept is very good.

Hey now, aren't you supposed to share?

[WorldBaccaratKing]

if the basic concept is very good, leave it alone. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.......fiddling gets you no where

[XXVV]

You might be amused to hear that I bought a copy of GF's BAS  over 5 years ago and very effectively applied it to Roulette playing sixains ( double streets). I retain a copy of this work material in my 'top drawer' and regard this work very highly. There is a place for controlled progressions.

[AsymBacGuy]

The word "seems" in the thread subject is perfectly appropriate.

Unfortunately any kind of progression, even though this one was acutely thought, soon or later will fail.

Moreover, imo the idea to bet every hand is really debatable because it increases the variance at the maximum value.
Are we really going to "control" the game hand by hand getting the most high variance value?

But the general idea to bet 2 as initial bet then lowering to 1 in case of success isn't insignificant, imho.

as.






 

[super6]

Yup, in the end the difference between winnings and losings is havin the bankroll and the balls to push out some big bets to back up yer play, hey hey.

Absolutely agree. Must have the bankroll and balls to play this system. I practiced online in 2012 on Dublinbet, and now I am practicing again on Celtic casino. I'd also briefly played with real money a few years ago in landbased casino. I remember I'd played 4 games in the  casino and all hit the target profit plateau. I'd stopped playing this method because the casino I played at has a much larger minimum stake than I would desire. The online casinos use 6 decks while lanbased casinos use 8 decks. So I do not know if that would make any significant difference. Can anybody advise?

This system requires no guessing nor analysing, just place the bets like a robot. Since this thread started my interest in this has been renewed and I might re-consider playing this again.

[soxfan]

The online casinos use 6 decks while lanbased casinos use 8 decks. So I do not know if that would make any significant difference. Can anybody advise?

The john-O used to swear that six decks shoes were more "streaky" than eight decks shoes. Also, as I recall the dublin bet offers the baccarats version that only pays half price for a win with a banker's six score and I imagine that might mess up a progression scheme, hey hey.

[Lung Yeh]

I actually paid for the BAC! And have not used it. What is the maximum unit at risk? Based on practical experience?

[Jimske]

The word "seems" in the thread subject is perfectly appropriate.

Unfortunately any kind of progression, even though this one was acutely thought, soon or later will fail.

Moreover, imo the idea to bet every hand is really debatable because it increases the variance at the maximum value.
Are we really going to "control" the game hand by hand getting the most high variance value?

But the general idea to bet 2 as initial bet then lowering to 1 in case of success isn't insignificant, imho.

as.

Maybe I'll finally get around to reading that.  I've had it a long while. 

But asymbac please explain to me how betting every hand increases variance when compared with equal number of hands bet.

[gr8player]

But asymbac please explain to me how betting every hand increases variance when compared with equal number of hands bet.

Far be it for me to speak for asymbac, but I'd love to offer my response to your inquiry:

When one learns to streamline their play into only a couple (three at most) preferred trend plays, one can then effectively control their variances.  Alternatively, betting every decision can offer no such advantage.

Look at it this way, if you will, Jimske:

Most Baccarat "wannabes" (analysts/mathites that, frankly, know nothing of how to actually approach this game) will espouse to simply bet Banker every hand, as the Banker bet is always to slight favorite to win the hand.  To which I say:  Nonsense.  Why?  One word: Variance.  You'd need a Brink's truck bankroll to handle those inevitable swings in those Player-dominated shoes (or portions thereof).  In fact, it's funny, because as much as that "bet Banker always" nonsense is espoused by these supposedly-brilliant minds, I've yet to see a single person at the tables actually play that way.  Why?  L.O.S.E.R....that's why.

So we learn to control our variance.  And how best to do that?  By streamlining our play to the point of, for lack of a better term, MASTERING certain preferred trends.  By doing so, one's strike rates will most certainly improve to, eventually, a positive peak, which, in turn, will make drawdowns/downturns much more controlled; and all of that will lead you into a completely efficient and effective recoup process.

And what happens when recoup is relatively safe and easy?  Well, all of those sessions where we've won, which means no recoup was necessary at all, become PURE PROFIT.  And that profit adds up so very nicely over the long term.

So we limit our plays all in the name of variance control.  And once we successfully control our variances, the money management comes to us naturally, and this game, effectively, HAS BEEN BEATEN.

Stay well.

[Tomla]

the actual bet selection  is pretty darn good-----

[WorldBaccaratKing]

the actual bet selection  is pretty darn good-----

QUIT SPEAKING IN RIDDLES. what bet selection?