### Topic: In The Head Of Sputnik  (Read 781 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

#### Sputnik

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1213
##### In The Head Of Sputnik
« on: October 29, 2017, 06:54:07 PM »

• Here we go again with 1 in 3 odds using three different formations that has the same random distribution as three dozen.
What i want to show with this example is how each formation can strike for several times in a row or all three formations can alternate.
That is one selection process using this concept, another concept is to bet against the strikes.

The selection process has such high quality so i have been testing with with positiv progression and mild progression and winning two in a row concept.
I post the selection formations or sequence patterns before and will copy the material and explain how, when and why to place your bets in certain ways.

Cheers

#### jsintl

• Rising Member
• Posts: 35
##### Re: In The Head Of Sputnik
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2017, 04:22:12 PM »
• Here we go again with 1 in 3 odds using three different formations that has the same random distribution as three dozen.
What i want to show with this example is how each formation can strike for several times in a row or all three formations can alternate.
That is one selection process using this concept, another concept is to bet against the strikes.

The selection process has such high quality so i have been testing with with positiv progression and mild progression and winning two in a row concept.
I post the selection formations or sequence patterns before and will copy the material and explain how, when and why to place your bets in certain ways.

Cheers

Hi Sputnik,

This is interesting.  Hoping to hear more details from you.

Best regards,
jsintl

#### Sputnik

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1213
##### Re: In The Head Of Sputnik
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2017, 06:44:43 PM »

•  I just want to show the strength behind the selection method - this is winning two in a row without progression - flat betting - but there is variance so in the end you need a mild progression

W W

L W L W W

W L L W L W W

W W

L W L W W

L L W L W L W W

W W

W L W W

L L W L W L W W

L L W W

W W

W L W L W W

W W

L W L L L

+2
+2
+2
+2
+1
+2
+1
+0
+2
+2
+0
+2
+2
+2
-3

#### jsintl

• Rising Member
• Posts: 35
##### Re: In The Head Of Sputnik
« Reply #3 on: November 03, 2017, 07:58:19 PM »
• I just want to show the strength behind the selection method - this is winning two in a row without progression - flat betting - but there is variance so in the end you need a mild progression

W W

L W L W W

W L L W L W W

W W

L W L W W

L L W L W L W W

W W

W L W W

L L W L W L W W

L L W W

W W

W L W L W W

W W

L W L L L

+2
+2
+2
+2
+1
+2
+1
+0
+2
+2
+0
+2
+2
+2
-3

Hi Sputnik,

This is really interesting.
More details if it's all possible.

Best regards,
jsintl

#### Blue_Angel

• Hero Member
• Posts: 804
• Gender:
• Sometimes crackpots are winning jackpots!
##### Re: In The Head Of Sputnik
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2017, 02:22:22 AM »
• 2 hits in a row for 18 out of 37 has less chance than a single hit for 12 out of 37.

On first case you have 24.32% probability and on the second 32.43%.

There's 8.11% difference.

Just the facts
When Steven Seagull follows the boat is because thinks that scoops will be thrown in the sea...

#### jsintl

• Rising Member
• Posts: 35
##### Re: In The Head Of Sputnik
« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2017, 07:02:09 PM »
• Hi Sputnik,

Thanks

#### Sputnik

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1213
##### Re: In The Head Of Sputnik
« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2017, 10:14:58 PM »

• Hello i will explain - but at the moment i am deep into sportbetting so maybe next week ...
Is really the best of the best - my opinion.

Cheers