Is it ‘Beatable’? Or, is it ‘Not-Beatable’?
Here is something I found on the board and it does raise some issues, mainly to educate those that are new to the game and those that have played for a while and are just being stubborn and failing to realize why they do not prevail much more than they actually do.
“Claiming that the game is not mathematically beatable, why are they on here?”
Those kind of statements, IMO—come from the members with a commercial purpose of being here of some type. Also, there are a certain breed and mentality of member that feels a need and desire to gang-up with those of a commercial endeavor to help support them and fight the other members in the name of their so-called comrade and against those that tell the truth, share their knowledge and experience as well as discredit fallacies and sheer hype that will only hurt a player financially. Both groups of people are generally offensive in nature and they twist statements and posts in their attempt to discredit other members and give themselves some type of credence or position.
One can compare what I am trying to say to going to one of two classes. The first would be to an instructor that is just taking up space and just trying to fulfill his space until the class is over, each day as well as the entire course. The instructor has a set plan he adopted from ‘somewhere’ and generally knows nothing more other than, what the content he is throwing out that most likely was pre-packaged and pre-planned by others. When any interested students of the course asks questions, they are almost always answered in one of two ways. Either, ‘look it up and do you own research rather than seeking the easy way out’, or ‘That is not part of what the course content is, that is of no relevance’. Then there is the second instructor. He runs a classroom that asks many questions and each and every one of them is met with answers and reasoning’s as well as discussion and content. Subject matter is learned rather than a course content being temporarily absorb to pass a test and the entire course taught almost nothing about the subject to the students that would be truly useful. The instructor clearly defines every ‘how and why’ with his own knowledge and experience.
With that said, I shall continue. Is baccarat beatable or not? It is not, in the sense of learning or discovering or purchasing a system that will show the player how to make bet placement scheduled wagers and continually win. Whether that is advertised at 75% or 87% or 90%, etc. However, there are numerous advantages a player can give himself.
The knowledge and the experience of others that show such things as the proper and guaranteed money management of ‘win money’, positive progressions of wagering for shoe presentments that allow a player to capitalize on opportunities, side parlaying wagers that are built up out of win money and removed from your chip stack, as well as numerous other factual results that have residually shown themselves I have written about. Those things have tremendously allowed me to prevail much more than lose a session. In consistent play—yes. Every shoe—every session—no. But, overall most definitely.
And, the other question that is presented by another on this board attempting to discredit and lend itself to the exposure of ‘something’, is the following: “If someone is smart enough to know that ‘it’ cannot be beaten and loss is inevitable, why the hell is he a member of a board like this”.
Using part of their own lingo and terms, I shall answer that. You can think out of the box all you desire, math and science are not static or flawless. However, math and science will not provide a way to consistently by any means, beat the game—hand after hand or shoe after shoe with any reasonable identifying trends, patterns or any other labeled events allowing the gambler to have a consistent win with scheduled bet placement wagers of any type. For the simple proven fact since the 1950’s that since baccarat came to the USA from Cuba proved. The same bet placement method employed that allows you to win will also be the exact same one that will cause you to lose. Period.
The key to baccarat is not in bet placement once a player understands the basics of the game and what will probably not happen in the terms of patterns, trends or events. It is strictly the frame-of-mind, psych and the player’s ability to realize with 100% consciousness everything that he is doing and coming at him in the game while he is at the table, just before and immediately after.
The problem lies with the authors and the sellers of gambling systems and discovered secret holy-grails along with the naïve, inexperienced and/or desperate players that patronize them. The aftermath that the two types of people just mentioned create, subtract from the real, factual and experienced information posted on here that has proven itself extremely defensive to many players allowing themselves to realize larger win holds and less loss money to the casino.
The hype, the drama and the all things along those lines are created just about each and every time because someone is selling something and a few others have decided joining up with the person claiming to have the holy-grail or another secret form of magical dust for sale—is being discriminated against, treated unfairly and illegal by myself or others that have played this game for a while. Every single time just about, come to think about it.
So why in the hell would someone that does not believe in bet placement scheduled methods employing a secret holy-grail or a recently discovered form of magical dust will not prevail---being on a board like this?
Because, we expand our minds, discuss what we know and share our experiences playing at the casino. We just realize that there is no holy-grail and/or secret magical dust that can be purchased or learned that will 'beat' the casino. And the other mind-frame players, the ones that preach and believe in the holy-grail or magical dust bet placement pre-scheduled wagering systems, are here to sell those and have nothing to really share except the advertising, sale and marketing by any means whatsoever in their attempts to earn money rather than employing their own system at the casino to make millions Perhaps better yet, why not ask the question, "Why would someone having the knowledge and the holy-grail of a system that can beat the casino actually be here wasting their time on the board rather than be earning the ez living and huge cash in a casino everyday, all day"