+ Register

[WorldBaccaratKing]

Seriously?

All I see if blacked out boxes hiding the holy grail. People saying after they see a shoe they can win with this/that/any method.........I mean im typing here in bed laughing to myself, the wife says, what are you laughing at? Oh nothing, same old stuff on an internet forum. People (wannabees) saying they win money but no one produces anything...........

Lets get productive shall we?

Lets talk about using Pit bosses method with the penthouse progression.....

Pros/cons? Anything you would like to add, tweak, etc?

Lets see what we can do....Please, no black boxes covering up data [smiley]aes/joking.png[/smiley]

[Tomla]

I like Pitboss with a Penthouse---which version of penthouse do you use? but on pitboss after the initial 2 bets if it losses I bet for the 4 to to stop  before gong to 5 once with a sep bankroll

[WorldBaccaratKing]

I like Pitboss with a Penthouse---which version of penthouse do you use?

The last one GLC posted over where he posts. 111-222-etc., etc. Cross off last 2, need 35 units for buy in.....

[WorldBaccaratKing]

Tom,

The more I thought about this, using the penthouse with PB method, may be no good!

Reason is you bet against 2's and 3's and go with 4's. Penthouse, we would be betting, 100-100-100, lose all 3 before going to next level. I think we have a good chance of the 2's or 3's breaking in which case using PH, we would be "even". If 4's went to 5's, we would still be out a unit......

So, would need to tweak PH for use on the PB method......

Hows foxwoods been?

[Tomla]

Hey Bac King ,, Im pretty sure Pitboss is vs 3 in a row or 4 in a row. Heres a copy of the system:


A very interesting 'Free Baccarat Strategy' that is 'guaranteed to win'. Narrated by a player calling himself the 'pitboss' and played online, this system aims to take advantage of the relatively low percentage of 3 in a rows with modest but higher bet values.

Since you are playing online, you need to set up your strategy by betting the minimum bet on both the player and the banker hands at the same time. In real casinos and live games, this is not necessary.

– What you need to wait for is a repeat win of either 2 wins in a row for the banker or 2 wins in a row for the player.

– After 2 wins on either hand has occurred, you just switch to the opposite hand and bet one unit.

– If you get a tie on the next hand, you just ignore it and rebet the same amount on the same hand.

– If you lose the bet, you bet 2 units on the next hand

- If you lose that 2 unit bet, you will switch to the other hand and bet one unit to take advantage of any perceived streak. This presumably negates the main disadvantage of the Martingale progression betting system where you are constantly 'chasing your losses' until you hit the upper betting limit or run out of money. At this point the same hand has won 4 times in a row (2 in the beginning before you started this system and 2 while playing this system).

- If you win, you will repeat the bets until the 'run' is over.
– When you lose,

[WorldBaccaratKing]

Tom,

When you see 2 in a row, you are betting it won't go to three. If you lose you NOW have 3 in a row and bet again that it won't go to 4. If you lose that you have 4 in a row and NOW you bet that the 4 goes to 5.

That is what I originally wrote!

I just don't think PH will go with this bet selection.....

[WorldBaccaratKing]

After 2 wins on either hand has occurred, you just switch to the opposite hand and bet one unit. Hence, betting against 2 going to 3, you want it to chop...

– If you lose the bet, you bet 2 units on the next hand You lost prior bet and now have "3" in a row, PB is telling us to bet 2 units here that it won't go to "4" in a row (another bet against the streak hoping it will chop here

If we lose above bet, we're out 3 units and NOW we bet for it to STREAK (the 4 in a row will now become 5 in a row. If we win, continue betting 2 unit until the streak ends and resume waiting for a 2 in a row. If we lose this bet, that means it hit 4 and the mini streak ended. We are now out 4 units and I think he said use a stop loss of 8 units/shoe. If we lose to consecutive 4's, which I have seen A LOT (im sure we all have seen it) wait for a new shoe.......

[WorldBaccaratKing]

using the ph progression would take some tweaking. Not even sure PB method is even that viable anymore.....

im talking to myself, no one seems to have anything that works or they are thinking about........

[vo rogue]

pitboss in the penthouse
user in the outhouse
seller in the whorehouse
scammer in the jailhouse
martingaler in the madhouse
liars in the whitehouse

[ezmark]

I've often thought that the Pitboss method and System 40  method were similar methods.

[Tomla]

guess there is not much bacc info floating around these days

[WorldBaccaratKing]

nope. i get their isn't a HG, I do, but at least people can share what they think and we can explore it...tonight I seen 13 banks in a row...not much to do with that except ride it out....

[gr8player]

OK, I'll raise my hand.

I play Baccarat with real money.

Yes, it's true....there isn't much happening in the way of any real discourse regarding this game, WorldBaccaratKing, so I certainly empathize with your obvious frustration.

I don't know, but I think that, as a member of various Bac forums for the last 6 -7 years, that the discourse simply become repetitive and, frankly, predictable.  I truly believe that some seasoned members know pretty much what they're going to read as soon as they see a thread and/or post from "gr8player".  I've been espousing the same philosophies/methodologies regarding this game for years now. 

And I'm not the only one in that boat.  There's just so much rehashing of the "same old, same old" that anyone could care to accept.

By now, anyone that cares to know anything "gr8player" has found out all they need to know.   My play has become as steady and as consistent as I could ever have wished for.  I track a few separate and distinct trend plays...plays in which I am very familiar with all the pertinent "stats" on...and bet either for or against their occurrences dependent upon those very stats.  All wrapped in a custom-built MM plan for each of those trends.  Plain and simple, and in a nutshell, right there is all one really needs to know of me and my approach to this game.

Take care and stay well.

[Rolex-Watch]

OK, I'll raise my hand.

I play Baccarat with real money.  as opposed to monopoly money like the rest of us?

Yes, it's true....there isn't much happening in the way of any real discourse regarding this game, WorldBaccaratKing, so I certainly empathize with your obvious frustration.

I don't know, but I think that, as a member of various Bac forums for the last 6 -7 years, that the discourse simply become repetitive and, frankly, predictable.  I truly believe that some seasoned members know pretty much what they're going to read as soon as they see a thread and/or post from "gr8player".  I've been espousing the same philosophies/methodologies regarding this game for years now. 

And I'm not the only one in that boat.  There's just so much rehashing of the "same old, same old" that anyone could care to accept.

By now, anyone that cares to know anything "gr8player" has found out all they need to know.   My play has become as steady and as consistent as I could ever have wished for.  I track a few separate and distinct trend plays...plays in which I am very familiar with all the pertinent "stats" on...and bet either for or against their occurrences dependent upon those very stats.  All wrapped in a custom-built MM plan for each of those trends.  Plain and simple, and in a nutshell, right there is all one really needs to know of me and my approach to this game.

Take care and stay well.

Yes folks, this is all we need to know, right there.... 

Kind of worrying when one starts talking about themselves in the third person though!!!!!!

[ADulay]

Rolex,

   You must really be bored now.  Trolling 8 month old messages to play the foil.

   I'm impressed.

   AD