+ Register

[alrelax]

Sitting there, trying to change and overrule the shoe; versus—seeing it and transposing yourself into the shoe and the flow of it, IE: what is really happening and being presented with the 'wave' as I call it. 


B—P—B—P—B—P—B—P—B—P—B—P—B—P—B—P—B—P
B—P                  P        P---T   P                                 B—P
B                       P                  P                                 B—P
T                                                                              B---T
                                                                                B
                                                                                B
                                                                                B—B—B—B—B

The #'s, both sides were producing prior to the 11 Bankers in a row, was either one side reducing to zero or nearly zero and the other side, adding to a 7-8-9.  Or naturals were present for several repeating hands, etc.  Almost every time I see that chain of events, something strong will happen.  Whether that be a longer repeating run or a 15 hand alternating chop, a long series of doubles or even 1-2-3's—3's-2-1's, etc., etc. 

Any kind of pattern/trend/bias can make you a lot of money real quick.  Wager one, parlay it and then pull down 7-12 hands and lose the last one of whatever it is you found or followed.

I have found this a hundred times more successful than anything of the likes, follow the last one or follow the one previous to last because it will protect me for 2 out of the only 3 things to happen, etc.  When you do that, you will always give back or lose just about an equal amount. 

2 or 3 times, identifying something to wager on, in a couple of shoes is a real nice profit and addition to win money to divide up into a 1/3rd, 1/3rd, 1/3rd Money Management System.  Put away your buy-in and lock up some and play with the rest. 

Again, there are signs of events that might happen.  When numerous signs are there, it is time to get away from the win one, lose one, or playing for the 'cut' as so many do, IMO.  In this particular case, the #'s were present, the player had 14 at the start of the banker run and the banker had 10.  When the banker made the 3rd bank, it was then B=13 and P=14.  Each of the 3 bankers were either naturals or 3rd card 7's-8's or 9's over low totaling player's side presentments.  I saw the wave possibly coming, I did feel it and I wagered $300.00, parlayed to $600.00 and pumped that up to $900.00 for the 3rd one and left it at the $900.00.  Put the $300.00 back in my chip stack and if it fell off at or after the third, I took the risk and still had my risk capital returned prior to the 4th hand coming out.  That is my way of thinking.  Risk, but very low risk and my possible gain would be there each time it possibly would sustain itself.

Many times, the majority that I do witness, there is some kind of equaling out that takes place.  Seldom does a shoe finish with excess of 10, at times it could be up around 20, but that is rare, IMO.  More than likely--or let's say very frequently, shoes equal out.  No, that is not a sole and dominating factor to wager by any means.  But coupled with numerous other factors, I find it more often than not, equaling out and going positive for a bit rather than staying deficient.  Especially, after 1/3rd of the shoe and before the last 1/3rd of the shoe. 

It does not have to be a streak or repeating side.  Like I said, it can be any one of numerous other types of events.  Your vision and your neutrality will allow you to be in the position to recognize what might be waiting for presentment. 

[alrelax]

BTW,  i write about real hard core reality and gambling, not virtual testing and such.