+ Register

[alrelax]

Well my close friend did a $55k win in a small section of a shoe yesterday in Vegas. 

He did follow my drill instruction into him for quite some time prior to this. Which were 4 things I write about and write about and write about.

1). Low Ties 0-1-2-3.  Normally produces a repetitive presentation of P-B forthcoming hands.  Does not matter whether chop, doubles, 1s and 2s, streaks, naturals cut, etc. 

2). Equalization.  And this section of the shoe had it to the max!  Perfect guidance. 

3). One More.  Many do not understand this concept, but just ONE MORE was classic here on both the players and the bankers iar wins. 

4). Parlay and Pull Down.  Pull down wins and lose the last one, not matter if streaking or chop or doubles.  Don't stop and start again, it takes away focus and profits. 

Explanation of his play:

Background.  He brings $12k total cash,  planning a $10k buy-in and play allocation and $2k cash if needed for personal expenses in the event no win or comps.

He was going to place as a base, $750-$1,500 opening risk wagers from his buy-in. 

His first shoe shown below.  Begins.  Three chops and then three players in a row, table wagered Banker heavy after the three in a row players.

He jumped in on the 11th hand for a chop but it was a double player. He lost. He stuck with Banker most others went back to players as everybody was citing, "player strong", etc.

$1,500 on Bankers, $3,000 on Bankers full parlay, $6,000 on Bankers full parlay.  Then he looked at it as a 1 & 2 win, so having only $1,500 invested in the Bankers now on his parlays, he would pull down any $6,000 win money recovering his $1,500 risked and promised himself he would pull down for each upcoming win if it continued.  Well it did for 6 more Bankers iar after the first 3.

6 Xs times pulled down $6k with focus and concentration, and losing the last one on hand 10.

He wagered for a chop but lost it on hand 23. $5k wager.

Wagered for a Banker and won on hand 24. $10k wager, recovering his previous lost $5k.  Self admitting to himself he is nervous about a continued win. Which we normally do not do continued flat betting, but after a decent sized win and quickly sizable win to the risked money, he decided to. 

Wagered for a Banker and won on hand 25.  $5k wager.
Wagered for a Players and won on hand 26. $5k wager.
Wagered for a Players and won on hand 27. $5k wager.
Wagered for a Bankers and won on hand 28. $2.5k wager.
Wagered for a Bankers and won on hand 29. $2.5k wager.

Wagered Players on hand 30 for his falling off money he lost on the 10th Bankers and his 1st wager, won them both back.  (LOL he is a bit stubborn and egotistic) He stopped and won $25k on the doubles. Won $36k on the Bankers run.

He attempted 3 other wagers on another shoe with $2k wagers and lost them all.  He called it a session and left.

And in my blog, I said the following a couple of weeks ago in reference to the reality of table game play:  "And those that say to watch and watch and wager only a wager or two or three with some kind of small stop loss amount.  My response?  Well here it is. Uneventful failure is not a success. Because you do not lose you cannot justify not winning with success, it is a catastrophic failure of play."   
 

[alrelax]

Another advantage helper comes into play here big time IMO.

Sections.  If you can stay conscious 'outside of your playing' and be able to think, Sections definitely comes into play here.

So far at this point, there are 2.  Section 1 would end as soon as the 9 iar Bankers end, because of the numbers of hands played so far and the Bankers falling off. 

Remember, 3-5 Sections per shoe.  15-25 hands per Section.  Sections end and begin with a break in whatever trend/pattern appearing.