+ Register

[AsymBacGuy]

AS i Think this is a brilliant method - it is in the same line of thinking i have.
You can see the SD when you divide the events into seven with overrepresented events and underrepresented events.

Look at this 12 events contra 1 event and 12 events contra 1 event and 12 events - that is 5.51 SD - thas has not happen after several millions of simulations.

If some one can divide any events and cover it with the staking plan with a benchmark of 5.04 SD - then you have a pretty good chanse not losing at all.

Cheers

+

Yeah, I appreciate a lot your comment as I know you are a true expert of SD.

Indeed we don't necessarily have to play any single 7 pattern, a careful registration might help us as you pointed out.
Moreover, we could benefit even more knowing that some 7 patterns are slight more likely than others itlr, as the game is 50.68 vs 49.32. Slightly of course, and very diluted. But they are and they might add to the overall probability to not encounter very negative sequences.

Cheers

as.       

[roversi13]

This system(GROUP OF 7 is its name) is a kind of diluted martingale.
At the end the result will be the same of a traditional martingale.........lol



But you can postpone your ruin with some modifications:
-play it "en differentiel"
-determine what is your max bet(for instance 50 units) and when you reach a negative balance of 150 units,you try to recover it in three attacks,using of course GROUP OF 7

This system doesn't work at Baccarat,as all  negative progression systems .
5% reduction when you win on B,disturbs your money management.
Personnally I play with a progression max 5 units (very rare,usually 1-3 units max) and I play in average 2-5 bets per shoe.
Play all the shoe,every hand it's a suicide

[goez]

To me this is as dangerous as the Target betting.

[Sputnik]

- after  7 hands = 72.66%

- after 14 hands = 93.52%

- after 21 hands = 98.23%

- after 28 hands = 99.52%

- after 35 hands = 99.87%

I check and 35 contra 4 events is 4.96 SD - Amazing.
Can some one show me the progression - i am not sure i understand it correct.
This is for even Money bets with La Partage Rule with 1.35% edge or losing half the Wager is zero hit.

Is this correct staking plan? or am i doing something wrong.
If not can some one show me the correct staking plan with explination.

L 1
L 1
L 1
L 1
L 1
L 1
L 1

L 8
L 8
L 8
L 8
L 8
L 8
L 8

L 16
L 16
L 16
L 16
L 16
L 16
L 16

L 32
L 32
L 32
L 32
L 32
L 32
L 32

L 64
L 64
L 64
L 64
L 64
L 64
L 64

[roversi13]

After 7 L,next bet 8 units
After additional 7 L,next bet 57 units(8 x 7 + 1)
After other 7 L,next bet 400 units(57 x 7 + 1)

A disaster.....

[Sputnik]

There is no exisint table limits for that!

Cheers