People always bring up, "To win on a regular basis", all you have to do is such and such or follow, so and so. Whether that is the VinSap count or anything like that perpetrated on another 'elite website' with 'professional multi million dollar consistent baccarat winners', etc., etc., or wagering banker only player only and so on. What is 'regular'? What is a 'session'? What is a 'win'? I would say almost every player's fate of success lies in one thing. Which is, what almost no one will even take into consideration, the 'reset and refresh' protocol and belief by the gambler?
Almost every one I every tried to talk with regarding those will come back with a snotty attitude citing, their own 'loss stop', etc. And in reality all that does if they actually do follow such a thing, is to pile up the losses that their smaller win ratio will be lucky if they can get even or stay even. Best case scenario in reality, is they push their funds and stay even or close to even. Their frame-of-minds will not allow them to wager anything outside of their safe zone that might incur a larger risk. Their safe zone will not be enough to allow them to absorb their losses and do well off of wins. No matter what unit size they are playing with. Does not matter.
Then those people all cited point to Don Johnson or Phil Ivy, etc. Those famous/infamous gamblers are not using a system. They were on a classic heater and that is it. Period. Otherwise they would do it every single time they gamble. They lose also, but those times are not publicized, LOL.
It is the application what actually counts. Not so much the experience and knoweldge, although it can help you or haunt you-depending on the way you apply your experience and knowledge. The application of each wager will determine if a wager is won or lost. Not the experience or knowledge. Can you win with experiences and knowledge more than you can without? Some will argue until their death beds, that you can not apply without proper experience and knowledge and others will argue that experience and knoweldge will have no bearing in application. There are different perspectives of how to apply your buy-ins from your bank roll at the table. That is where the confusion, the arguments, the frustration and the wrong applications are applied by each person, IMO.
Same with NFL Football. Look at the Minnesota Vikings and how they played all year. Almost perfect. Could not be beat and then in the next to last game, they did the impossible comeback and series of historical plays. Then in the next game to propel them to the Superbowl, they lost big and lost like an elementary girls volleyball team playing an NFL pro team. It came down to one game and they sucked, they lost and lost like an amateur team would play without experience, but they have experience and talent. Every excuse in the book was mentioned, but fact is, they lost and lost it all in a game of 60 minutes of play. No different in gambling at baccarat.
It is the same in all investments and businesses, no different.