+ Register

[alrelax]

                              Statistical and Testing Results

Illusory & Faulty Vs. Eternal & Definitive  (Meaning, 'wishful and hopefu' versus 'winning and losing' in reality.)

Run all your computer tests and compile all kinds of statistical data.  Will not mean jack poo-poo at the baccarat table, simply because the shoe you are about to play was exempt from your statistics.  And if by some slight trivial chance, there was a shoe exactly like it in your block of shoes you ran for the statistics you are about to wager by----you messed up. Why?  Because you merged that one shoe with countless other ones and therefore you will be applying the altered results not 100% representative of the shoe you are about to play that was also played within your own test batch.  Unless your test batch was the one shoe only and now at the casino you are sitting down to an exact repeat of that one shoe, hand for hand.

Enormous amounts of 'false fuel' knowledge ideas are inflicted upon the average baccarat player because of the statistical and testing methods that are published.  And in reality, if something made 90% success rate of a 'One Million Shoe Test', what does that really mean?  That means in reality, the event that scored almost being the new holy-grail made 900,000 successful hits out of 1,000,000 attempts.  WOW!  So the common baccarat player will now run out, get up his new buy-in money and run down the casino.  He tries and tries and losses and losses using his new dynamite information that he misunderstood from the internet.  Why?  Maybe the shoes that he happens to be playing are all falling in the 100,000 that were lost in the original tests.  Maybe the stats are really coming from the true average of all those shoes and really has nothing to do with the 'day-to-day' baccarat shoes played in 2's, 4's and 6 shoe groups by the player at his local casino—simply because each shoe he is playing is not an exact mirror of the shoes and the shoe averages from that 90% successful "XYZ" wager, etc.

Run all the tests and read your stats for how many of the following:

"---'XYZ' Wagers--- [after]---'Such and Such' events happened---"

As many times and for as many 'events' as you want to classify.

Does not matter what you have in baccarat.  Those events will make the player lose if he wagers on them with any kind of consistency whatsoever.  Sorry, those tests that you might be banking on are not and will never be 'Eternal and Definitive' to apply to the instant shoe you are preparing to wager on.

And I know on a bet-placement, bet-selection board where there are so many statistical geniuses, scholars, mathematicians, etc., my post will be picked apart and made fun of.  But in reality, I am dead-on correct and the player that swore up and down, he just found the new holy-grail on the internet or within some system because of the 90% statistical wins, he thought, "I have to win at least 9 out of 10 of those wagers that I put down".  And in reality he was lucky if he won one more than he lost.  Because the statistical results on the computer in a test of 'XYZ' number of baccarat shoes, has absolutely nothing to do with the 3 or 5 or 7 shoes you will sit down to gamble on.

What is the reason he did not win the 9 out of 10?  Simple.  He did not play 1,000,000 shoes straight up.  That is the layman's reasons why all the statistical data and results mean poo-poo when you are at the baccarat table playing in reality.