+ Register

[BEAT-THE-WHEEL]

Very long and tedious,  to seek STABLE BET.

which we could win, with mild progression.


============================
T=SERIES OF 3, MORE.
S=SINGLE.
D=SERIES OF 2.

W=WIN.
X=LOSE.
===============

...



BBBB=T
P=S
BBB=T
PPPPPPP=T
BB=D
P=S=X=lose
BBB=T
PP=D
BBBB=T=WIN.
P=S=X
B=S
PPP=T
BBBB=T
PP=D
BB=D=WIN.
P=S
BB=D
PPPPP=T
BBB=T=WIN
P=S
B=S
PPP=T
BBB=T
P=S
BB=D
PPPP=T
B=S=X
P=S
BBB=T   
PPP=T
B=S
P=S
B=S
PP=D
B=S
P=S
B=S
P=S
B=S
P=S
BBB=T
P=S
BBBB=T
PPP=T
B=S
P=S
BBB=T
PP=D
B=S=X
PP=D
BB=D
P=S
B=S
P=S
BB=D
PP=D
BB=D
P=S
BB=D
PP=D
B=S
P=S
BB=D
PP=D
B=S
P=S
BB=D
P=S
BB=D
PP=D
BBBB=T
P=S=X
B             


BB=D
P=S
B=S
P=S
BBBB=T
PP=D
BB=D=WIN
P=S
B=S
PP=D
B=S
P=S
BB=D
P=S
B=S
PPPPPPPP=T
BBB=T
P=S
B=S
P=S
BB=D
P=S
B=S
P=S
B=S
P=S
BB=D
PPP=T
BBB=T=WIN
PPPPP=T
BB=D
PPPP=T=WIN
BBB=T=WIN
P=S
BB=D
P=S     
;                                               
PPPP=T
BB=D
PPPPP=T=WIN
BBBBBBB=T=WIN
PP=D
B=S=X
PP=D
B=S
PP=D
BBBB=T
P=S=X
B=S
P=S
B=S
P=S
BBB=T
PP=D
BBBBBBBBBB=T=WIN
P=S=X
BBBB=T
P=S
BB=D
PPPPP=T
BBB=T=WIN
P   ;
                                               
PP=D
B=S
P=S
B=S
P=S
BBBBB=T
P=S
BB=D
P=S
BBB=T
P=S
B=S
PPP=T
BBBBB=T
PP=D
B=S=X
P=S
BBB=T
PP=D
BBBBB=T=WIN
P=S=X
BB=D
PP=D
BBBBBBB=T
PP=D=WIN
BBBBB=T=WIN
P=S=X
B=S
PPP=T
BBBB=T
;
                                             
P=S
B=S
PP=D
BBB=T
PPPPP=T=WIN
B=S
P=S
B=S
P=S
BBBBBBBB=T
PP=D
BB=D=WIN
P=S
BBB=T
PPP=T
BB=D
P=S=X
B=S
P=S
B=S
P=S
B=S
P=S
BBB=T
P=S
B=S
PPPP=T
B=S
PPPPP=T
BBBB=T
P=S
BB=D
P=S
B=S
PP=D
B =s
`````````````````````           
B=S
P=S
BB=D
PP=D
BB=D
PPPP=T
B=S =X
P=S
B=S
P=S
B=S
PPPP=T
BBB=T
P=S
B=S
PPPPPP=T
BBB=T
P=S
B=S
P=S
BB=D
P=S
BBBB=T
PP=D
B=S=X
P=S
B=S
PP=D
B=S
PP=D
B=S
P=S
B=S
PP=D
BB=D
P=S
B=S
PP=D
                      ```````````````````````                                             
B=S
PPPPPPPPPPPP=T
B=S
P=S
BBBB=T
P=S
BBBB=T
P=S
B=S
PPPPPP=T
BBB=T
PP=D
BB=D=WIN
P=S
B=S
P=S
B=S
PP=D
BB=D
P=S
BB=D
PP=D
B=S
PPPP=T
BB=D
P=S=X
B=S
P=S
B                         ``````````````````````                                             
P=S
B=S
PP=D
BBB=T
PPP=T=WIN
B=S
PP=D
BBBB=T
PPPP=T=WIN
BB=D
P=S=X
BBB=T
P=S
B=S
P=S
BB=D
PP=D
B=S
PP=D
BB=D
P=S
BBB=T
P=S
B=S
PP=D
B=S
PP=D
B=S
PPP=T
B=S
P=S
BBBBBBB=T
P=S
B=S
P=S
BBB=T
P=S
B=S
PP=D   

[Gambler]

BTW - What method you used to play the above shoes?

Doesn't look like the one you showed before?

Looks like you are only betting for 2 after 2/3 or 3/2?

Why did you come up with this BS and left out the earlier one to capture singles/chops? Didn't work?

[BEAT-THE-WHEEL]

 
Hi gentlemen,
The purpose is not to win flatbet,
but to seek a STABLE win/loss,
which could be win, with mild progression.
and see if u understand.

Go to roulette.cc
and read about PA:preaching about HG.

www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15870.msg137414#new

[plolp]

550 spin test (wiesbaden )  = +26,5

[AsymBacGuy]

Hi gentlemen,
The purpose is not to win flatbet,
but to seek a STABLE win/loss,
which could be win, with mild progression.
and see if u understand.

This is a very good comment, imo.

Although being obsessed to look for a flat betting winning method, the previous step I had to study was right this: to seek stable W/L portions of the shoe.

If we have a machine producing 40% of W and 60% of L, yet we could win.
Not mathematically, of course.
That's why I focused my attention about the distribution of such WL patterns itlr.

In some way we might think this 40/60 W/L very unprofitable game producing a given series of patterns.

For example, the simple LLLWW 5-step pattern will produce several different outcomes depending on how and when we have bet (and if we have chosen to bet).

We know that such LLLWW sequence will be less likely than LLLLL or LLLWL or LLLLW, nonetheless it will come out according to its probability.

Now we should assess when and at which degree the above pattern deviated "too much" from the expected value in a way or another, as the 40% probability cannot disappear from the possibilities.

In a finite, asymmetrical and card dependent process game we know that certain standard deviation values cannot last for long, being the prerequisite to a RTM effect not appearing at other 50/50 games.

as. 

 










   

[Sputnik]

I made a tweak to my march and it looks good.
I change between flat betting and smooth progression.

Testing 600 trails and got 8 loses in a row and the highest bet was 3 units.
111122233344455566

[TheLaw]

Hey Sputnik,

So is this a test to see how long you can recover into a positive bank?

Thanks.........very interesting idea!!!

[jsintl]

I made a tweak to my march and it looks good.
I change between flat betting and smooth progression.

Testing 600 trails and got 8 loses in a row and the highest bet was 3 units.
111122233344455566

HI Sputnik,

Will you be able to provide play by play of your tweaked march strategy.\

Thanks.

[Sputnik]

During some periods of the game you win more bets then you lose as you get very high strike ratio with my march, so i only flat betting with this example and the higest bet was 1 unit.
Did not know this as i only run random RNG with roulette extreme.

My Point is that no other march produce the same results where you can relax and don't worry when gambling.
Yes you can get a sequense from hell but you will not lose your pants as you wagering very smooth progression, so there is time to fight or quit.

Also duing the games i play i many times jump from positive to breakeven and postive again without touching negative territorium.
That could also be a reason to quit, when you get nothing with up and down and stop with +3 units and not be greedy.






https://youtu.be/0WqCAP-gKpI

[Sputnik]

I get members from this forum who try to tell me what i alredy know and i will not accept it, so i will continue to delete does messages.

Cheers

[soxfan]

You gotta use a progression, positive or negative to win regular over time, hey hey.

[nobody1]

hey soxfan, do you still throw the dices?  i was reading an old forum a bit ago and i think it was you and another fellow winning with a 'carsch' progression?   ringing a bell?  just wondering-- thanks

[soxfan]

hey soxfan, do you still throw the dices?  i was reading an old forum a bit ago and i think it was you and another fellow winning with a 'carsch' progression?   ringing a bell?  just wondering-- thanks

I made good cake bucking up against the dice grinding the don'ts for a few moth using an extended carsch style. But the baccarats is my fulltime gig now, hey hey.

[TheLaw]

Hey Sputnik,

Do you still play this method, and what was the largest draw-down that you have seen?



Thanks! 

[greenguy]

...delete does messages.

It's those messages, not does messages.