+ Register

[fmajluf1]

Hi there!

I have learned that no strategy at the end of the day is the best in this game..

have been testing this crazy idea with this method i use,
2 different online casino's account's playing with same live video feed, BOOM.. lets make some cash!

i know a couple of online casinos that use the same Live video feed for example, one called "Vivo Interactive" company
used by casino's betonline.ag and also used by mybookie.ag , exact same video feed but totally different sites..

so you can play as a team "yourself" with 2 different accounts or with a buddy if you don't have enough bankroll...
(250$-300$ bankroll per account is enough with this strategy to be safe)

1 account betting on Player and the other account betting on banker...

The goal is to make +6 units per shoe with one of the accounts and play about 8-10 shoes per day with all the breaks you want to have your brain relaxed... and do the math
(since its online no need to rush and make millions in the first shoe.. no pitboss around either hehe..)

Since even if you go sometimes with tendency.. that doesn't make you a winner or even you have an awesome strategy either make you a winner.. 

My goal here again is to with 1 account hit +6 unit, and the other account don't LOSE ANY units..

lets say your betonline.ag is Player side and mybookie.ag is your banker side.

the first account to hit +6 units end the game, while the other account the idea is if you are -8 units to go up to 0,(very doable)
and when that happen you leave the shoe as a winner and the team makes money...

With those sites you can get paid out once per week via Moneygram or bitcoin and other options..
(375$ max cashout via moneygram a week, and 1k with bitcoin once a week) not bad huh?
but we have 2 accounts

Been doing this in practice mode and im ready to go online and do it

what's your thoughts on this?

This can be applied in land based casino as well of course..

[andrebac]

First, your strategy will lose bac commission and anyway is exposed to shoe variance.
Second, you don't need two accounts to do that.
Draw on paper two players outcome.
player a) bet only P virtual
player b) bet only B virtual
when one of the two players reach the gain you need (+6 unit you stated before), the other player comes into real play trying to recover virtual losses from before and giving you real money, if and  when the recover will come.

[fmajluf1]

No problem..
There is a variation in those casino's of the game called "Super 6" only when banker wins with B6 they take commission.

And when the recouping side is alone, i did not explained that strategy here... you can use your own to recoup the losing units.. i have my own  strategies. you need to have a winning strategy and a recouping strategy in your gameplay..

First, your strategy will lose bac commission and anyway is exposed to shoe variance.
Second, you don't need two accounts to do that.
Draw on paper two players outcome.
player a) bet only P virtual
player b) bet only B virtual
when one of the two players reach the gain you need (+6 unit you stated before), the other player comes into real play trying to recover virtual losses from before and giving you real money, if and  when the recover will come.

[Garfield]

How come I never thought of this before ?

[ADulay]

have been testing this crazy idea with this method i use,
2 different online casino's account's playing with same live video feed, BOOM.. lets make some cash!

1 account betting on Player and the other account betting on banker...

what's your thoughts on this?

This can be applied in land based casino as well of course..

Uh, why not just "net bet" on one account and save yourself a lot of aggravation?

AD

[alrelax]

I known a couple of good bac players that tired something similar with 2 accounts, 2 lap tops, etc.  Both back fired after a short time.  I knew these people for a number of years. 

I cannot totally comprehend 100% what the OP is saying and I am not basing an opinion on his plan.  I like Fortune 7, no commission on banker play at all, etc.  I do not like Super 6, lose part of the banker bets and all that.  Whatever.

[fmajluf1]

What i learned practicing this method is that one side will always hit 6 units way faster than the other first.. while the other side not.
If you play alone you can be the other side that take more time to hit 6 units. struggling to make 6 units or whatever units your goal is.

you can hit 6 units say in 6m(imaginary number haven't take note of timing) 
while with the other could take you maybe 11minutes just to get back to 0 units and that could be you "just net betting".

Uh, why not just "net bet" on one account and save yourself a lot of aggravation?

AD

[fmajluf1]

thanks for the quote man.. so i can say i am good bac player haha
you can use this method on red and black, or any 50/50 game too.. not only Baccarat.
red and black takes more time tho...

would not mind to lose a few cents on commissions to make a few thousands weekly tho with this method

but imagine playing like this with a team of 6 people in a real casino...(3 on player and 3 o banker)
3 hitting 6 units each while the others 3 goals is to not lose any units.

I known a couple of good bac players that tired something similar with 2 accounts, 2 lap tops, etc.  Both back fired after a short time.  I knew these people for a number of years. 

I cannot totally comprehend 100% what the OP is saying and I am not basing an opinion on his plan.  I like Fortune 7, no commission on banker play at all, etc.  I do not like Super 6, lose part of the banker bets and all that.  Whatever.

[fmajluf1]

Maybe because not playing enough baccarat ?

How come I never thought of this before ?

[Garfield]

No idea is too crazy here. If you are winning then it is good for you. But more cautious never hurt. But IMO like Adulay said, it's the same as net betting one side only.

[Garfield]

Maybe because not playing enough baccarat ?

Yes. Definitely.

[fmajluf1]

I understand

No idea is too crazy here. If you are winning then it is good for you. But more cautious never hurt. But IMO like Adulay said, it's the same as net betting one side only.