+ Register

[alrelax]

Took my time to copy, explain and post.

Please, if you don't like it, enjoy it, need it, use it to learn, use it t confirm or deny what you think you know or found as holy-grails, etc., etc., page on.  Do not come on here and chastise, humiliate and degrade.  Thank you!

I will not tolerate chastising or belittling, or will the other Mods.  This is a real shoe from a B&M casino.  This is reality, not theory or speculation. 

Middle's?  Identifiable events?  Seeing somthing?  Sectioning and Turning Points, IMO.  Numerology, Etc.

Counts +10 to -10.  Equaling out.  Catching up. 

P'8's and F-7's & 'Cuts'

Low Ties.

I will post other notes, explaining what I was writing that is extremely hard to read, as that is what was happening on the white card.  The white card is the actual casino card-just enlarged.  The yellow paper is what I copied the original onto, in the attempt to be a bit neater for you interested members.

[attach=1]

[attach=2]

The pink highlights are the P-8's and the F-7's:

[attach=3]

The green highlights are the ID of the 'sections':

[attach=4]

"Turning Point"  This one highlighted in the orange, is a 'major' one.  Some shoes have several and some might not have a major one at all.  But here is a classical example of a major one and it came right at half way.  I have wrote about shoes changing when they are distinctive and producing something recognizable for some time.  The first half prior to the major turning point was a bit strong, 'A' section more so than 'B' section.  But it did change after the banker mini-run there.  It got weak and much more sporadic than the section prior to it. 

To me, there is quite often a turning point, a major one at hands 30-32 --  50/55. 

The sections here, 'A'--'B'--'C'--'D' have turning points as well of a certain type.  I marked them as to how I view the shoe. 

The last 15 hands to me are generally sporadic, weak and extremely hard to catch.  Or, infrequently, a strong ending, especially if the shoe had, say 2 sections or maybe 3, including the end.  More favorable in making the strong side if the shoe presents a catch-up situation to equal out or attempt in equaling out the +10 to -10 deficits, at the very end, etc. 

This particular shoe with the P-8's and the F-7's.  I frequently see 3 or 5 P-8's within a shoe.  As far as F-7's, I have said many times, if it makes 1 it might make 2.  However, If it made 3 it will, the highest majority of the times (at least when I play) make 4 or 5.  6 or 7 is rare, IMO.  When a shoe made 3 F-7's, I will generally wager heavy on numerous spots for the 4th and the 5th ones. 

Also in relation to F-7's are ties.  I have found it favorable towards producing F-7's with zero or low ties. 

[alrelax]

Section 'A'.  Starts out all Players.  First hand is a 3 card draw for both sides, reducing each side to a total value of 1.  Tie.  Second hand, is a 3 card 9 for the Players and the 3rd card is a 7 for the Banker and everyone freaks out as no F-7.  Each of the following 2 hands, hands 3 and 4, Banker reduced to lose.  Then the Panda 8.  And so many times, 8 out of 10 (?), the P-8 or F-7 cuts to the opposite side.  And it did just that.  The first 17 hands, about ¼ of the shoe was kind of strong with a cluster. 

Section 'B'.  Then the 1's and 2's appear with a F-7 that also cuts to the other side and then the turning point for the 'section' was the second F-7 followed by a tie and then the cut to the Players without making a 2nd Banker.  Then 3 groups of 3 each for the B and the P.  Then it is right at half way.  The Player produces to exactly same 9/8's Naturals.  Same suites-same cards, exactly, strange—back-to-back. 

Section 'C'.  Then the 7 Banker run with another F-7.  Most Bankers hands won with a total of a 7.  Then a tie following the F-7 and the cut to the Player once again.  Then is turned classically weak.  Another F-7 and another P-8.

Section 'D'.  I am not a fan of wagering the last 20% or 15-18 hands or so.  Another F-7 and another P-8 on the last hand. 

Lots of Bad Beats, especially grouping up of them.  Lots of side wagers prevailed.  When they are there, you have to grab them.  Look for insight, look for something saying, this is a fighting shoe between two strong sides, both producing everything, throughout the shoe. 

ASYM:  Hand 78 was a 'J' and a 'Q' for the Players first 2 cards and a '6' and a '10' for the Bankers first 2 cards.  Then a 6 for the Players and the magical 'A' for the Bankers third card hit, rare!!  Make this the 3rd time I ever saw it I think, maybe 4.  Tops!

Train your mind to recognize the consistencies as well as the deviations.  That is the only way you can catch it without getting too far off balance.  When you become accustomed to something or 'side'--'favor' certain key wagers only, that is hampering yourself to fully remain--stay and position yourself as 'neutral'.  Yes, it is very hard--at least for me have that vision.  Even exhausting and physically taxing, but unless you think you can win by just pure, blind guessing, sipping on alcohol and wishing for luck as you cross your fingers, there is no other way.  IMO and experience.

Also, you could have made this a 5 section shoe and that would have had the following changes.  Stopping 'B' at hand 32 and making 'C' from hand 33 to hand 48.  Then 'D' from hand 49 to hand 63.  Then 'D' would just turn into 'E'.