TRNG ODDS & END PLAY

Sputnik · June 07, 2015, 02:37:56 PM

One member with the name Bayes once post that is better to follow the random flow then betting aginst it.
This was due towards a mathematical formula about a coin flip.

I solve this puzzel getting the maximum advantage out of the random flow using what is present.
Each new bet is a new situation where you bet different - when there is a change and you adapt.
You need situational awernes to keep up with the algorithm.

The minimum template is two as you deal with last bet and the present bet.
I call this TRNG ODDS following what is present and the END PLAY is when the random flow comes with new events with no repeats.
But don't be misstaken - this march capture all possibilitys of present repeats no matter strikes or zig zag.
It has a level of tolerans towards how the random flow unfold.

I will describe this method at John's private forum for further development.

Big EZ · June 07, 2015, 06:01:49 PM

Sounds interesting

vo rogue · June 08, 2015, 01:57:44 PM

i thought john wayne passed on ?.

ADulay · June 09, 2015, 09:55:51 PM

Quote from: Sputnik on June 07, 2015, 02:37:56 PM
I will describe this method at John's private forum for further development.

That may be all well and good but "John's private forum" is so exclusive, that only the finest and brightest of the followers in John's camp can even begin to think about being a member for longer than 30 minutes unless they produce a sufficient quantity of internet verbiage to satisfy the owner/operator of the site.

So, for the unwashed masses who are strictly forbidden from even seeing the inside of "John's private forum", you may want to parcel out some small piece of the pie to the huddled assembly here.

AD (humor anyone?)

albertojonas · June 09, 2015, 11:01:41 PM

I am interested in that.
But what is john's private forum? Who is john? Do we need invitation?

greenguy · June 09, 2015, 11:27:59 PM

Quote from: albertojonas on June 09, 2015, 11:01:41 PM
I am interested in that.
But what is john's private forum? Who is john? Do we need invitation?

John is rolex-watch and what AD said is the case.
I think I lasted about 48 hours then got expelled for not posting anything... too funny!
[smiley]aes/lol.png[/smiley]

Tomla · June 10, 2015, 12:03:42 AM

same here---I kept one of his forums going for a year, then he exed me after I quieted down---geez it was all to silly

soxfan · June 10, 2015, 12:34:01 AM

The john-O/mr.tilt is plenty entertaining, I'll give him that much, hey hey.

HunchBacShrimp · June 10, 2015, 01:51:20 AM

If it is only going to be explained and discussed on a private forum then don't mention it here.
It's an exercise in superfluousness at best.
It can only be perceived as one of two things : a trolling attempt to draw members into the aforementioned private forum, or it can be considered a 'snubbing of the nose', demonstrating how the OP is a member of an exclusive private baccarat forum.

Personally, I don't think it has any intentional meaning whatsoever. No malicious intent or subterfuge.
Just another complicated, interesting method in choosing B or P. Married to a MM which will be nothing more than a negative progression.

There is no holy grail over there. Our grass is just as green as their grass.

soxfan · June 10, 2015, 02:03:28 AM

The john-O/mr.tilt is a just an attention seeking melodrama queen, hey hey.

Sputnik · June 10, 2015, 07:31:44 AM

This is the reason i want to be part of John's forum - first i like John being honest and straight forward - and at his forum you don't read nonsense about feelings and guess work.
At John's forum you can read and understand why each trend starts with 25% probability and explain the reason why that is the case towards minimum template of two - for making one example.

I don't have to put up with nonsense about going proffesional and base that upon guess work without showing real examples.
At Johns forum you have to put up real examples to show where you are from and what kind of idea you have about the game.

At John forum you skip the c r a p and talk baccarat with real explinations and examples.

Cheers

Big EZ · June 10, 2015, 12:57:47 PM

Quote from: Rolex-Watch on June 10, 2015, 05:44:17 AM
At least get it right, nobody has to post on a regular basis on my board, but they do have to post at least something of relevance, even if it is to show they actually make it to the tables at least once 'n' while (I don't do free lunches).

It is fair easily to differentiate those that are able & willing to collaborate from those that just want a free read...

[smiley]toto/d200712201607171255.gif[/smiley]

What a load of nonsense. I was removed from your board after 2days because I was putting casino time in and did not have time to post. Emails were even exchanged stating this and was still not sufficient.

gr8player · June 10, 2015, 01:15:46 PM

Quote from: HunchBacShrimp on June 10, 2015, 01:51:20 AM

If it is only going to be explained and discussed on a private forum then don't mention it here.
It's an exercise in superfluousness at best.
It can only be perceived as one of two things : a trolling attempt to draw members into the aforementioned private forum, or it can be considered a 'snubbing of the nose', demonstrating how the OP is a member of an exclusive private baccarat forum.

Personally, I don't think it has any intentional meaning whatsoever. No malicious intent or subterfuge.
Just another complicated, interesting method in choosing B or P. Married to a MM which will be nothing more than a negative progression.

There is no holy grail over there. Our grass is just as green as their grass.

You're a wise man, HunchBacShrimp....good post. Ha..."Holy Grail"...it's more like Holy FAIL over there; "the blind leading the blind", if you will.

Anyone with half a brain and an ounce of experience at this game knows baloney when they see it and can readily label it as such. No need to be lured into any pissing match over Johno's failure of a site; one needs only to consider the quality (or lack thereof) of both its membership and its contents.

Sputnik, you appear as one of the few who can appreciate Johno's companionship; maybe it'd be best for you to enjoy it in the privacy of his forum. No need to troll here, my friend, as you'll find it a waste of time....I'm afraid you'll find that we already know all there is to know regarding your "mentor". Two words will suffice: Not Interested.

Tomla · June 10, 2015, 03:04:33 PM

It seems like a consensus is forming on the other board........Im sure its exciting for some

HunchBacShrimp · June 10, 2015, 07:55:33 PM

Quote from: Sputnik on June 10, 2015, 07:31:44 AM
This is the reason i want to be part of John's forum - first i like John being honest and straight forward - and at his forum you don't read nonsense about feelings and guess work.
At John's forum you can read and understand why each trend starts with 25% probability and explain the reason why that is the case towards minimum template of two - for making one example.

I don't have to put up with nonsense about going proffesional and base that upon guess work without showing real examples.
At Johns forum you have to put up real examples to show where you are from and what kind of idea you have about the game.

At John forum you skip the c r a p and talk baccarat with real explinations and examples.

Cheers

So why don't you be honest and straight forward and just recruit for John's forum. Or straight up and say nanny nanny booboo I'm better than you 'cause I'm a member of an exclusive bac forum?

What exactly is the point of telling this forum you have a TRNG ODDS & END PLAY strategy that you will only discuss on a different, members only forum?

For fornication's sake. It sounds like a steaming pile of c r a p to me without examples and explanations. The exact same examples and explanations you complain about not being expressed here.

Is that Irony or Hypocrisy?

Don't kid yourself, it's all guess work. Every last bit of it. I'll see your ALGORITHM and raise you a COIN FLIP.