+ Register

[alrelax]

Why does 'so and so' work as some write about?  If it is truly a system, a found 'pot-of-gold' at the end of the 20 year search,  definitive or almost every time occurring event in baccarat, why are you talking about it and not playing it every day, all day, day in and day out all over at the thousands of casinos around the world?  Seriously.  Straight up honest? 

Instead, every system post, book, multi million $$$ seminar, Doctor 'so and so' private tutoring seminar, etc., etc., etc., would be so successful----the authors and the supporters in collusion as well, would relish and enjoy the easy, guaranteed and unlimited money from the casinos rather than attempting to snag $49.99 a month, or $1,500.00 for a multi session tutoring event, or $250.00 to join us at a round table or the price of the booklet, etc.

They would not need to deal with the trivial sales, the memberships, the dissatisfied members and players, the day to day hassles, etc., etc., and so on of making a few thousand a month peddling their wares or possibly even just for the fame and notoriety of the authorship??

I guess the real question is, sure looks good on paper, but (BUT) what are the real numbers of the event happening or failing to happen when you actually play it in a casino?  Those would be the real numbers. 

All IMO and my conclusions.

[wannawin]

Why does 'so and so' work as some write about?  If it is truly a system, a found 'pot-of-gold' at the end of the 20 year search,  definitive or almost every time occurring event in baccarat, why are you talking about it and not playing it every day, all day, day in and day out all over at the thousands of casinos around the world?  Seriously.  Straight up honest? 

Instead, every system post, book, multi million $$$ seminar, Doctor 'so and so' private tutoring seminar, etc., etc., etc., would be so successful----the authors and the supporters in collusion as well, would relish and enjoy the easy, guaranteed and unlimited money from the casinos rather than attempting to snag $49.99 a month, or $1,500.00 for a multi session tutoring event, or $250.00 to join us at a round table or the price of the booklet, etc.

I do not buy:

- because I want to help my human comrades.
- because it is a symbolic payment for access to wealth.
- to inspire others.

The only honest answer: it does not work, it is not a winner at all . Go try that on somebody else! If you believe that, I have a bridge system to sell you.

[Gizmotron]

Why does 'so and so' work as some write about?  If it is truly a system, a found 'pot-of-gold' at the end of the 20 year search,  definitive or almost every time occurring event in baccarat, why are you talking about it and not playing it every day, all day, day in and day out all over at the thousands of casinos around the world?  Seriously.  Straight up honest? 

I do not buy:

- because I want to help my human comrades.
- because it is a symbolic payment for access to wealth.
- to inspire others.

The only honest answer: it does not work, it is not a winner at all . Go try that on somebody else! If you believe that, I have a bridge system to sell you.

It's not real testing and it's not a real test unless it completely exposes data on how it loses. It must show the tester what it takes to break it. It must create enough data to prove it beats the mathematical statistics for large numbers. After that it must pass peer review. Confirmation bias can't be used to color the results. It takes real objective research methods.


That's what I'm doing now. My method depends on my ability to stay focused and to execute awareness tactics that make it a method in the first place. The data recovered from real experiential practice exposes my willingness to stay on task. Once that is confirmed, by me, the next step is to take it into a casino and do the same tests that with real players and distractions will confirm or reveal the capacity to both stay on task or to prove its worthiness or worthlessness.


It is only after that that I will make any claims of a working system, method, or whatever it is. I post a few practice sessions just to let a few people know what I'm working on. So far I have a 100% success rate with three net win, flat betting tactics. But when I move up to combinations of 1,2, or 3, net winning sessions where I want to have 7, 8, or 9 sessions per day for a global day rate of net 21 net wins, that I experience the occasional huge backslides. I attribute this to focus issues. So that is what I am researching. Can fatigue, apathy, complacency, or impatience cause me to ignore losses. Can I exit my tactics when faced with a huge trudge of a session. That is the true test. That is why I'm testing. To find the answer to the real questions.

[wannawin]

It's not real testing and it's not a real test unless it completely exposes data on how it loses. It must show the tester what it takes to break it. It must create enough data to prove it beats the mathematical statistics for large numbers. After that it must pass peer review. Confirmation bias can't be used to color the results. It takes real objective research methods.

That's what I'm doing now. My method depends on my ability to stay focused and to execute awareness tactics that make it a method in the first place. The data recovered from real experiential practice exposes my willingness to stay on task. Once that is confirmed, by me, the next step is to take it into a casino and do the same tests that with real players and distractions will confirm or reveal the capacity to both stay on task or to prove its worthiness or worthlessness.

It is only after that that I will make any claims of a working system, method, or whatever it is. I post a few practice sessions just to let a few people know what I'm working on. So far I have a 100% success rate with three net win, flat betting tactics. But when I move up to combinations of 1,2, or 3, net winning sessions where I want to have 7, 8, or 9 sessions per day for a global day rate of net 21 net wins, that I experience the occasional huge backslides. I attribute this to focus issues. So that is what I am researching. Can fatigue, apathy, complacency, or impatience cause me to ignore losses. Can I exit my tactics when faced with a huge trudge of a session. That is the true test. That is why I'm testing. To find the answer to the real questions.

the winning strategy: play it like a relay race.

If your system depends on having a sharp mental focus to maintain good results and it is tiresome then the answer is to play it in group. one at a time.

with so many online casinos and the many chat programs there is not even an excuse to have to go to a land casino and expose yourself. a simple communication program with a group of trained players is enough. with a single account in the online casino everything is set. the whole group can play on it by calling the bets on the chat window.

[alrelax]

- because I want to help my human comrades.
- because it is a symbolic payment for access to wealth.
- to inspire others.

I have seen that or something similar to it in the past.  Some of the reasons/answers giving in FAQ or on-line quotes on authors/seller websites are absolutely comical in so many ways! 

[soxfan]

The one thing you can count on at the baccarats is that the streak distribution stats will play out true, if you play enough. Of course, it's a grind and ya need a 1000 units bankroll, and the balls to put cake at risk and the stomach to handle downdraws of 500 units on occasion, hey hey.

[Gizmotron]

The one thing you can count on at the baccarats is that the streak distribution stats will play out true, if you play enough. Of course, it's a grind and ya need a 1000 units bankroll, and the balls to put cake at risk and the stomach to handle downdraws of 500 units on occasion, hey hey.

My bankroll does include 1000 unit bankroll, where the entire bankroll can be at risk. It represents 8 lost bets in a row or a steady grind downward in 8 net losses. It's enough to discover the conditions that are present. I have never hit the loss limit of this bankroll while reaching 3 net wins as the win goal or session goal. That is because I don't feed the bad streaks. I also play a game where there is almost never a perfect sequence that can kill it. I'm still looking for that. You never say how you deal with it. You just say go bold.