The Boxer is both a concise and potent progression. It limits the amount of net risk at any given point to a paltry 1 unit, while delivering a hefty 8 unit net profit on just a 4 win window of results. The Boxer predominately employs ''up as you win'', with some use of ''re-betting'' of losing bets.
Winning bets progress 1a to 2a, 2a to 2b, 2b to 3b, and 3c back to 3b. Note: Winning 3b completes the series. Losing bets progress (1a remains at 1a) 2a back to 1a, 2b back to 2a, 3b to 3c and 3c back to 1a to start over.

The Boxer is a good progression for environments that will regularly produce either short streaks, or close knit groups of wins.

Here are a few examples....

1.   -1, +1, +2a, -2b, +2a, -2b, -2a. (2 coups resulting in -2)
2.   -1, -1, +1, +2a, -2b, +2a, +2b, -3b, +3c, +3b. (3 coups resulting in +6)
3.   -1, +1, +2a, +2b, -3b, -3c. (2 coups resulting in -2)
4.   +1, +2a, -2b, +2a, +2b, +3b. (1 coup resulting in +8)

A short example using BLACK and RED.

The GREEN signals the end of a winning game. The RED signals the end of a losing game.

[attachimg=1]

that's from the greg geigner book?

That's right Tomla. It's more aggressive and less forgiving than the Mongoose....but if you have something which can be very streaky, then using this can be good as well.

Is there any selection that is most suitable for "The Boxer"?

Quote from: james on August 18, 2016, 01:23:14 AM
Is there any selection that is most suitable for "The Boxer"?

I would say finding a selection for Baccarat might work best because of it's streaky nature at times. The thing with streaks though is that you may have to go looking/manufacture them with your own ideas to get a steady supply of opportunities.

Just as an example, I like to work out my Baccarat bets by taking 4 decisions at a time and then looking for different types of streaks grouping them into pairs.

[attachimg=1]

So the 4 decisions in chronological order are P, B, B, P. But you can have up to 6 different pairs to try and spot different types of streaks.

cheers