Thanks Victor for allowing me to speak, at least once.
It all started with a topic of mine: https://betselection.cc/gambling-philosophy/play-this-and-play-that-but-why/msg34451/#msg34451
in this topic I tried to raise a fundamental question regarding so called "systems" or any well defined approach of casino gaming. Anybody can say play this or that or upon happening of this or that or with this progression or flat bet but none prefers to write, "why", "when" and "how" it should do better that if we bet 1 unit constantly on an EC bet. In a debate, you have every right to put your views and members came forward to opine.
Learned global moderator Bayes who has also been moderator of Maths section came forward and said that a mathematical way of beating the game is not possible. I pointed him to a topic of mine, in Ophis Mst section where with a well defined method Ophis' bot beaten more than 10 million spins. It is pertinent to mention here that those 10 million spins are not creation of mine or Ophis but all were taken from public forums and a few were posted by Bayes himself. In course of beating over 10 million spins we won more than a few hundred thousands chips too. Those who haven't witnessed this may see: https://betselection.cc/ophis'-mst/holy-grail-randomness-can-be-beaten-even-in-the-longest-run/
Now Bayes started to say that it is merely a co-incidence that I could beat 10 millions spins and winning of a few hundred thousands chips were also coincidence. I begged to differ and said that if you are not capable of doing something do not say, it is not possible. It is again pertinent to mention that I openly offered Victor to have a look at the bot, if there is any doubt over use of reverse engineering or fabricated graphs. It can be witnessed here: https://betselection.cc/ophis'-mst/holy-grail-randomness-can-be-beaten-even-in-the-longest-run/msg12545/#msg12545
Victor did not come forward and Ophis went out of all forums after this feat. He created this unique dream machine and earned great from this too. I had the bot (I still have) but it was a protected bot and I and Ophis later agreed that no third person should ever get this.
As per Bayes, all the wins were merely coincidence and in my humble opinion such coincidence is lesser obvious than going to walk your dog and reach Jupiter. It seems Bayes hasn't studied probability and statistics by heart. I asked him if it was a coincidence, can you point me another. I shown him my 32 NDB wins where I need to mostly bet on slots only wagering 30 to 120 times ofthe bankroll. My question was what is the probability of doing 32 such feats by a single man? 1 in a billion or more? I was banned by entire "Rival" software casinos 3-4 years back for winning in many of its casinos. After that I won with RTG, Top game, Playtech, Nuworks, Betonsoft, Microgaming, VIG and many more types of casinos. I posted most of them in rouletteforum.cc and betselection.cc apart from a few in some other forums.Bayes said, unless he see and approve my method, no one should believe my methods so I should give my method to him. He proposed to code that and test which i politely refused because I already have a full fledge bot coded by the best programmer that I saw on Victor's forums, Ophis. If Bayes feels that his credentials are more than that of mine and Ophis taken together, I do not agree.
Upon this, he deleted a few posts of mine where I objected to his behaviour and muted me abruptly. I objected to this to Esoito, Bayes and Victor and Victor gladly unmuted me.
Since Bayes muted me upon the accusation of "hinting", Victor started a fair debate to define "hinting", https://betselection.cc/community-council/(council)-what-constitutes-'hinting'-by-a-member/
I put my points with others. If "hinting" means pointing to a Sales pitch, I never did that. Even my own blog clearly mentions that I have nothing to sell. Bayes objected toward my email. It was something like a bad joke. He expects me to change my email as it looks like "hinting" to him too. I objected this since both my signature and email was approved by Victor himself. Bayes started to attack me personally and other global moderators sadly joined his bandwagon without being fair at me. A few posts of mine were cleverly deleted to support them. It is pertinent to mention that Bayes himself claims to have a grail but as an honest member and further as moderator of Maths section and a Global Moderator, he has no responsibility to put that forward. Only poor Albalaha should put his winning idea before him otherwise he will be muted.
I do not obey such "commands" as it looks unfair to me. I demand Bayes and all listed by him to put their grails before I do, afteral "Charity begins at home".
I can prove that all casino gambling are mathematically beatable, not in a few spins or with a few chips but surely in long run but why should I put this exclusive info to such undeserving community where a Global Moderator himself boasts of a grail without ever mentioning any playable idea? In my opinion, whatever he writes on the blog are merely copy-paste from maths books and one can get all those info from a $5 maths book. Further, his ideas are useless in applied gambling since he himself has no clue of what to do.