This is a double dozen method I have been playing for several months now. It was born out of an observation I made about randoms weakness for staying under a five gap for any great period of time on a live wheel. And 7 on 1 exploits this weakness.

THE RULES.

1, We track spins on the DOZENS until we get a double 4 GAP TRIGGER. Three examples are given below. Two are acceptable and the third is a void. A void occurs when two 4 gaps are divided by a gap of 5 or more.

4
4----Classic double 4 gap trigger.

4
3
2
3
4----The second acceptable double 4 gap trigger.

4
7
4----A void as its separated by a gap greater than 3.

2, Once we have our double 4 gap trigger. We continue to track spins until we have a potential 4 gap on the same dozen that gave us our Trigger. Example below.

DOZEN 1
4
3
4
4? This is a potential 4 gap. On the next spin it either becomes a 4 gap or goes to 5 or more.

3, Using up to a 5 step progression. I now commence betting against there being seven of these 4 gaps in a row.
PROGRESSION 1,3,9,27,81 X 2 = 242 UNITS RISK.

4, I stop at winner. So in the example above we would have bet 1 unit on DOZEN 2 and 1 unit on DOZEN 3. And if the ball landed on either of those it's a win. If it hit DOZEN 1. I would continue tracking and go again until I either win one of the 5 steps. Or lose my progression.

5, I advise to play this method LIVE and H.A.R.

RESULTS UPDATE FOR 7 ON 1 FOR 12/01/2013

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 925

TOTAL GAMES WON 925

TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO

STRIKERATE 925/0

LONGEST WAIT FOR A WINNER STEP 4 of the progression 6 times. Most wins come in the first two steps of the progression.

I don't recommend this method for beginners. It requires a large BR. Its an advanced method. I just wanted people to know how it works. I am using it in my JL Challenge. I believe it will become a VIRTUAL H.A.R GRAIL. It works very well live. It deals with something random simply struggles to do.

This is the most successful method I have ever used so far. In terms of strikerate. And danger of losing my progression. To have gone this long without even a single challenge on the 242 unit progression it pretty special.

Thanks JL for the reveal of this method.
Perfectly understood. Like similar event triggers this cool creative concept will require patience, concentration, determination and rigidly playing exactly by the rules in order to thwart random. The benefit and reward for the time and effort expended will be a consistent trickle of winning profits that slowly amasses over a period into a healthy, formidable and positive profit balance that in time will enable higher staking for even higher returns out of the growing bankroll. I think it's a gem that should not be dismissed lightly.
A. 

QuoteRESULTS UPDATE FOR 7 ON 1 FOR 12/01/2013 TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 925 TOTAL GAMES WON 925 TOTAL GAMES LOST ZERO STRIKERATE 925/0 LONGEST WAIT FOR A WINNER STEP 4 of the progression 6 times. Most wins come in the first two steps of the progression.

                                  What is the bankroll requirement for this? Should I give a sample session to elaborate it?

QuoteWhat is the bankroll requirement for this

242 units, it would take that many games to recover from a loss, on a live wheel that would be days, if not a couple of weeks, madness

Superman, how could you mention that, it never loses..! 

John, could you throw us say a hundred spins or so, with bet triggers / bet amounts marked beside them..?

Quote from: topcat888 on January 12, 2013, 04:22:45 PM
Superman, how could you mention that, it never loses..! 

John, could you throw us say a hundred spins or so, with bet triggers / bet amounts marked beside them..?

A method never lose is without exitment, and is it a game?   JL may not lose using it, but I think it is not so impossible to lose in a row even after a trigging event, a losing streak can happen at any time.

Quote from: topcat888 on January 12, 2013, 04:22:45 PM
Superman, how could you mention that, it never loses..! 

John, could you throw us say a hundred spins or so, with bet triggers / bet amounts marked beside them..?

Okay Topcat. Here is the result of a game I played today
05
32
23
28
05
22
09
34
12
15
08
06
25
06
03
32
05
33
05
18
23
0
09----DOUBLE 4 GAP TRIGGER OF DOZEN 1
05
18
12
14
15
18
07----BET 1 STEP 1 LOST
07
20
32
06
14
21
29
29
28
26
06----WIN BET 2 STEP 2 AS DOZEN 1 BECAME A 7 GAP.

It took 42 spins to complete this game. And what I've found in my experience playing the ZONE in the past. Is how hard it is for random to stay under 5 for over 50 spins.
that's where the confidence in this method first came from.

Just checking, so a "gap" is inclusive of the next dozen, like this?

05
32
23
28
05 -- 4
22
09 -- 2
34
12 -- 2
15
08 -- 2
06 -- 1
25
06 -- 2
03 -- 1
32
05 -- 2
33
05 -- 2
18
23
0
09----DOUBLE 4 GAP TRIGGER OF DOZEN 1

Also, it seems that 0 counts toward the gap length.

I believe so Bayes, that got me before... logically you would expect a 'gap' to be not inclusive...?

Quote from: Bayes on January 12, 2013, 04:59:29 PM
Just checking, so a "gap" is inclusive of the next dozen, like this?

05
32
23
28
05 -- 4
22
09 -- 2
34
12 -- 2
15
08 -- 2
06 -- 1
25
06 -- 2
03 -- 1
32
05 -- 2
33
05 -- 2
18
23
0
09----DOUBLE 4 GAP TRIGGER OF DOZEN 1

Also, it seems that 0 counts toward the gap length.

That's right Bayes. So long as the gaps that separate a four gap are 3 or less they count. And they are welcome. As in my experience the longer a dozen stays under 5 with gaps of 1--3.

The less 4 gaps its can produce before it has to show a 5 or more.

John, I thought the zero was ignored..?

Sorry john, but the only gap trigger here is the break with reality. I tested this progression a couple of years ago on these forums. It even used a logical method of searching for a weakness in randomness, an actual situational awareness kind of a trigger. It fails at just slightly more than all the money earned from the very long streaks of winnings. In other, more appropriate words, it's fool's gold.

I also do not believe you started playing this three months ago. Three months ago you were up to your neck in Pattern Breaker. I'm just not buying it. If you had the very best from your magic HAR then why does the need to find advanced methods dazzle you now? You are just faking yourself out. Please stop wasting your time. Find something that really works. Anyone can see that the philosophical discussion on randomness has cut into your effectiveness track. This trigger based, magical HAR HAR system of yours has nothing to do with randomness. It's pure rule based nonsense.

If you're going to play this insanity in a real casino,
bring your life savings and a sleeping bag. You'll
go broke and be real tired too.

Quote from: Gizmotron on January 12, 2013, 05:52:35 PM
Sorry john, but the only gap trigger here is the break with reality. I tested this progression a couple of years ago on these forums. It even used a logical method of searching for a weakness in randomness, an actual situational awareness kind of a trigger. It fails at just slightly more than all the money earned from the very long streaks of winnings. In other, more appropriate words, it's fool's gold.

I also do not believe you started playing this three months ago. Three months ago you were up to your neck in Pattern Breaker. I'm just not buying it. If you had the very best from your magic HAR then why does the need to find advanced methods dazzle you now? You are just faking yourself out. Please stop wasting your time. Find something that really works. Anyone can see that the philosophical discussion on randomness has cut into your effectiveness track. This trigger based, magical HAR HAR system of yours has nothing to do with randomness. It's pure rule based nonsense.

Giz PM TwisterUK. And ask him how long he has known about this method.

I don't need you to throw insults in my direction. Neither you or Spike have anything better to bring to the table. No clear cut method or proof it works. But you will both be the first to jump on me, I expect that. It matters not both of you will be climbing off your high horses this year.

Quote from: topcat888 on January 12, 2013, 05:33:23 PM
John, I thought the zero was ignored..?

I am playing the zero TC. It makes no difference to the results. This thing will win.