John, something I don't get, is you state: I now commence betting against there being seven of these 4 gaps in a row

However, the last bet that won the game (the second bet) did not commence betting after three gaps from a dozen one number, see below:

09----DOUBLE 4 GAP TRIGGER OF DOZEN 1
05
18
12
14
15
18
07----BET 1 STEP 1 LOST
07
20
32
06 - Dozen 1 - second trigger..?
14 - count one
21 - count two
29 - count three
29 - Why did you not bet here..??
28
26
06----WIN BET 2 STEP 2 AS DOZEN 1 BECAME A 7 GAP.

Quote from: topcat888 on January 13, 2013, 10:21:35 AM
John, something I don't get, is you state: I now commence betting against there being seven of these 4 gaps in a row

However, the last bet that won the game (the second bet) did not commence betting after three gaps from a dozen one number, see below:

09----DOUBLE 4 GAP TRIGGER OF DOZEN 1
05
18
12
14
15
18
07----BET 1 STEP 1 LOST
07
20
32
06 - Dozen 1 - second trigger..?
14 - count one
21 - count two
29 - count three
29 - Why did you not bet here..??
28
26
06----WIN BET 2 STEP 2 AS DOZEN 1 BECAME A 7 GAP.

Lol I would have bet there TC. I simply highlighted when DOZEN 1 hit again to show it became a 7 GAP.

Why are we interested if it became a 7 GAP or not..?? 

Quote from: topcat888 on January 13, 2013, 10:34:58 AM
Why are we interested if it became a 7 GAP or not..?? 

No particular reason TC. That was just where it came to rest in that particular game. All we are interested in is that the game won and it went beyond 4.

So, if I am correct you won the second bet on progression step 5, correct..?

Quote from: topcat888 on January 13, 2013, 10:40:10 AM
So, if I am correct you won the second bet on progression step 5, correct..?

In that game TC this is where we bet.

09-----DOUBLE 4 GAP TRIGGER
05
18
12*
14
15
18
07----BET 1 STEP 1 LOST
07
20
32
06*
14
21
29
29----BET 2 STEP 2 WON AS DOZEN 1 didn't BECOME A 4 GAP
28
26
06

ok, so I'm correct, by the time you won, you were on progressin step 5... 

Quote from: topcat888 on January 13, 2013, 11:19:56 AM
ok, so I'm correct, by the time you won, you were on progressin step 5... 

No TC that was step 2 of the 5 step progression. I've never had to go to the 5th step yet in 930 games.

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 13, 2013, 11:22:46 AM
No TC that was step 2 of the 5 step progression. I've never had to go to the 5th step yet in 930 games.

Correct - and of course there are other double doz progressions mentioned elsewhere that *could* be utilised instead of the total 242 risk...

A.

Quote from: atlantis on January 13, 2013, 11:41:52 AM
Correct - and of course there are other double doz progressions mentioned elsewhere that *could* be utilised instead of the total 242 risk...

A.

Of course there are Atlantis, I don't want anyone to play this progression or even the method for real. I only published it to show one of my chief methods.

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 13, 2013, 11:22:46 AM
No TC that was step 2 of the 5 step progression. I've never had to go to the 5th step yet in 930 games.

Of course...  got it.

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 13, 2013, 11:56:24 AM
...I only published it to show one of my chief methods.

And 'good on ya' for doing so, good or bad, that is for people to make their own mind up.

Quote from: albalaha on January 13, 2013, 09:20:04 AM
John,
          You claim to win 925 sessions, without a loss, with this. It is indigestible in itself and an exaggeration.

This coming from the guy who publicly states in his signature "I have beaten the game of roulette".

Interesting.

AD

Quote from: ADulay on January 13, 2013, 06:45:37 PM
This coming from the guy who publicly states in his signature "I have beaten the game of roulette".

Interesting.

AD

Well Adulay I was surprised at Albalaha's reaction. I understand he is a flat betting devotee.

But I have made it clear this method is for an advanced player with a huge BR. Who has done enough testing to realize 242 units is worth the risk.

What's amusing is if someone lost 242 units flat betting. No one makes any noise about it.

As soon as you mention the word martingale. Everyone and the kitchen sink are up in arms.

I aim to prove that sometimes. JUST SOMETIMES, a martingale even seemingly this extreme is justified.

If the bet selection is that powerful it is.

Good luck with it JL and I hope you take the casino to the cleaners.

Money won is always twice as sweet as money earned!