Quote from: Bally6354 on January 13, 2013, 07:49:53 PM
Good luck with it JL and I hope you take the casino to the cleaners.

Money won is always twice as sweet as money earned! 

Thanks Bally. This is only one of 5 methods I use.

Quote from: ADulay on January 13, 2013, 06:45:37 PM
This coming from the guy who publicly states in his signature "I have beaten the game of roulette".

Interesting.

AD

I have not beaten the game only once but keep beating that. Check my old section in rf.cc: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?board=32.0
                  I am the one who has posted proofs of daily winnings, won many no deposit wagering challenges and won "hall of fame" by a public system testers site beating 100k spins with 1000 units only and multiplying bankroll to more than 6.5 times. See: http://albalaha.lefora.com/2011/12/12/entering-hall-of-fame/


            I have documented every claim of mine. How many of you guys could do that ever? Is there any single member here who could think of beating upto 80x wagering, playing slots, not just once but more than a dozen times. http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=347.0
                        I don't say I have beaten 925 sessions without any loss. I would never try a progression that can kill profit of 100s of sessions.
                 I like Michael (Johnlegend) as a person and have even defended Pattern Breaker because it looked playable to me. When I had a chat with Johnlegend, I told him, martingale is an escapist way of playing. When a person get tired of thinking everything else, martingale looks like a panacea. He said, he is not in favor of dangerous progression either. A three step martingale is not as dangerous.
I agreed. Pattern Breaker is just a way of playing as any other and 1-2-4 can be acceptable as progression.
               This 7 on 1 is not looking a mature way of playing to me which is solely relying upon a deadly progression. Anybody can test it and prove me wrong, if I am talking nonsense.
             

Alblablablahahalabhaahhalla

If it's not a good way to play, don't play it!

TCS

I know what is good and bad and want to warn others too regarding "dangerous progressions". Don't jump across fire repeatedly.

Quote from: albalaha on January 14, 2013, 04:29:56 AM
I know what is good and bad and want to warn others too regarding "dangerous progressions". Don't jump across fire repeatedly.

Albalaha, heres how I look at it. You could lose more than 242 units flat betting. And people do, if the methods no good.

I know people who have drawdowns into four figures. And spend days trying to recover. Now on the surface 242 looks like a crazy risk to win 1 unit.

But If my strikerate playing H.A.R ends up being several thousand to one. Its not so crazy anymore. As I said, I don't want anyone to play this progression.

I am financially strong enough to do this experiment. And that's why I've undertaken to-find out if its as good as it looks on past results live.

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 14, 2013, 06:24:50 AM
You could lose more than 242 units flat betting.

I can't!

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 14, 2013, 06:24:50 AM
Albalaha, heres how I look at it. You could lose more than 242 units flat betting. And people do, if the methods no good.

I know people who have drawdowns into four figures. And spend days trying to recover. Now on the surface 242 looks like a crazy risk to win 1 unit.

But If my strikerate playing H.A.R ends up being several thousand to one. Its not so crazy anymore. As I said, I don't want anyone to play this progression.

I am financially strong enough to do this experiment. And that's why I've undertaken to-find out if its as good as it looks on past results live.

When ever you enter the playing, it is beyond any reasonable chance it can work 1000 of times in a row. The chance of two or more bust after each ohter are not very small. In the game of roulette everything can happen, so it is not impossible, just very unlikley. If we got a simulator and it were possible to run it as you play, I am sure very few will fix 1000 of spins without a bust.


We know any method played of a large number of persons, one or a few will come out very well, most will not.

Hey guys, I've just written a simulation of 7 on 1 and it appears to do very well on a single zero wheel. Losses are VERY rare and I can't seem to make it lose - after several  million RNG spins the balance is still way up! 

I'm pretty sure there are no bugs in the code, but I'm going to upload a 1M actuals file with bets marked on it and a running balance so you can all check it.

Later...

Quote from: albalaha on January 14, 2013, 02:55:41 AM
                       I have not beaten the game only once but keep beating that. Check my old section in rf.cc: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?board=32.0
                  I am the one who has posted proofs of daily winnings, won many no deposit wagering challenges and won "hall of fame" by a public system testers site beating 100k spins with 1000 units only and multiplying bankroll to more than 6.5 times. See: http://albalaha.lefora.com/2011/12/12/entering-hall-of-fame/


                       

I am sorry but i am the one in first place @testmystrategy web site.

Quote from: MarignyGrilleau on January 14, 2013, 11:20:23 AM

I am sorry but i am the one in first place @testmystrategy web site.

That's only because I never tested my strategy over there! 



(only joking)

 

A sample of RNG results, each run is 1 million spins -

Total winning games: 16311 units
Total losing games: 20 x 242 = -4840 units
Total Profit = 11471
--------------------------------------------------
Total winning games: 14973 units
Total losing games: 26 x 242 = -6292 units
Total Profit = 8681
--------------------------------------------------
Total winning games: 16248 units
Total losing games: 21 x 242 = -5082 units
Total Profit = 11166
--------------------------------------------------
Total winning games: 15021 units
Total losing games: 25 x 242 = -6050 units
Total Profit = 8971
--------------------------------------------------
Total winning games: 15050 units
Total losing games: 26 x 242 = -6292 units
Total Profit = 8758

Quote from: Bayes on January 14, 2013, 11:55:24 AM
A sample of RNG results, each run is 1 million spins -

Total winning games: 16311 units
Total losing games: 20 x 242 = -4840 units
Total Profit = 11471
--------------------------------------------------
Total winning games: 14973 units
Total losing games: 26 x 242 = -6292 units
Total Profit = 8681
--------------------------------------------------
Total winning games: 16248 units
Total losing games: 21 x 242 = -5082 units
Total Profit = 11166
--------------------------------------------------
Total winning games: 15021 units
Total losing games: 25 x 242 = -6050 units
Total Profit = 8971
--------------------------------------------------
Total winning games: 15050 units
Total losing games: 26 x 242 = -6292 units
Total Profit = 8758

This should be fun!


[attachimg=1]


My old mate COLIN would now be saying....

IS THIS REALLY THE ONE! (he liked using caps)

Seriously though........

Those are pretty spectacular results Bayes.

I can also see where JL is coming from when he defends the progression. It looks like a loss is going to come once in a blue moon if those results are indicative of any future performance.

Well done JL 

I've just realized that although the simulation is done on a single zero wheel, I haven't taken account of when the zero hits between a trigger of 2 and 7 4's. Nevertheless, this is still an unprecedented result, and I guess you could always cover the zero towards the end of the progression.

Congratulations to JL for his method. But if this hits in so good ratio, I think playing not so volatile MM should be fine also, as John said most of the time hits come on first two steps...


Now my only worry is that Vic will start to recieve death threats and he will have to close this forum...    LoL


So all should be advised to copy the rules until is not too late 


Best


Drazen