Yes, as I understand it, he has been playing this for years.

I played it for a while.  It is too slow and boring.  So John calls me lazy.  I'm anything but!  However, I will not sit and twitter away my life when a bot could do it for me.

He says not bot; I say "Adios!"

Sam

By the way, I had a great run and then it went South!

What's the world coming to when the Martingale gets 38 pages of replys?
You can play this faster on every spin by following the last or betting the opposite.
But that would be archaic and ill-advised.

No betting pattern or trigger will give you better odds than is expected mathematically. If you are calculating that in some way or other,either your sample has bias or you haven't tested enough to see the reality. Only thing that has to be learnt by an educated and informed gambler is how to survive a game with casino favoring payouts and very wild and kind of unpredictable negative variance.

For your information, the statistic average is1 single loss in 32 games, 1 double loss in 1024 gamesand 1 triple loss in over 32,000 games.

Roulette Player[smiley]aes/evil.png[/smiley]

Quote from: RoulettePlayer on November 11, 2014, 07:06:39 AM
For your information, the statistic average is1 single loss in 32 games, 1 double loss in 1024 gamesand 1 triple loss in over 32,000 games.

Roulette Player[smiley]aes/evil.png[/smiley]

What kind of edge you get by this info? Can you predict which case will happen in which sequence? Statistically, in 100 spins, u r mathematically likely to win with any EC about 48 times. How does this help?

22         
          27
          23
15         
          7
          14
          23
          34
          5
          25
          21
          19
          7
          18
13         
          34
4         
33         
24         
          5
   
          16
          1
          19
33         
31         
     0    
35         
--    --    --
20         
8         
4         
4         
17         
29         
24         
8         
4         
          19
20         
          18can anyone show how the method works only on R and N ? Thanks

@plolp
The mehtod using 8 clustering patterns of three (the original) and wait until one pattern fall into sleep, then you bet against it, the odds is 7 to 1.
I test with with regression up & pull



Here is the results where you aim to win once and continue for a strike or break even or accept a small loss.

2014 09 27
WL
WWWWWWWWL
LLW
WWWWWWL
2014 09 26
WWL
LW
LW
2014 09 25
WWL
WWWWWL
WWL
LLW
WWWWWWL
2014 09 24
LW
WL
WWWL
LLW
2014 09 23
LW
LW
WWL
WWWL
2014 09 22
WWL
LW
WL
LLL
LLW
2014 09 21
WL
LLL
WL
WWWL
LW
2014 09 20
WL
LW
WL
WL
2014 09 19
LW
LW
LW
WL
WL
2014 09 18
LLL
LLL
WWWL
WWL
2014 09 17
LLW
WL
WL

If you are going to test pattern breaker, then you might test this approch.
Use the staking plan 122 ... three attempts.

If you win any of the three bets you continue betting using regression.
If you win again you move forward with up & pull.
Just follow the last hitting bet to continue to strike.

1
0.5
1
1
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0

Thanks John, for this ingenious idea, I used it on electromechanical (rolling money 2) and this fits the percentages you wrote in the original message. I ask one query: after losing the first game applying a labby on profits (eg 1 2 4 playing 6 instead of 5 for the hit to get +1, as if it were a martingale hit, hug to the forum members.

This reply is very late. But thankyou. Well after 5 years I am back. I have some new tweaks for the best system I ever created AND STILL USE. So some may remember me.