No need for progressions. 
No need for Hit & Run. 

You have 8 patterns of 3 outcomes = 24 spins, correct?

The random can not find himself, correct?

Why not play every sessions first 24 spins against the next 24? Or match the next 24? -It should work the same...
Why not set a loss limit and get out?

No Mechanical Bet Selection should be better than any other, correct?

We can set a stop Loss of -10 units. After that we abandon session and come back the next day.


Just for the kicks, I will illustrate this with this months Random.org randomizations. From 1st December, until today.




01/12/2012


     
2
1     
1     
2     
1     
1     
1     
1     
1     
1     
2     
2     
2     
2     
1     
2     
1     
2     
2     
2     
1     
1     
1     
1     
1   2   W
2   1   W
1   1   L
2   2   L
2   1   W
2   1   W
1   1   L
2   1   W
2   1   W
2   1   W
1   2   W
2   2   L
2   2   L
1   2   W
1   1   L
1   2   W
2   1   W
2   2   L
2   2   L
2   2   L
2   1   W
2   1   W
2   1   W
1   1   L

The above is example how i suggest playing.

Lets go for the results:

01/12/2012
[attachimg=1]
02/12/2012
[attachimg=2]
03/12/2012
[attachimg=3]

04/12/2012
[attachimg=1]
05/12/2012
[attachimg=2]
06/12/2012
[attachimg=3]
07/12/2012
[attachimg=4]
08/12/2012
[attachimg=5]
09/12/2012
[attachimg=6]
10/12/2012
[attachimg=7]

Your just flat bettin this MarignyGrilleau?

Quote from: AMK on December 10, 2012, 10:02:09 PM
Your just flat bettin this MarignyGrilleau?

Yes. Mechanically. 


Results can be verified inserting the date at Random.org web site.

Thanks MG,


I like the idea of increasing the unit size after any losing sessions.


Could you see how this MM would have worked on your results so far.

Quote from: AMK on December 10, 2012, 10:22:35 PM
Thanks MG,


I like the idea of increasing the unit size after any losing sessions.


Could you see how this MM would have worked on your results so far.

Results are posted, you can work it out  . Tell me if you need the actual sessions with the bets, no problem.

My point here is that you can flat bet against or to match the previous random flow. Let's suppose we had a bot to play at BV no zero. We would just let it run until we reach a profit. It could be any number of spins between 1 and 3000 , we would get a profit, i believe.
We could even do it both ways.

It is just to make my point on hit & run and progressions. The longer one can hold up a bankroll is flat-betting, no doubt.
Just wait the graph goes your way and get out.

Interesting stuff MG (Al?) 

Like the work you've done with this concept MG.

Thank You very much.

Dino.

Tested the concept on 1 million spins flat-betting. The spins are posted here on the forum by Bayes.
The objective is to observe fluctuation and build a complete playing model from there. So we know what to expect.
Will post the graphics here in chunks of 100.000 spins.

[attach=1]


[attach=2]


[attach=3]


[attach=4]


[attach=5]

[attach=1]


[attach=2]


[attach=3]


[attach=4]


[attach=5]

Quote from: JohnLegend on December 11, 2012, 03:54:35 PM
Why shouldnt it? Find me a method that wins 1535/1 for an 80 unit buy in andI will be on it.

I totally dis-agree with your chain of thought. There are good bet selections and poor ones.

Feel free to disagree, but for the sake of a constructive discussion, may you please be more objective in your remarks?


"Find me a method that wins 1535/1 for an 80 unit buy in andI will be on it."

The above one million spins speak for themselves. I am not seeking for approval. The objective here is to share thoughts with the community and contribute into building something verifiable and based on concrete observations.
Feel welcome to contribute with something valid.
Cheers

MG,
       Is it the method that passed through 1 million spins?

It is. Just to prove not the random vs random method itself but that what i believe being the boundaries of a binary random distribution.