Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Re: The way to beat the ECs

Started by RouletteGhost, February 28, 2017, 11:01:37 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Atlantis

Hi James,

An event is a record of the Runs and Changes. (Streaks and Chops ; Series and Change)

For example

EVENT 1

Runs         Changes
x                     x
x
x

His system uses 4 events. You start compiling the events after 5 results are tracked always using the LAST decision in comparison to the others...

All the clues to do this are in his posts, so he says - worth re-reading

A.

Rewster88

well its still a ball in a pocket, what does it change in the edge?

8OR9

OK  .....if someone understand this, how about showing the graph and the actual bets of these  results I have from a real brick and mortar casino

R=Red   ( don't confuse this R with the R which means a run )
B=Black

R
R
R
B
R
B
0   ( zero )
B
B
B
B
R
B
R
B
B

Chef

Hello Moglizu,

Thanks for your interesting system.

I have been reading and trying to understand your system since the first time you posted it.

I understand some of our concept but still can"t figure out how you play it.

Could you please kindly explain this part. I understand you are using flat bet.

QuoteThe 1 of the 3 can produce again RED(so we lose)
The 2nd can produce again RED (so we lose)
IF the 3d will produce BLACK(our bet) then we are winning in ALL 3 wheels no matter that the 2 wheels produced RED.

this is where the power comes...

You lose on the first and second, win on the third, and you are winning in all 3 wheels.

Thanks & Regards

Chef

Hello Moglizu,

Thanks for your prompt reply.

I will try to figure out.

Regards

ozon

Very interesting concept, the most interesting is that we can earn flat bet.
I understand the whole principle of event No. 1, run and changes from last 5 spins but what is in event No. 2, 3.4, I do not understand this part, if in use in event No. 1 Reds and blacks, last 5 results, in event nr. 2 use the same results but how? All the time we use only the reds and blacks in all events. Or in use in the event no.1 first 5 spins, in the event no.2 next 5 spins, and so on?
There are a few unknowns, which would rather clarify rather than make mistakes.

audionut

OK..lets say we have this:

R C   R C    R C
x      x  x    x x
x          x    x
x

3 events completed... now what the heck am I supposed to bet? Would appreciate an explanation other then "gee just read my crystal clear explanation posted earlier"

Thanks

Rewster88

It gets more clear, but you never told to bet 3 or 4 wheels till a few posts ago. This is very important info. Now as i understand it's a little like card counting but then in roulette with 4 wheels. You wait till red or black has more spins then the opposite(unbalanced) and Bet for it to be ON balance again or until you have 5 units profit?

R

Rewster88

Okay then show a few real charts when you get to a casino and play it. Because the more you talk the more i starting to believe that i better can learn chinese then understanding you :glasses:

AMK

Thanks for more info moglizu.

Please don't be discouraged if some players arent catching on. Don't be surprised if the majority of posts on your thread are unkind. I only assume you might not be used to this because you only have a few posts on this forum but perhaps you have been active on the forums with a different username for some time.

The more experienced forumers are used to communicating their roulette methods with visual examples so that there is no room for wording misinterpretations. Roulette is of course simple but being able to communicate a simple concept in words can be tricky.

More visual examples would be great and lead to some interesting conversations. Please don't worry about overexposing your method. A handful of people are paying attention and maybe 1 or 2 will actually play the method live.

May I ask how many sessions you have tested and played live? (roughly how many spins in total)

Looking forward to more of your insights moglizu.



Atlantis

Nicely put, AMK.

Let us keep this a polite discussion about what appears to be something quite novel.
I have a feeling that this could turn out to be a very interesting topic indeed. I'm certainly looking forward to hearing any more info that moglizu cares to share with us about this LINEARITY method - especially if it can give an edge.

A.

Ted009

Quote from: alrelax on March 03, 2017, 10:23:00 AM
My little boy is 4 years old and said something in Laos/Viet the other day.  Turned out it was a bad word, he was listening to his mom complaining to someone on the phone.  When I questioned him, he was like, I think I can speak some good words too Daddy, I told him, save it--this is America we speak English here.

When I go to Cambodia I will have a tour guide along that speaks the lingo.  That way my eyes can roam!!!!! :o
You will enjoy the cognac here not to mention many other things!!
Playing baccarat since 2004. No one size fits all strategy to win consistently.

Atlantis

Chef wrote:
Quote
I understand some of our concept but still can"t figure out how you play it.

I've tried and struggled to understand harder concepts.... Anyone remember James Albert Wendel (winwithmath) and his invisible math?   >:D  :scared:  :P

A.

The Crow

Here is my interpretation.

"I will now tell you how to win the ECs." Equals Red Black, Odd Even, High Low

"R/R" equals Run or (repeat)

"R/B" equals Change or (switch)

Five Spins:

1, 25, 12, 29, 7

R R R B R

R  C
X  X
X  X

Now we are looking for more spins that gives an "opportunity" to bet, because we are looking for is "balance". In other words, waiting for Change (C) to hit.

1, 25, 12, 29, 7, 23, 36

R R R B R R R

R  C
X  X
X  X
X
X

Now we can bet the Change (Black)

Other even chances same spins:
L H L H L H H

C R
X
X
X
X
X
---X

No opportunities

O O E O O O E

R C
X X
--X
X
X

Now bet change, looking for (C) to balance.

The Crow

6th-sense

forgive me if i,m wrong but upon testing the linearity of this i think people are getting confused...the way you are doing it is balancing the the x,s down the columns..like a differential bet as you say its not how much you bet but how many you bet to correct the the columns..either side run or change...a lot of the time its nearly 50/50 so you are capitalising on the slight difference of one column against the other..if not you wouldn,t be too far out of balance..thus the if the difference to bet is 3 against 1 that would give you the advantage to even the deviation out...so out of say 50 spins the difference could be 27 x,s one side 23 the other...and with the way you are choosing to bet it could give you the advantage...with the two ec,s going as it seems two ec,s don,t look like they can both run or change all at the same time..