No. That is is not right Djbac.
Anyone else care to try?

I do not think I will/can continue until SOMEONE will step up and finally post what should be the correct charting to my question put earlier.
In fact, I cannot for the life of me really believe that it is taking S-O-O-O long for anyone to post the correct and ONLY possible answer...!
Honestly - if you cannot understand this preliminary tracking you will never in a million years get the rest of it!!!
A.

Anyone care to try post the concept of the event tracking? I just came across this thread today 6 hours ago and been re-read this thread few times to grasp the concept of event tracking while babysit my 1 year old son. I admit Im not smart but Im willing to try understand the concept hence I need someone to help. Thank you for trying.

EVENT 1
=============
R(uns)   C(hanges)
  x          x
  x
 

Correct?.. Atlantis

Quote from: Djbac on March 05, 2017, 09:47:51 AM
Allow me to try 1 step at a time. I will post the first event.

For example:    R-R-R-B-B (last decision)


     EVENT 1
=============
R(uns)   C(hanges)
  x          x
  x
  x

How about?
Run Change
X.     XXX?

Quote from: rouletteromania on March 05, 2017, 11:11:40 AM
EVENT 1
=============
R(uns)   C(hanges)
  x          x
  x
 

Correct?.. Atlantis

Hi rouletteromania,

I'm afraid that's not right, rouletteromania.  Keep trying to fathom it - but there is nothing to fathom because the ANSWER has already been given in the VERY FIRST POSTS of this topic by moglizu himself! 

To begin to fill in the 4 events with Runs or Changes you first of all require the last 5 roulette EC decisions in R/B format.

He says (and this is important) to ALWAYS use the LAST decision and compare it with the preceding decisions...

For example:    R-R-R-B-B (last decision)

     EVENT 1
=============
R(uns)   C(hanges)
  x

Event 1 is marked with an "x" as a RUN. Can you see why? So far you are with me -  yes?

From the data you have can you now show the FULL chart and fill out the other three events then? 

Nope or  Yep

A.

I see it now!!

For example:    R-R-R-B-B (last decision)

     EVENT 1
=============
R(uns)   C(hanges)
  x
             x
             x
             x

Is this correct Atlantis?

Yes, but you only showed one.

This is what he will answer you

When is the time to tell that all this is a joke?

Quote from: plolp on March 05, 2017, 11:41:10 AM
Yes, but you only showed one.

This is what he will answer you

what's confusing is that they say you need "the last 5 numbers to track 4 events"...he is showing the results of the last 5 numbers, yet they are saying it's only 1 event...see the confusion?

So i got 1 of the event correct thus i proceed with other events.

For example:    R-R-R-B-B (last decision)

     EVENT 1
=============
R(uns)   C(hanges)
  x
             x
             x
             x

EVENT 2
=============
R(uns)   C(hanges)
  x
             x
             x
             x

EVENT 3
=============
R(uns)   C(hanges)
             x
             x
x
x

EVENT 4
=============
R(uns)   C(hanges)
             x
             x
x
x

Is this correct Atlantis?

Yes that's the confusion, is it another table? Is it another ec? Is it stop on that event and the next numbers are the following event? What is an event? Im missing very important information here. Its like telling the junglebook without the jungle.

R

Ok, I will try. R-R-R-B-B..lets put the numbers so we understand better...1-2-3-4-5....We compare last spin, which si numer 5(B) with number 4(B)..so we have X on runs in event. 1. Than we compare spin before that, whis number 3(R), witth numer 5, which gave us X on CHANGES in event. 2....and so on...

EVENT 1
============

R(uns)   C(hanges)
  x

EVENT 2
=============
R(uns)   C(hanges)
                x

EVENT 3
=============
R(uns)   C(hanges)
                 x

EVENT 4
=============
R(uns)   C(hanges)
                x

I think that user Badger did this allready...and I think this is the only way we can get 4 events out of 5 spins..Of course we can get 1 event out of five spins, but I think it would be wrong...


Can Atlantis say something about my post?  English is not my native language, so i hope  everybody understand.

Quote from: moglizu on March 02, 2017, 02:39:59 AM
It seems impossible to me that no one understood the method.
Ok let s see...

Let s just take for example ( this is what you are asking... examples) only EVENT no1.
EVENT no1 is comparison of the last 2 spins(R/B).

We have R R  this is a RUN (because from R it went to R again)
So we have

EVENT NO1
   R    C
   X

The next spin is R R (B) ... so we have to update the chart so it will be

EVENT NO1
  R   C
  X   X     ( We are puting X under the R(Run) or the C(Change)

next spin is R R  B (R)

EVENT NO1

  R  C
  X  X
      X

So until now we have 1 RUN and 2 CHANGES by comparing in every new spin the last 2 outcomes.

when we have RR=RUN  when we have BB=RUN when we have RB or BR = CHANGE.

Now this was ONLY the EVENT NO1

add 3 more events of the R/B.(Read my previous posts)
That all of them are being updating with the new spin...

And then make the deviations correction when the bet selection on either RED or BLACK will correct most of them.

I really don t believe that I had to make examples in order to be understood.
My previous posts had explained everything in detail.

______________________

It takes only 4 spins to constitute the first event.

It does not matter.