Can anyone give the short version of what is happening? I have not visited the forum for days and I do not feel like reading 200 posts to find out.

If someone has it mastered please answer this. Is the method good? how many spins have you tested? how many units per spin is the total average in your tests? where is the testing program if someone has posted it here or in some other forum. Just the substance please, no time for dramas . thank you.

meh

don't waste your time

Quote from: wannawin on March 06, 2017, 07:40:22 PM
Can anyone give the short version of what is happening? I have not visited the forum for days and I do not feel like reading 200 posts to find out.

If someone has it mastered please answer this. Is the method good? how many spins have you tested? how many units per spin is the total average in your tests? where is the testing program if someone has posted it here or in some other forum. Just the substance please, no time for dramas . thank you.

No time for drama?  You've missed the entire point of that thread!!!

AD

Wannawin.



What you have missed was for your own good. . It  was nothing more than a VOODOO  bet selection process sans chicken blood.


Nuff said.


Nathan Detroit 5

Nathan and Roulette pretty much summed it up.

AD

I have been reading the madness topic and it shows that it is cut and lacks the initial information. I found an original version in rouletteforum.cc published on the EC Method thread. The truth is that I am curious now to see how many spins it holds although we know that EC methods are doomed to fail.

I do not understand why delete the original posts  . In my logic a system is published because the author wants others to evaluate it or else to protect a system it should never be published anywhere . The safest place to protect a method is in the author's head.

Quote from: wannawin on March 07, 2017, 06:24:09 PM
I have been reading the madness topic and it shows that it is cut and lacks the initial information. I found an original version in rouletteforum.cc published on the EC Method thread. The truth is that I am curious now to see how many spins it holds although we know that EC methods are doomed to fail.

I do not understand why delete the original posts  . In my logic a system is published because the author wants others to evaluate it or else to protect a system it should never be published anywhere . The safest place to protect a method is in the author's head.

About the best response/statement I seen on this post!  Love it! 

I read most of them and it totally amazes me how many people here actually thought that was the holy-grail and not posted any where else.  I have my suspensions who that really was, but for now will keep that to myself. 

Probably the best one within the thread was, pulling the posts down for fear the casinos would catch on and I can only assume the OP or the others convinced him that their secret holy-grail system would be jeopardized.  The whole thing reminded me of the 'Sonic Late Night Drive Inn' fast food commercial.  Where the 2 guys bicker, disagree and agreement sometimes on the food and things they are discussing.  LOL, the thread that started all this was about on the exact same level. 

You know, I am not really a roulette guy, but I am interested in gambling and this board.  I throw a couple chips or so on Red or Black or Even or Odd if I won good on Bac and on the way tot he cashiers cage if there is a dealer I know on Roulette.  I usually press and press and press and if I win 3 to 5 times I will add it to my winnings.  If not, no big deal.  I feel nothing as I play it and there is not anything for me in it more than a carnival type of game.  But the thread gave me some laughs and like I said, the remembrance of those 2 guys in the 'Sonic' commercial.  Be Good!

To sum up: It is only as good or bad as Johnlegend's Pattern Breaker.

Unless a method/strategy is bringing any change that keeps you alive in the worst possible scenario and let you win back in average times thereafter, there is no single system that can win. In all the gambling/roulette/baccarat forums, there is not even a single system ever published that is dynamic enough to do that. They are even worse than playing any single EC flat bet ever. If you play a single EC every time in roulette/baccarat flat, you will be losing lesser than any of the systems ever published, I can bet on that.