Gentlemen,

Thou I not expert,
I think Albalaha is right,
when he says that...

1]Virtual Limit, is a LIMIT,
that an EXTREME can ever happen.

The prove, is 69red/200spins,
is still a RECORD.
We could fully have faith, that the next 200spins of EC will have at LEAST 69 hit.

Albalaha had stressed that u will never see 30red EC in your entire lifetime.

He had always point that if we could take advantages of this phenomena, then we could have an edge over the casino, but of course U need to think out of box.

2]RTM,

Every expert has agreed that the RTM,
will finally 'balanced' itself over the long run, but, no one see that the RTM theory and Virtual Limit, TOGETHER with simple "loss avoiding" strategy, will produce an edge over the run run.

3]Progression.
Many posting have try to search, for a progression as a HG.
But Albalaha, had always emphasized, that no progression ever, can win, in the EXTREME of random, that could happen anytime. That's why they lose.

BUT does anyone listen???


ALAS, every expert can't see those very simple facts...

Quote from: BEAT-THE-WHEEL on December 13, 2014, 08:35:16 AM
Gentlemen,

Thou I not expert,
I think Albalaha is right,
when he says that...

1]Virtual Limit, is a LIMIT,
that an EXTREME can ever happen.

The prove, is 69red/200spins,
is still a RECORD.
We could fully have faith, that the next 200spins of EC will have at LEAST 69 hit.

Albalaha had stressed that u will never see 30red EC in your entire lifetime.

He had always point that if we could take advantages of this phenomena, then we could have an edge over the casino, but of course U need to think out of box.

2]RTM,

Every expert has agreed that the RTM,
will finally 'balanced' itself over the long run, but, no one see that the RTM theory and Virtual Limit, TOGETHER with simple "loss avoiding" strategy, will produce an edge over the run run.

3]Progression.
Many posting have try to search, for a progression as a HG.
But Albalaha, had always emphasized, that no progression ever, can win, in the EXTREME of random, that could happen anytime. That's why they lose.

BUT does anyone listen???


ALAS, every expert can't see those very simple facts...

Actually he is wrong.  He just has not analyzed enough spins.  You could see 30 reds or more.  It is possible. 

SO???   Almost everyone and I do believe you (the person reading this) would be wagering the average way almost all of you do on Baccarat as well.  Which is: Playing for the cut, the cut that might be 30 hands or spins away.  So, what's it matter>

Dear Gentlemen,

If a person want to become a better person at any endeavor, that person must admit his ignorance and shortcoming, and humbly learn and DE-LEARN too. We must understand that we are no genius, and our brain are just mere ordinary brain.
That's why, every year , thousands flunked and drop out from college and university...All because they do not WILLING to learn, lack of enthusiasm, and most importantly, humbleness and respect the knowledgeable person.

Teo,
Please produce official record,
RNG, can't be assumed as record,
since the law of physic, itself play a part of Virtual Limit.
VL simple mean a LIMIT of an extreme...

Relax,
For many-many times,
Albalaha have pointed out that,
wagering itself will not become HG,
or win constantly,
because no wagering can overcome the beast of VIRTUAL LIMIT!

That a simple fact.
Why beating and riding the dead horse...again and again,
hoping for better result?

Open up, be humble, accept the fact we need to delearn and learn.
EVADING attitude won't get us better.
======================
Albalaha point out the TRUTH, a universal truth...

quote:
"but do they hold if we keep playing? Answer is no. Will someone dare to include the reasoning or logic to play this or that? Be it roulette or baccarat or even slots, what to play, when to play and why play that way is absolutely missing." unquote.
===========================

When I first stumbled UPON a "sharp and biting" critic, Albalaha,
I simply get agitated, and then gone berserk,
and spewed venom too, when I can't stand his criticism....
and can't answer those three simple question.

1]what to play
2]when to play and
3]why play that way

I believe many people also act that way, when they can't stand Albalaha STYLE of criticism!!!
[He was a learned Attorney, and you will understand his way, and style of DRILLING, until your OUTBURST! Your OUTBURST simply REFLECT your ignorant and personality!]
================================

1]what to play
2]when to play and
3]why play that way

They are the essence of a HG, where u win more than u lose.

Thanks for reading.

Quote from: BEAT-THE-WHEEL on December 13, 2014, 08:35:16 AMThe prove, is 69red/200spins,
is still a RECORD.
We could fully have faith, that the next 200spins of EC will have at LEAST 69 hit.

It would be interesting to let a generator of random numbers go on in autopilot to see how much is needed for seeing worst. Not to see if it can go worse than 69/200 but to know how many sets are needed to obtain a worse than 69/200 balance because you can be sure that they will be obtained.