When I read your review I nearly pissed myself laughing! Any review even a 1 star is helpful...I mean that's saying a lot coming from a mob member!! All reviews help because when all my 5 star, verified ones come in everything will even itself out. And once the mob fight each other when I'm selling millions of copies I'll laugh even more.  I'll laugh Gold and so will all non mob readers using my ideas. 2.1 will be out in two weeks shortly followed by 3.0 the book that turns the tables on the casinos in favor of the bettor giving him/her a 1+% edge over the house. 

Stephen,

Is that post addressed to me? because I haven't given a review of your book on Amazon. I can't because it was given to me by a member of this forum. Which review are you talking about anyway?

By the way, I WILL be writing a fair review of it on this forum when I've tested the system.

Quote from: Mike on June 28, 2017, 09:29:35 AM
Stephen,

Is that post addressed to me? because I haven't given a review of your book on Amazon. I can't because it was given to me by a member of this forum. Which review are you talking about anyway?

By the way, I WILL be writing a fair review of it on this forum when I've tested the system.

I think you should wait for 2.1 just to make sure you have all current updates. If you can't afford to buy a copy when it's out let me know and I see what I can do.

I walk slowly, but I never walk backward. -Abraham Lincoln

Quote
All text is relevant to the main strategy, if a bettor or person wants to gain unit wins s/he must know about money management. It's all logical.

To be fair, you do give some good advice, like about not chasing losses. But all this is included in the systems rules, so strictly speaking it's not necessary because if you follow the system rules then you WON'T be chasing losses. And the analogy with trading is misplaced. In Baccarat outcomes are random, share/stock prices are not. In baccarat the odds (payouts) are fixed, in trading they are not. There are some principles which are common to all speculative activity but I think the comparisons you make are misleading.

QuoteReviews don't interest me, moreover ones from the mob.

lol, come on Stephen, you can do better than this. "The mob" are evidently those who you believe are out to discredit you, they have no genuine interest in your book. So how do you know that those who give negative reviews are part of the mob? Because they give negative reviews! (begging the question). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

Quote
Sales do, which is why my book appears in the #1 spot on Amazon best seller out of all Baccarat books! So put that in your
mathematical pipe and smoke it! 

In the first place, I can't find any indicator that your book is a "best seller" on Amazon. Secondly, this is niche market and there are very few books on Baccarat published, so being a best seller doesn't necessarily mean very much. Thirdly, the fact that many people may have bought your book doesn't mean that's it's worth buying for the content. The only thing which determines that is whether the system actually performs as advertised, and that hasn't been proved. Finally, the fact that many people believe something doesn't make it true. This is "Appeal to majority". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum

Quote
Sales are important because the more people learn about my systems there more they will beat the casino.

What a noble sentiment! And of course it has nothing to do with you making more money.

Quote
I try to develop systems that most people can understand and follow rather than complex nonsensical systems.

Why does "nonsensical" have to accompany "complex"? Of course it doesn't. If a winning system actually was possible, logically speaking it's unlikely to be simple and mechanical because random outcomes don't conform to any predictable patterns (as you seem to assume in your book). Since that's the case, any successful system needs to constantly adapt to the changing outcomes, which implies complexity. Furthermore, your statement seems to suggest that you're more interested in creating a system which can be easily understood, rather than one which actually works. Perhaps because
this would sell better; not many people would be willing to learn something very complex, but "quick fix" solutions appeal to the gambling mentality of "something for nothing".

Quote
If you're looking for something more complex to win at a 50/50 game a chance I'm sure the workshop mob in Vegas will help you for $1,000.

It's not the first time you've mentioned that baccarat is a 50:50 game, as if that implies it's relatively easy to beat. This betrays a serious (but very common) misunderstanding of how the house advantage works in negative expectation games. The chance of winning or the simplicity of the game is irrelevant; the only thing which matters is the payoff in relation to the chance of winning. A system might have a 99.9% chance of success and yet not result in a profit. Conversely it might have a 1% chance of a win and yet yield a huge profit. Please learn some basic probability theory before you pass yourself off as some kind of expert.

Quote
You know the one run by your mob friends.

Even if my friends were in the "mob", this is another fallacy: Poisoning the well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_the_well

Quote
I do have a degree in philosophy Mike and in another tread offered to scan and email it to Vic so that he could call the university to confirm.

Great, but a degree in Philosophy doesn't confer any expertise in gambling. If your degree was in mathematics or statistics members might be more impressed. This is the fallacy of "Appeal to Authority". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

Quote
But your mate Alrelax went silent after slandering me,stating I was fake and uneducated and a fraud. Well what do you expect when he fears having the limelight taken away from him. 

More Ad Hominems. C'mon on Stephen, this is getting boring. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Quote
Alrelax posts fake shoes and fake results

More begging the question. How do you know they were fake shoes? because your system lost playing them. Why did it lose? because they were fake shoes! If you want to prove that they were fake shoes you need to provide some statistical evidence, otherwise your argument is circular.

Quote
My book is currently on offer for those interested, click on the link below for the best offers.

And the obligatory plug, lol.

Stephen,

Please try to keep the debate on topic. If you believe that systems work, and yours in particular, then you need to back up your opinion with some hard evidence, and not indulge in logical fallacies which just serve to distract and encourage petty bickering. If you can do this, you will never have to use your own system because you will be able to live off the income from sales, lol.

My latest book is out!!! 2.1 edition which makes my Strategy, Silver Bullet Proof.

You just got to read this book people!!  Get the Kindle guys from here: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0741PX6JK/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1500441816&sr=1-1&keywords=The+Ultimate+Silver+Bullet+Proof+Baccarat+Winning+Strategy+2.1

You can get the paperback too from here: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1548900613/ref=sr_1_cc_1?s=aps&ie=UTF8&qid=1500441816&sr=1-1-catcorr&keywords=The+Ultimate+Silver+Bullet+Proof+Baccarat+Winning+Strategy+2.1

Amazing stop losses and when to bet again triggers and fantastic cleverly developed tweaks and new chapters on systems and mathematics etc. Happy reading.

Quote from: Armilar on June 14, 2017, 03:29:34 PM
Hi Stephen,

I purchased your 2nd edition TUB book a few months ago from a word of mouth recommendation.

Would be great to be added to the list

Thanks.

I bought the 2.1 book silver bullet proof baccarat winning strategy and I am waiting for stsephen's baccarat tie book coming out this month.

Quote from: WildMoney on September 08, 2017, 08:36:17 AM
I bought the 2.1 book silver bullet proof baccarat winning strategy and I am waiting for stsephen's baccarat tie book coming out this month.

Total insanity, scam, fallacies and the author has zero class and invades any and all message boards with spam and his commercial sales that no real gambler will follow, after its been tried of course.